webfact Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 In a swift operation against illegal nightlife activities, police arrested the owner of an unlicensed bar in the Bang Na district of Bangkok and detained four individuals for drug use. The raid, which took place in the early hours today, January 28 at the Clio bar on Udomsuk 58 Alley, resulted in the discovery of underage patrons and the seizure of evidence of illegal alcohol sales and drug consumption. Under the command of Deputy Superintendent Nopparat Boonthanom from the Bang Na Police Station, the team, including Deputy Superintendents Aekaphop Likhitthanasombat and Thanasak Sawangsri, executed the raid at 1am. The target was a venue suspected of flouting licensing and drug laws. The operation led to the apprehension of Panatnicha, the 35 year old proprietor, who faces multiple charges, including operating a service establishment without permission and allowing minors to use the premises. During the inspection, authorities found four customers whose urine tested positive for drugs, indicating substance abuse within the establishment. In a proactive approach to tackling drug addiction, the police recorded voluntary statements from the individuals, expressing their consent to undergo rehabilitation, reported KhaoSod. by Nattapong Westwood Picture courtesy of KhaoSod Full story: The Thaiger 2024-01-29 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingtlger Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 27 minutes ago, webfact said: police arrested the owner of an unlicensed bar Just follow the money. There was no money...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiSePuede419 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 3 hours ago, webfact said: During the inspection, authorities found four customers whose urine tested positive for drugs, indicating substance abuse within the establishment Urine tests are voluntary, correct? 😄 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanuman2547 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 "During the inspection, authorities found four customers whose urine tested positive for drugs, indicating substance abuse within the establishment." Only indicates that they had drugs in their system. Doesn't tell you precisely where the drugs were consumed. They could have taken the drugs earlier in the evening elsewhere and depending upon the type of drug, it could have been a day or more earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 5 hours ago, webfact said: resulted in the discovery of underage patrons So what age were they 18 19 or 14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 2 hours ago, SiSePuede419 said: Urine tests are voluntary, correct? 😄 I remember being at an open bar complex, they came to do the urine tests, one girl came back and told me, she told the cop she had her period, so they let her go, after all the cops had left the bars and the girls went right off, dancing on the bars, some topless, the most memorable one did the splits on the bar right in front of me not wearing any knickers, oh yeh t'was the one who said she had her period, obviously not, 15+ years ago when the bars were so much more fun. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 6 hours ago, webfact said: The operation led to the apprehension of Panatnicha, the 35 year old proprietor, who faces multiple charges, including operating a service establishment without permission and allowing minors to use the premises. One of many establishmants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Korat Kiwi Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Obviously the bar proprietor hadn't paid the right 'security' people enough money to prevent the raid. Or are they the same people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now