A transgender woman has been crowned Miss Netherlands for the first time in the beauty pageant's history and is now set to compete for the Miss Universe crown. 

Rikkie Valerie Kolle, 22, made history after she won the competition in the Dutch country on Sunday.

 

Full Story

 

 

Meanwhile , down in Pattaya..........

 

 

Edited July 10, 20232 yr by pagallim

To be fair, she doesn't look too bad.

Is it allowed to ask which (artificial) body parts she has or doesn't have?

 

16 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

To be fair, she doesn't look too bad.

Is it allowed to ask which (artificial) body parts she has or doesn't have?

 

Titties should be in there somewhere. As for a c....I doubt it.

But I would be willing to do an inspection! 555

I think she looks terrible.  6 feet tall or more, skinny angular face, minimal breasts, arms longer then kareem abdul jabbar, buck teeth.

Sorry, it amazes me what people think is attractive nowadays.

13 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

I think she looks terrible.  6 feet tall or more, skinny angular face, minimal breasts, arms longer then kareem abdul jabbar, buck teeth.

Sorry, it amazes me what people think is attractive nowadays.

11 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

I think she looks terrible.  6 feet tall or more, skinny angular face, minimal breasts, arms longer then kareem abdul jabbar, buck teeth.

Sorry, it amazes me what people think is attractive nowadays.

I'm with you on the critique.

It seems attractive to be woke, that would be why it got the gong.

Like the Nobel Prizes, so-called "Beauty Contests" may have once been based on merit, but now are based on whatever politic is being pushed on the unwashed masses by their elite overlords and the billionaire class.  My guess is that pretty much most of these "trans-women" in these contests will have been born without a penis.  Sorry - a biological woman is not a biological man.

Do I have anything against LGBT?  Not at all.  As much as we are told horrific tales about society's non-acceptance, well, I haven seen in in my circle of friends, family, and acquaintance.  Mostly what I see is acceptance, especially here in Thailand, but also many places in the the EU and US, and again, especially in the part of the US where I am still a resident. 

But what I do see is pretty much a hatred aimed directly at traditional sex roles which are now being adopted by government and corporate interests alike.  The "Bud Light" blowback being simply one case.
"But that is non-acceptance of Trans-men," some will say.
No - it's a non-acceptance of having a sexual ideology crammed down our throats by people with immense sums of money and power.

Then - I look at women in general - straight and gay.  Suddenly those born with a penis are "women," which in turn discounts biological women and their rights.  Want to see real anger?  Look at the lesbian communities who are now becoming second class citizens because some guy who 'identifies as a women' is legally allowed to access to what use to be "women only spaces."  Yeah - if I was a woman, I would not want someone with a penis and a physique shaped by male puberty to be roaming around in the women's locker rooms and showers unless that individual has completely gone through gender altering surgery. 

There is an answer to this.  Accommodate transgender people while protecting the rights of biological women especially.  Easy to do.  In sports?  Create a  competition category for biological men who identify as women.  In "Beauty Contests."  Create a  competition category for biological men who identify as women.  Same for women who identify as men.  I'd applaud that approach.

But what I'm afraid of is what I'm seeing - the destruction of 120 years of fighting for women's right upended by a rather insane wokism that states the women have a 'birthing hole' or an 'additional hole' or a 'glory hole.' 

I don't want my own wife and granddaughter put in the position to have to co-exist with transgender men who have gone through puberty.   I might change that position if a biological male 'transitions' surgically to a female prior to puberty.  But after puberty?  No. At least not in sports.  No - actually not at all.  I'd completely accept a biological male as a 'woman' if the kid is transitions completely before puberty. 

What I see is an open assault on women by individuals who want to blow human society apart. 
I'm pro-female rights, and female rights and protections are being shredded. 

And I'm pro-trans rights too.  In employment, in equal competition (trans vs trans), but not in the access of the spaces society reserved for biological women.  I can't condone that.

Edited July 10, 20232 yr by connda

16 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

I think she looks terrible.  6 feet tall or more, skinny angular face, minimal breasts, arms longer then kareem abdul jabbar, buck teeth.

Sorry, it amazes me what people think is attractive nowadays.

Indeed. A grotesque farce… but quite representative of today's world where nothing is real.

   Give me a little brown Isaan girl any day of the week.

 

The person in the pictures is all arms and legs like a giant grass hopper.

HAHAHA... does NOT say much about the quality of a real Dutch girl now does it...

13 minutes ago, connda said:

There is an answer to this.  Accommodate transgender people while protecting the rights of biological women especially.  Easy to do.  In sports?  Create a  competition category for biological men who identify as women.  In "Beauty Contests."  Create a  competition category for biological men who identify as women.  Same for women who identify as men.  I'd applaud that approach.

But what I'm afraid of is what I'm seeing - the destruction of 120 years of fighting for women's right upended by a rather insane wokism that states the women have a 'birthing hole' or an 'additional hole' or a 'glory hole.' 


What I see is an open assault on women by individuals who want to blow human society apart. 
I'm pro-female rights, and female rights and protections are being shredded. 

 

Yep. You also never see transsexual women competing in the domain of men, either.

36 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:

I think she looks terrible.  6 feet tall or more, skinny angular face, minimal breasts, arms longer then kareem abdul jabbar, buck teeth.

Sorry, it amazes me what people think is attractive nowadays.

Looks like a young David Bowie.

24 minutes ago, OneMoreFarang said:

2/10

1 minute ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

Awaits your hansum pic..............sets meter at 10--hand on dial

My mrs is 9/10.

9 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

(waits for you to post your pic)

you really think the person who won is attractive ? 

 

 

1 minute ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

i was waiting for the comparison....as stated...seems many others did, as she won

let's pretend the contest was won on beauty. hahahah 

 

good one. 

6 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

pics or it didnt happen..beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Post your own pics

1 hour ago, KannikaP said:

As for a c....I doubt it.

But I would be willing to do an inspection! 555

Although I am interested to know if you would gobble up all the evidence either way! ????

 

First the Dutch transgender won in Thailand and now in Netherlands, woke politics decision for sure.

Nowadays, it's all about marketing. The only question is these days, "how much exposure can I get?" So, they let a transgender win such a contest. That certainly garners optimal attention and is good for advertising revenue and to further fuel the Woke movement.

Pro feminists fought hard for equality.

Now they are getting beaten at their own game first in sports, now in beauty contests. 

 

And they are still not beating men in anything.

 

Is it time for them to admit that men actually are superior? And time for them to thank us for all our help over the years? 

They would be stuffed without us.

It's bad enough that men are allowed to compete with - and beat - women in sports, but now they're also allowed to compete in beauty contests. Masha Allah! What has the world come to? La Ilaha...

Edited July 10, 20232 yr by MarcelV

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

To be fair, she doesn't look too bad.

Is it allowed to ask which (artificial) body parts she has or doesn't have?

 

Knockers will be bags of silicone for a start

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Even her face looks masculine. Could almost make it as a Freddie Mercury look alike! lol.

15 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

boy oh boy are the fragile white men out today!!!!!!!!!! call 911 as the egos are severely bruised

 

times they are a changing as the dinosaurs once again rise up to enforce they are the kings, while reality and facts show they are headed for extinction...the new generation is coming boys....deal with it.... you are now the minority and seem quite angry about it....karma????

So the new generation will consist of only gay men and men dressed as women?  hardly very sustainable

Edited July 10, 20232 yr by Bday Prang

21 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said:

im not the one rating people by their looks and claiming my wife is hotter....

 

im simply inquiring per your claim..you think a woman that won a beauty contest is a 2/10...you claim your wife is a 9/10.........im simply asking to you to back up your claim

 

but as usual its deflection and childish replies.....(feigns shock)...fish or cut bait....

it is not a woman, merely a man dressed and made up to look like one.

 

Cannot understand how that won,  The dutch are not exactly spoiled for choice

Edited July 10, 20232 yr by Bday Prang

27 minutes ago, Goat said:

They would be stuffed without us.

They would not get stuffed without us you mean.