Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, orang37 said:

No way in hell they are trying to defend themselves here; they are trying to take advantage of Russia, which is currently at war, and are showing the Russians who the real dog is by flexing their power. Defense would be if the Russians made some underhanded attacks on the U.S., but I can't think of any recent events that would suggest that

 

Russia has made attacks using weapons of mass destruction on NATO territory in recent years, leading to deaths and injuries among civilians and uniformed services.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Mavideol said:

I would call it a warning and Putin is taking notice

Increasing U.S. presence near Russia: Defense or provocation?

 

Increasing U.S. presence near Russia: Defense or provocation? (msn.com)

 

Or a response to increases in Russian troop numbers along the borders with the Baltic States;

 

https://www.ft.com/content/1ec23623-31b3-446d-aa8b-b60684f44cc9

 

But its ebbed and flowed over the years, because a couple of months later, Russia dropped the numbers on the borders with NATO. Meaning they don't really think NATO is a threat to Russian sovereignty, and the Party Line is strictly for public consumption.

 

Justification for increasing defensive posture;

 

https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-2-2024

 

Quote

Senior Russian officials continue to set conditions to justify possible future aggression against the Baltic states. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko gave an interview to Russian state-sponsored media outlet Baltnews that was published on September 30 that portrays Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia as enemies of Russia that have chosen "confrontation" over peace and are supporters of Nazis and neo-Nazism.[67] Grushko claimed that the Baltic states gave up their sovereignty to bolster NATO even though NATO would use these states as the main defensive barrier in a future confrontation with Russia. Kremlin officials have previously used similar accusations of supporting Nazism to justify the invasion of Ukraine, and Grushko's narrative is also likely aimed at scaring Baltic states from supporting policies that are contrary to Russia's interests in Europe.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, MicroB said:

 

Russia has made attacks using weapons of mass destruction on NATO territory in recent years, leading to deaths and injuries among civilians and uniformed services.

Is that right? Can you give some examples please? Why hasn’t Article 5 been triggered?

  • Confused 5
  • Sad 1
Posted
12 hours ago, MicroB said:

 

Russia has made attacks using weapons of mass destruction on NATO territory in recent years, leading to deaths and injuries among civilians and uniformed services.

And what exactly are those territories, like which country did they attack?

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 10/7/2024 at 2:51 PM, rabas said:

Another  unstoppable, impenetrable, indestructible Putin 'super' weapon bites the dust.

 

Russia's latest S-70 Okhotnik heavy super-drone went awry causing it to fly straight to Ukraine territory forcing Russia to shoot it down albeit a bit late. Analysis of the captured weapon shows it be another nothing burger. 

 

No one knows how the war will end but Putin has surely lost all hope of weapon sales with many countries now rejecting his systems. What you get when you keep locking up your top scientists.

image.png.21bcb5b3d0d73603601c8ef374177d8a.png

 

[LINK]  Contrary to Russian propaganda, the drone does not feature advertised stealth polymers or advanced artificial intelligence systems. The use of the Su-57 manned fighter as a command relay for the drone was seen as inefficient, highlighting limitations of Russian networking capabilities. The S-70 lacks robust stealth technologies and does not feature network-centric systems comparable to NATO’s Link-16, instead relying on a basic radio link for guidance.

Nevertheless, Russians appear to be advancing in the East. That is where the war will be won or lost for Russia.

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

Russia suffered another major blow to its natural gas export plans

Did they blow up their own pipelines again ? :cheesy:

  • Confused 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 7

      Taking Someone Home: Ever Reach Down and Get an Unexpected Surprise?

    2. 213

      Something smelling musky -- the age of undemocratic in your face oligarchy in the USA.

    3. 1

      Biden lifts restrictions on Ukraine using US weapons to strike deep inside Russia.

    4. 81

      Foreign Driver in Fatal EV Collision with Motorbike, Drags It Over 50 Metres

    5. 0

      Female Journalists Rally Around Allison Pearson Amid Fears for Press Freedom

    6. 0

      Trump Aide Urges UK to Embrace US Free Market Over 'Socialist' EU

    7. 0

      Magnetic North Pole's Unusual Shift Stuns Scientists as it Moves Towards Russia

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...