Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
22 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Quoting that you "know the truth" because you are from the USA is laughable given your country's in chief liar, the MEGATrump, is telling them all the time!

As difficult as I am sure it will be for you Little John, perhaps you should reread that sentence with discernment... I will hold out hope that you will fathom its meaning.

  • Confused 1
Posted
On 12/15/2023 at 6:27 AM, georgegeorgia said:

I guess you have to draw a line or boundary on what minority groups.

 

I'm giving you an example of the uproar when transgender people went to read library books to children.

Personally I think it was great but others said it's not on and started attacking these people outside the library 

If you think it is normal for trannies to read books to children you are part of the problem. 
 

  • Agree 2
Posted
On 1/10/2024 at 10:30 AM, Voodoochile said:

The goal of every single living species is survival through evolution for this to occur each species are gifted with the ability ( not obligation) to procreate naturally (as intended) by nature two people of the same sex cannot achieve this naturally they can only do so with the help of a third party or science which is what you are referring to when talking about cell division etc.  So yes like it or not it is the foundation of life as it has been from the beginning of time and no mad scientist no matter how many cells they split, glue, can change that.

no need to try and lose us or “drown the fish” with endless technical medical terms it’s really simple and has always been. Everything else is fantasy to try and justify something that can’t be.

the same kind of BS you guys try to pull to explain the so called existence of 40+ genders just doesn’t exist💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

 

Now all you have to do is resolve your little paradox of how the mad scientist got a single cell to asexually divide into two daughter cells to begin evolution of life some 3 billion years before that mad scientist had yet evolved into existence and then one of your learned colleagues will be able to nominate your "theory" for a Nobel Prize in Gibberish. May I be the first of many congratulations.

Posted
10 hours ago, thaicurious said:

 

Now all you have to do is resolve your little paradox of how the mad scientist got a single cell to asexually divide into two daughter cells to begin evolution of life some 3 billion years before that mad scientist had yet evolved into existence and then one of your learned colleagues will be able to nominate your "theory" for a Nobel Prize in Gibberish. May I be the first of many congratulations.

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how every single species has evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

Posted
39 minutes ago, Voodoochile said:

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how every single species has evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

 

I am not denying that you are a homophobic bigot.

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

I am not denying that you are a homophobic bigot.

But are you denying what i said yes/no 

 

Let me ask you again…..

 

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how every single species has evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

 

Or would you rather not answer that one?  
(we all wonder why??🤔😆😆)

Edited by Voodoochile
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how every single species has evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

 

You are wrong and nothing in the universe makes you right, not your God however your perceive that to be, not any empirical evidence objectively known to man, not your choosing to experience life as an idiot, not your anonymously blathering your blatant stupidity on the internet, not your reading back to yourself your witless words on your computer screen, not refusing yourself to evolve within your own mind, not the willful ignorance you embrace & encourage, not your bigotry, not your self-hatred, not your failure to examine your own thinking: nothing nothing nothing in the universe makes you right. You are wrong.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction

"Asexual reproduction is the primary form of reproduction for single-celled organisms such as archaea and bacteria. Many eukaryotic organisms including plants, animals, and fungi can also reproduce asexually.[1] In vertebrates, the most common form of asexual reproduction is parthenogenesis, which is typically used as an alternative to sexual reproduction in times when reproductive opportunities are limited. Komodo dragons and some monitor lizards can reproduce asexually."

Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, thaicurious said:

 

You are wrong and nothing in the universe makes you right, not your God however your perceive that to be, not any empirical evidence objectively known to man, not your choosing to experience life as an idiot, not your anonymously blathering your blatant stupidity on the internet, not your reading back to yourself your witless words on your computer screen, not refusing yourself to evolve within your own mind, not the willful ignorance you embrace & encourage, not your bigotry, not your self-hatred, not your failure to examine your own thinking: nothing nothing nothing in the universe makes you right. You are wrong.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction

"Asexual reproduction is the primary form of reproduction for single-celled organisms such as archaea and bacteria. Many eukaryotic organisms including plants, animals, and fungi can also reproduce asexually.[1] In vertebrates, the most common form of asexual reproduction is parthenogenesis, which is typically used as an alternative to sexual reproduction in times when reproductive opportunities are limited. Komodo dragons and some monitor lizards can reproduce asexually."

Who spoke of “god” and why bring him into this?

the fact that you need to nitpick and go search so far to fetch the smallest exceptions in nature not to mention your name calling just proves my point.



To answer your many animals

nice copy n paste now here is mine…..

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction

(same source😉)

 

Animals that reproduce asexually include planarians, many annelid worms including polychaetes and some oligochaetes, turbellarians and sea stars. Many fungi and plants reproduce asexually. Some plants have specialized structures for reproduction via fragmentation, such as gemmae in mosses and liverworts.

 

Or if you prefer…


 

what if humans reproduced asexually?

 

If there was only one gender of humans (people would reproduce asexually), how would the human world be different? We would probably get wiped out by diseases. As Patrick Wiley says, asexual reproduction leads to very low genetic diversity, and a genetically homogeneous population is very vulnerable to disease.Nov 23, 2016


 
 
What if human beings could reproduce asexually? - Quora
 
Or…..
 

Can any mammals reproduce asexually?

For vertebrates, whether in the wild or in captivity, these “virgin births” are rare events triggered by unusual conditions. No mammals are known to reproduce this way because unlike simpler organisms, mammals rely on a process called genomic imprinting.Aug 25, 2020

 

Here is my response to your desperate nitpicking and insults, chew on it and I hope you enjoy you  2$ big brain😉

Edited by Voodoochile
Posted
3 hours ago, thaicurious said:

 

You are wrong and nothing in the universe makes you right, not your God however your perceive that to be, not any empirical evidence objectively known to man, not your choosing to experience life as an idiot, not your anonymously blathering your blatant stupidity on the internet, not your reading back to yourself your witless words on your computer screen, not refusing yourself to evolve within your own mind, not the willful ignorance you embrace & encourage, not your bigotry, not your self-hatred, not your failure to examine your own thinking: nothing nothing nothing in the universe makes you right. You are wrong.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexual_reproduction

"Asexual reproduction is the primary form of reproduction for single-celled organisms such as archaea and bacteria. Many eukaryotic organisms including plants, animals, and fungi can also reproduce asexually.[1] In vertebrates, the most common form of asexual reproduction is parthenogenesis, which is typically used as an alternative to sexual reproduction in times when reproductive opportunities are limited. Komodo dragons and some monitor lizards can reproduce asexually."

So, I will slightly rephrase my question…

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how the human species and 99% of species have evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

So, I will slightly rephrase my question…

Are you denying that only two people of the opposite sex can achieve procreation naturally (as intended by nature) and that that is how the human species and 99% of species have evolved from the beginning of time up until today??💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

If anything, the larger population of non heterosexuals will benefit mankind's existence on this rock.   As too many people will lead to our extinction, not too few.

 

There have always been and always will be, gay & bi people, by nature or choice.  Same as plenty to keep mankind reproducing.   Worry about over population, not under population.   One is the reality, the other isn't.  One will cause our extinction, the other won't.

 

Long live the gays & bi s, it's a good things for mankind.   The more the better, just STFU. 

Edited by KhunLA
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, KhunLA said:

If anything, the larger population of non heterosexuals will benefit mankind's existence on this rock.   As too many people will lead to our extinction, not too few.

 

There have always been and always will be, gay & bi people, by nature or choice.  Same as plenty to keep mankind reproducing.   Worry about over population, not under population.   One is the reality, the other isn't.  One will cause our extinction, the other won't.

 

Long live the gays & bi s, it's a good things for mankind.   The more the better, just STFU. 

You g(u)ys always have the same weak excuse based on jack 💩 but your passion for 🍆

“ it has always existed” yes so have a lot of other things, that does not mean they are good ideas and should be promoted or maybe it does in your F up pee brain.
 

so you say it regulates over population right?? 
Well that sounds a lot like an epidemic doesn’t it?💁🏼‍♂️very good point 👍😁

 

you obviously dumb and more likely full of cum

you have caused enough shame to your parents and family

so why don’t YOU just “STFU”! You pink 🐈
 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Voodoochile
  • Sad 2
Posted (edited)
On 12/14/2023 at 9:35 PM, steven100 said:

It's up to you whether you choose to watch it or not.   It's no big deal.  

 

If it's not your thing then just ignore it.  

 

Don't really understand why the OP is concerned,  just watch something else.  

 

On 12/14/2023 at 7:58 PM, CanadaSam said:

Now, it seems that almost every show has gay scenes, and I'm worried about the impact it has on youngsters.

I thought the OP was pretty clear about what his concerns are.  I guess OP thinks homosexuality is something you can "catch" and one vector of infection is TV shows.

Edited by gamb00ler
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

You g(u)ys always have the same weak excuse based on jack 💩 but your passion for 🍆

“ it has always existed” yes so have a lot of other things, that does not mean they are good ideas and should be promoted or maybe it does in your F up pee brain.
 

so you say it regulates over population right?? 
Well that sounds a lot like an epidemic doesn’t it?💁🏼‍♂️very good point 👍😁

 

you obviously dumb and more likely full of cum

you have caused enough shame to your parents and family

so why don’t YOU just “STFU”! You pink 🐈

Call me crazy, but it seems the only person in this thread overly obsessed with homosexuals' seems to be you.

 

... even have emojis of hard on ... that's all a bit telling :coffee1: 

Edited by KhunLA
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, KhunLA said:

Call me crazy, but it seems the only person in this thread overly obsessed with homosexuals' seems to be you.

 

... even have emojis of hard on ... that's all a bit telling :coffee1: 

Wow….. very original, what great psyche you have🤔

 Just proves what I said earlier that you are dumb and have zero real arguments💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

again, my best to your poor parents. Being dumb on top of the rest must be a lot to handle.

Edited by Voodoochile
  • Sad 2
Posted
11 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

Wow….. very original, what great psyche you have🤔

 Just proves what I said earlier that you are dumb and have zero real arguments💁🏼‍♂️💁🏼‍♂️

again, my best to your poor parents. Being dumb on top of the rest must be a lot to handle.

Yeah, standard comeback for anyone that does not toe the line is that you're actually a closet homosexual. 

 

I don't want anyone having sex in movies.

Posted
46 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, standard comeback for anyone that does not toe the line is that you're actually a closet homosexual. 

 

I don't want anyone having sex in movies.

Then don't watch such movies. Sorted.
Like people that don't like cilantro. Don't eat cilantro!

Posted
7 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

You are an embarrassment to the human race.

Well you see that is just an opinion, however the fact that you get your <deleted> packed seems to be a fact.

”embarrassment” you say…..hmm that’s funny I never felt or feel the need to hide in a closet nor the one to join a movement to feel stronger and as I said before I don’t need to hide my sexual behavior in any country in the world of fear of breaking the law, and I don’t embarrasse anybody in my family with my sexual preferences so💁🏼‍♂️

No i am positive I represent what is the norm of all societies and always has been.

therefore I am not the one who is an embarrassment😘

Posted
2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, standard comeback for anyone that does not toe the line is that you're actually a closet homosexual. 

 

I don't want anyone having sex in movies.

Really, so can you explain to me how that theory works with other people that are considered or actually have phobias?

does someone suffering from Aquaphobia secretly dream of being or wish to be stranded in the middle of the ocean or of Olympic swimming pools?

does an arachnophobe cover himself in spiders once he is behind closed doors.

again such weak pathetic arguments based on nothing but emotions.

 

nice try though😆

 

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Voodoochile said:

Well you see that is just an opinion, however the fact that you get your <deleted> packed seems to be a fact.

 

 

Who said I was gay?  I never did.  One doesn't need to be gay to be ashamed of belonging to the same species as you.

 

I bet you wish I was gay though, don't you? Methinks you doth protest too much sir.

Posted
5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Then don't watch such movies. Sorted.
Like people that don't like cilantro. Don't eat cilantro!

Except that in virtually every movie/program, at some point people end up doing the nasty. 

Posted
6 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

 

Who said I was gay?  I never did.  One doesn't need to be gay to be ashamed of belonging to the same species as you.

 

I bet you wish I was gay though, don't you? Methinks you doth protest too much sir.

Ok so if you are not any of the letters that compose lgbtq then my bad🙏

And no I don’t wish you were there are far far to many in my opinion.


other then that if you are ashamed then be ashamed💁🏼‍♂️
 Personally I am proud to be who and what I am and speak up when I know something isn’t right and promoting homosexuality at such a level is not just not right it’s madness.

 

 

 

Posted
7 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

Really, so can you explain to me how that theory works with other people that are considered or actually have phobias?

does someone suffering from Aquaphobia secretly dream of being or wish to be stranded in the middle of the ocean or of Olympic swimming pools?

does an arachnophobe cover himself in spiders once he is behind closed doors.

again such weak pathetic arguments based on nothing but emotions.

 

nice try though😆

 

 

Most people try to overcome their phobias but you're proud of yours. That's the problem.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Baht Simpson said:

Most people try to overcome their phobias but you're proud of yours. That's the problem.

I think you missed the point which was the fact that because as said by “ yellow tale” and many other gays If one is a homophobe He must be a closet gay.

my post was in response to that showing what nonsense such a claim is by giving other examples of people with real phobias.

 

in the cases I gave in example the term phobia is correctly used. in the case of homophobia it is not cause homophobes don’t fear homos they just dislike or are disgusted with it. Therefore it is an opinion/ preference and There is no reason to overcome an opinion or a preference as their would be a true phobia of let’s say of heights or spiders for example.

 

Do you understand baht?

 

Posted

I am the least PC person you're ever going to run into, however I am tolerant and I have no issues at all with gay themes in movies or TV. If I don't want to watch them I just switch to another show.

 

I love the idea of putting that in the face of intolerant and insecure men. I would love to see the look on their faces when two men kiss. So what? It is a big nothing burger. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Voodoochile said:

Ok so if you are not any of the letters that compose lgbtq then my bad🙏

And no I don’t wish you were there are far far to many in my opinion.


other then that if you are ashamed then be ashamed💁🏼‍♂️
 Personally I am proud to be who and what I am and speak up when I know something isn’t right and promoting homosexuality at such a level is not just not right it’s madness.

 

 

 

 

You share your views with Putin

Posted
12 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I am the least PC person you're ever going to run into, however I am tolerant and I have no issues at all with gay themes in movies or TV. If I don't want to watch them I just switch to another show.

 

I love the idea of putting that in the face of intolerant and insecure men. I would love to see the look on their faces when two men kiss. So what? It is a big nothing burger. 

Well said. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...