60-day visa exemptions are now unlimited at land borders

[Liquorice]

2 minutes ago, Rob Browder said:

We know the 2-entry rule was rescinded, because this stopped being an issue entirely at non-agent-extortion points of entry.  Prior to this change, they wrote (1) and (2) next to land-border visa-exempt entries, to count them, but not any more.

Can you post a link to that order rescinding the limit of VE entries at borders.

 

3 minutes ago, Rob Browder said:

Not exclusively, any more.  When the 60-day exempt was announced, additional reasons now qualifying for their use were added - including visiting family.

Announced by the MFA, not by Immigration.

[Rob Browder]

4 minutes ago, Liquorice said:

Can you post a link to that order rescinding the limit of VE entries at borders.

 

Announced by the MFA, not by Immigration.

The person in question did not enter by land - so this never applied to his case.  As to land-entries, we have posts on this forum of entry stamps, after that policy ended, and the " (1)"  "(2)" counting is over.    The only question is whether you enter at a "bent" entry point, or not.

[transam]

11 minutes ago, Liquorice said:

Can you post a link to that order rescinding the limit of VE entries at borders.

 

Announced by the MFA, not by Immigration.

Perhaps you could ask this chap........🤗

 

 

[Caldera]

3 hours ago, Liquorice said:

Can you post a link to that order rescinding the limit of VE entries at borders.

 

The order seems elusive (I haven't seen it either), but there's no doubt that it was enacted.

 

The proof is in the pudding - countless people have done 3-4 overland visa exempt entries this year. People who had already maxed out their land border entries before the change were later allowed to enter again. Both border run agencies and IOs at land borders across Thailand have advised people that the limit is no longer in force.

 

So let me turn this on its head for you: Can you post a link to a credible report by anyone refused entry specifically for exceeding this limit since the new rules went into effect? Genuinely curious, I haven't seen any.

[Liquorice]

20 hours ago, Caldera said:

The proof is in the pudding - countless people have done 3-4 overland visa exempt entries this year. People who had already maxed out their land border entries before the change were later allowed to enter again. Both border run agencies and IOs at land borders across Thailand have advised people that the limit is no longer in force.

 

So let me turn this on its head for you: Can you post a link to a credible report by anyone refused entry specifically for exceeding this limit since the new rules went into effect? Genuinely curious, I haven't seen any.

The MFA only made an announcement in July.

With 60 days now on entry + 30 day extensions, 3rd or 4th entries wouldn't be due yet.

I've only read of two entries since.

 

To redact their order it would have to be announced in the Royal Gazette, and that hasn't happened.
They may not be enforcing the 2 VE border crossing, but that could change at a whim.

[Liquorice]

23 hours ago, transam said:

Perhaps you could ask this chap........🤗

He's not Immigration or an official.

[transam]

1 hour ago, Liquorice said:

He's not Immigration or an official.

So you are not going to ask him, you would rather ask members on here..................🤭

[Maestro]

This topic is about the new 60-day visa-exempt entry (VE60), which is separate and distinctly different from the 30-day visa exempt entry (VE-30).

 

Therefore, any request for proof of an official rescission of limitations and/or restrictions related to the VE30 are off-topic here.

 

Anyone with knowledge of a publication in the  Royal Gazette of a limit of the number of entries with VE60 within a specific period of time is kindly invited to post the relevant link here.

[Caldera]

3 hours ago, Liquorice said:

The MFA only made an announcement in July.

With 60 days now on entry + 30 day extensions, 3rd or 4th entries wouldn't be due yet.

I've only read of two entries since.

 

You've misread my post, as I wrote that people who had already maxed out their overland visa exempt entries for 2024 under the old rules were nevertheless allowed to enter visa exempt when the new rules came into effect. So those are the ones I mean with 3-4 overland visa exempt entries this year in total - two visa exempt entries under the old rules plus 1-2 visa visa exempt entries under the new rules. There are many of them.

 

I like the interpretation @Maestrohas posted here in the meantime, that the limitation for VE-30 didn't even need to be formally rescinded, because VE-30 entries currently aren't possible as they have been superseded by VE-60 entries for all those who had qualified for VE-30 before (plus many additional nationalities). That's the most sensible explanation for the apparent lack of such an order I've seen to date.

[Liquorice]

2 hours ago, transam said:

So you are not going to ask him, you would rather ask members on here..................🤭

He is a member here, and you quoted his topic, so I don't need to ask him, the same as you didn't.

[Liquorice]

1 hour ago, Maestro said:

Anyone with knowledge of a publication in the  Royal Gazette of a limit of the number of entries with VE60 within a specific period of time is kindly invited to post the relevant link here.

Is there an official publication for limited VE entries by air.

No, but Immigration imposes restrictions at their own discretion.

Just my opinion, but only a question of time before we start reading refused VE at a land border.
Time will tell.