HappyExpat57 Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 3 minutes ago, Jingthing said: Perhaps he just hasn't been informed of those facts up till now. That can happen to people that are in a news bubble. Even worse - studies have now uncovered how idiots who watch Faux Noise actually WANT to be lied to. They know it's bullsh!t, they just don't care. The evidence from the $787,000,000 lawsuit is now undeniable truth, yet the mindless sheep LIKE the racist rhetoric/lies. Fox has been bleeding viewers since the ousting of that putrid, disgusting <self deleted>. The down side is Newsmax is now absorbing those in search of hate speech. Former 45 didn't cause it, he just made it OK to trade in your white sheets for a red hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 Just now, Jingthing said: Enough with the gaslighting. It's incredibly tedious. You will have to face up to the facts and stop trying to distort them , the claim was that SOME of the videos of the day looked like normal tourism , no one claimed that the violence was a tourist outing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustThisOnePostOnly Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 10 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said: And of course, Tucker Carlson, the shamed, now-unemployed mouthpiece of that insidious entertainment show, cherry picked snippets of Jan 6 videos to put the attack in a kinder, gentler light. Shamed? They're about to build a whole news network around the man. Cherry picked snippets? Do you mean like the snippets presented by The Commission, which deliberately excluded important context, context that was only made available when Tucker Carlson aired what he could? Let's see ALL of the videos. What are you all hiding? Why is this so hard? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, JustThisOnePostOnly said: By the Garland Justice Department, which doesn't say a lot, when you consider the wide array of bonafide crimes available for his office to prosecute, but does not. Hey, what happened to the tapes? Why are you all hiding evidence? If it's a big lie, then show us! I believe, regardless of who is USAG, throwing explosive devices at police officers is a crime, doubly so when the resulting explosion injuries the target police officers. Funny how the rightwing go all fuzzy on their ‘tough on crime’ mantra when it’s one of their own in the cross hairs of Justice. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, JustThisOnePostOnly said: Shamed? They're about to build a whole news network around the man. Cherry picked snippets? Do you mean like the snippets presented by The Commission, which deliberately excluded important context, context that was only made available when Tucker Carlson aired what he could? Let's see ALL of the videos. What are you all hiding? Why is this so hard? They? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyExpat57 Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, JustThisOnePostOnly said: Shamed? They're about to build a whole news network around the man. Cherry picked snippets? Do you mean like the snippets presented by The Commission, which deliberately excluded important context, context that was only made available when Tucker Carlson aired what he could? Let's see ALL of the videos. What are you all hiding? Why is this so hard? When someone defends the likes of Tucker Carlson, it speaks volumes about their character. ☹️ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustThisOnePostOnly Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 5 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said: When someone defends the likes of Tucker Carlson, it speaks volumes about their character. We'll have to wait and see if you're right, because as of today, there is nothing that warrants defending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 39 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: From the statement of facts, some pics of the explosive device detonating along with a still of him throwing it. What are the three things circled in red in the top photo ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HappyExpat57 Posted May 5, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, JustThisOnePostOnly said: We'll have to wait and see if you're right, because as of today, there is nothing that warrants defending. Oh, silly me, please forgive. Tucker wasn't fired, he was raptured. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said: What are the three things circled in red in the top photo ? Read the statement of facts contained in the article links Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted May 5, 2023 Author Share Posted May 5, 2023 An off topic post that additionally containing unsubstantiated claims has been removed along with a reply to it. + Another false and unsubstantiated claims post by the same member removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted May 5, 2023 Share Posted May 5, 2023 9 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: Read the statement of facts contained in the article links There wasn't a link or article in that post 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now