Jump to content

It's time to put this Progressive Left-wing Conspiracy Theory to bed


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

A round hitting a flat cardboard target, at right angles, and the associated damage it causes. is an entirely different matter to a round grazing a human head.

It did not graze his head; it grazed his ear. Yes, the ear is part of the head, but it typically sticks out. 

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

Whilst you have, no doubt, great experience with paper targets, my experience, gained over 28 years as a soldier, encompasses seeing the effects of both 5.56 and 7.62 bullets on both paper targets and human beings. 

I bet, SIS no doubt. 

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

So I reiterate, a high velocity 5.56 bullet, passing alongside a human head, close enough to hit the ear, would have done far more damage.

No, it would not have. 

1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

If nothing else, that close to his ear, he would be deafened in that ear, probably permanently, certainly ruptured eardrums.

The only real noise would be the round hitting the ear. The round passing through the air makes very little noise. Virtually all the noise from a firearm, is the combustion, and the crack of the round breaking the sound barrier as it exits the muzzle. 

 

As an MI6 agent, surely you know all of this.  

  • Love It 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The only real noise would be the round hitting the ear. The round passing through the air makes very little noise. Virtually all the noise from a firearm, is the combustion, and the crack of the round breaking the sound barrier as it exits the muzzle. 

 

Many bullets travel at supersonic speeds, creating a shockwave or “crack” as they break the sound barrier. This crack can be very loud, often exceeding 140 decibels (dB).

 

A sound level of 140 dB or more can cause instant and permanent hearing loss.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

No, it was a made up conspiracy. Where would glass even come from? 

Trump fired & replaced a FBI director who was politically bias(rino comey)and help entrap, set up Trumps National Security Adviser, Flynn.

It was suggested by Chris Cristy to appoint Wray!

This time around, Shrapnel Wray ,Won’t Last A Day.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Many bullets travel at supersonic speeds, creating a shockwave or “crack” as they break the sound barrier. This crack can be very loud, often exceeding 140 decibels (dB).

 

A sound level of 140 dB or more can cause instant and permanent hearing loss.

 

Is that not what I said? "The only real noise would be the round hitting the ear. The round passing through the air makes very little noise. Virtually all the noise from a firearm, is the combustion, and the crack of the round breaking the sound barrier as it exits the muzzle." 

 

The bullet only breaks the sound barrier once. Once the bullet exits the muzzle, it starts slowing down, it does not keep making noise until it hits something. 

 

The noise is (virtually) all at the shooter. The bullet, travelling faster than sound, hits the target before the target can hear it. The noise Trump heard, would have been about the same as anyone around him heard, except that Trump likely heard the thump of the impact on the ear. 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

the round passing through the air makes very little noise

No.....near the ear, not hitting the ear.

 

The sound, 140dB, is from the pressure wave not the act of hitting the ear.

 

A typical round is still travelling at 2 to 3 times the speed of sound after travelling 200m

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

No.....near the ear, not hitting the ear.

 

The sound, 140dB, is from the pressure wave not the act of hitting the ear.

 

A typical round is still travelling at 2 to 3 times the speed of sound after travelling 200m

Then it would make the same "pressure wave" and noise as it passed by anything, yes? 

 

And at 140db, anyone standing within 100m would hear it as well, yes? 

 

And it would sound like two shots, because the time of impact is different from the time of impact, yes? 

 

And any instant and permanent damage would be minor/negligible, yes? Because if it weren't most every shooter would be deaf, yes? 

 

Trump got nicked on the ear with a bullet, and even if he did not, and he actually got hit by a fragment, what difference does it make? Do you think it was staged or what? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
20 hours ago, connda said:

Yes - Donald Trump was hit in the ear with a bulletSource: The FBI.

:angry: "No no no.  It was glass and Trump is just a weenie and whiner for getting a little boo-boo on his ear and saying he got hit with a bullet.  Ha ha ha."

🙄 Sorry Lefties.  He was hit in the ear with a bullet according to the FBI which which came a few millimeters from killing him during the July 13th assassination attempt.  Why trivialize that heinous attack?  Well, other than ya'll being full of hated for anyone who espoused conservative values. Especially Trump and his supporters.

:angry: "You're just a typical MAGA Trump Supporter!!!  Grrrrr!"

:wink: Sorry to inform you Lefty Conspiracy Theorists, but you've got that wrong too.  Yeah, I'm gonna vote in November, just not for either of candidates from the Two-Party-DuopolyTM .  Conservative doesn't = MAGA Trump Supporter.  Both Democrats and Republicans suck.  But neither deserve to be the object of an assassination attempt no matter how much any of us may dislike a candidate.  A Liberal Democracy isn't built on assassination attempts on those whom you personally dislike although the Left-wing Conspiracy Theorists may disagree, it's built on the democratically elected representatives chosen in elections.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/fbi-confirms-bullet-struck-trumps-ear-assassination-attempt-rcna163896

I know few that think Trump wasn't hit by a bullet. Just those who get their information from dodgy media outlets.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

I know few that think Trump wasn't hit by a bullet. Just those who get their information from dodgy media outlets.

How about the guys that think it was the "shock wave" of the bullet passing by, or a shard of glass from an undamaged plastic teleprompter? Those guys are a hoot huh? 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Topics

  • Latest posts...

    1. 4

      Advise sought on second hand PCX or Nmax

    2. 10

      Abortion

    3. 82

      Mike Waltz Warns Hostage-Takers: “Bullet in Your Damn Forehead”

    4. 82

      Mike Waltz Warns Hostage-Takers: “Bullet in Your Damn Forehead”

    5. 180

      Britain’s Sharia Courts and the Challenge of Religious Freedom

    6. 7

      Thai woman arrested for fatally shooting girlfriend, ending 12-year relationship

    7. 43

      A Christmas Day bust-up down the 7/11.

    8. 0

      I'm Non-B Work Extension. Spouse is Non-O Dependent Extension. Convert Non-O Retirement?

  • Popular in The Pub


×
×
  • Create New...