Popular Post snoop1130 Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 The Ashton Asoke condominium project, worth 6 billion baht (US$168 million), in Bangkok’s Watthana district is facing a potential demolition if a legal solution isn’t reached within the next three months, a court official has stated. The dispute stems from a Supreme Administrative Court ruling last July that cancelled the building permit for the property due to the inadequate width of the main entrance. The construction permit for the fully completed condominium project was deemed illegally issued, rendering it invalid. The main entrance of the condominium, which opens onto Asoke Road, partially belongs to the Mass Rapid Transit Authority (MRTA). This land was taken over by the MRTA to build an entrance to an underground railway station, situated at the threshold of the project. Prawit Boonthiem, who presides over the tort and other liabilities section of the Supreme Administrative Court, indicated yesterday that the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA), Ananda MF Asia Asoke Co, and the MRTA have a three-month deadline to resolve the matter in accordance with the Building Control Act. If the involved agencies do not meet the deadline, the BMA must implement the act, which mandates the building’s demolition. The stipulated timeframe for the demolition is 90 days, according to Prawit. Wisanu Subsompon, Deputy Governor of Bangkok, is confident that a resolution can be achieved within the given three months. The developer has been advised to reapply for a construction permit without the prerequisite of tearing down the existing building, reported Bangkok Post. In addition, a committee has been established by the Transport Ministry to set guidelines that will assist the MRTA in addressing the land expropriation issue, Wisanu added. In related news, the fate of Ashton Asoke condominium was uncertain as the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration interpreted key sections of the Buildings Control Act. Despite efforts to rectify violations, the Supreme Administrative Court’s decision ultimately led to its demolition. By Mitch Connor Caption: Photo courtesy of KhaoSod Source: The Thaiger 2024-03-08 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe 2 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post retarius Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 I blame the developers.....anything, anything at all for a few extra pennies of profits. Screw Tham make them pay to knock not down. 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rexpotter Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 It will never be demolished. 4 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Foxx Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 "Ashton Asoke condo in Bangkok to be demolished" Another headline totally at odds with the story. It might (but probably not) be demolished. 2 3 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthernRyland Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 what exactly is wrong with the width of the main entrance? this sounds like the kind of thing you'll be ruined for in America, but in Thailand??? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post tomazbodner Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 1 hour ago, Foxx said: "Ashton Asoke condo in Bangkok to be demolished" Another headline totally at odds with the story. It might (but probably not) be demolished. And then that last sentence... 3 hours ago, snoop1130 said: In related news, the fate of Ashton Asoke condominium was uncertain as the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration interpreted key sections of the Buildings Control Act. Despite efforts to rectify violations, the Supreme Administrative Court’s decision ultimately led to its demolition. I'm lost. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post OneMoreFarang Posted March 8 Popular Post Share Posted March 8 The headline and the first sentence of the article don't match. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 13 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Bangkok’s Watthana district is facing a potential demolition if a legal solution isn’t reached within the next three months, Potential demolition.... never happen. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Bull Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 If it was illegal why didn't they put a stop work order on it as soon as they could see the problem? I guess brown envelopes have their limit. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skipalongcassidy Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Sounds like two Thai mommies' bully boys are having a pissing contest... rather than finding an alternative solution. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rwill Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 What gets demolished first. The Ashton Asoke or the Sathorn Unique? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JensenZ Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 12 hours ago, Foxx said: "Ashton Asoke condo in Bangkok to be demolished" Another headline totally at odds with the story. It might (but probably not) be demolished. And in related news... "Despite efforts to rectify violations, the Supreme Administrative Court’s decision ultimately led to its demolition."... meaning it has already been demolished???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkok Barry Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 6 billion baht Ashton Asoke condo in Bangkok to may be demolished There. Corrected the false headline Wisanu Subsompon, Deputy Governor of Bangkok, is confident that a resolution can be achieved 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkok Barry Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 10 hours ago, tomazbodner said: And then that last sentence... I'm lost. Don't worry. It isn't you. It's Thai reporting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post fallup88 Posted March 9 Popular Post Share Posted March 9 11 hours ago, NorthernRyland said: what exactly is wrong with the width of the main entrance? this sounds like the kind of thing you'll be ruined for in America, but in Thailand??? it passes through MRT land which whichever public department that allow this arrangement should never have allowed it base on the laws. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fallup88 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 It won’t be demolished, there is an arrangement with T21 to pass through their land now. An entry and exit is already being made as we speak. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Henryford Posted March 9 Popular Post Share Posted March 9 While they are knocking this down they can come and do the Waterfront in Pattaya. 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 15 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Court ruling last July that cancelled the building permit for the property due to the inadequate width of the main entrance. I suppose a Photo of the Main entrance is to much to ask for as it is the main subject of the so called REPORT. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BenStark Posted March 9 Popular Post Share Posted March 9 5 minutes ago, brianthainess said: I suppose a Photo of the Main entrance is to much to ask for as it is the main subject of the so called REPORT. Full report will be sent to you in due time, so that you can make a fair decision. Please confirm you address 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rovinman Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 17 hours ago, retarius said: I blame the developers.....anything, anything at all for a few extra pennies of profits. Screw Tham make them pay to knock not down. Its NO use getting the Developers to pay, ............. They'll just add it on to the price that the poor Suckers who are going to buy the Condos, will pay ! Just leave them for a while until they get deteriorated, THEN tell them to pay a monthly "Eye-sore-fee" until they knock them down ! Note to developers : Don't start to build until you have ALL the documentation in place in Black and White ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digger70 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 4 hours ago, The Old Bull said: If it was illegal why didn't they put a stop work order on it as soon as they could see the problem? I guess brown envelopes have their limit. Thai Logic+ Corruption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stats Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 A reminder to members commenting on the headline of the OP news report here, which originates with the OP news agency, and not this forum. From the forum's rules: "Original articles, especially in the Thai or foreign language press can sometimes have grammatical mistakes or misspellings. ASEAN NOW is not responsible for these nor does ASEAN NOW have the right to alter content it is reprinting from another source. Similarly, ASEAN NOW is not responsible for any opinions reflected or quoted in reprinted news stories." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancelot01 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 20 hours ago, rexpotter said: It will never be demolished. Same in Ruam Rudi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PETERTHEEATER Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 17 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said: The headline and the first sentence of the article don't match. Nothing new there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 For other coverage see "The latest on the Ashton Asoke Condo saga" https://investbangkokproperty.com "... the development does NOT need to be demolished due to the revocation of the construction permit. ... the company must identify a parcel of land with a minimum width of 12 meters, dedicated to providing access to Asoke Road." It appears that money is no object to acquire such access given that 87% or 668 of its units have already transferred to property owners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackGats Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 There is a shortage of noise and dust in that area. Demolishing such a building (and rebuilding one like it) would alleviate said shortage in the short term. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeN Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 10 hours ago, The Old Bull said: If it was illegal why didn't they put a stop work order on it as soon as they could see the problem? I guess brown envelopes have their limit. because nobody saw a problem until local residents complained. presumably when they built the driveway AFTER the building. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeN Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 9 hours ago, Henryford said: While they are knocking this down they can come and do the Waterfront in Pattaya. And the place in Ruam Rudi ..."Aetna" was it? Haven't heard anything on that for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtrnuno41 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 It seems to happen more in BK. The Aetas Bangkok Hotel on Soi Ruam Rudi is facing demolition after the Supreme Administrative Court ruled it did not comply with the construction rule. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/446720/hotel-on-ruam-rudi-to-be-demolished. Already down or? And very long time ago, a just new build building then, had to be put down, as they used foreign consultants. Never heard of it again what happened. And they let a mall (new world mall) for decades to rot?! Great ! Incredible rich people just like to bend rules and loose billions of baht, but if you would ask them for a satang, they would spit on you. I wonder how many more buildings arent "due to regulations". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deez Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 Expect a big fat envelope to prevent demolition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now