29 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

No he didn't say that, it was just a sensational title from a woke newspaper to get attention, and you exaggerated it.

 

In short, don't tread on MAGA M.O.!

19 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Your numbers are questionable. 

 

Biden won 81,283,098 votes, or 51.3 percent of the votes cast. He is the first U.S. presidential candidate to have won more than 80 million votes. Trump won 74,222,958 votes, or 46.8 percent of the votes cast. 

 

https://www.cfr.org/blog/2020-election-numbers

Questionable? Exactly.

Go research how many of those "81,283,098 votes" are not legitimate. Biden didn't win, he was installed, and for obvious reasons. You seriously think he'd get more votes than BHO (i.e. the man behind the curtain)?  And think why they'd give him KH, who got 0% in the primaries. Both are idiots. And oh look, now she too, has been installed as Dems candidate -- no opportunity for the people to choose.

 

USA now a banana republic, thanks to the Dems and DS. And you shill for it.

 

Everybody is free to hate Trump as much as they want, for any reason. But anyone not pushing for him to win, also hates the USA.

 

3 hours ago, marin said:

How come Donald J. is not dancing like he did last time around.  The guy does have moves.  🤣

 

 

Having a near-death experience can be a bit humbling. 

6 hours ago, CallumWK said:

I'll just leave this here.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/08/12/us-news/time-profile-of-kamala-harris-ripped-for-worshipping-dem-nominee/

 

She will be outed -- and perhaps ousted -- come debate time. Just as JB was. It will be most entertaining.

Too bad she doesn't have the balls and brains to do three.

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Gangsters.

42 minutes ago, DustyShoes said:

Questionable? Exactly.

Go research how many of those "81,283,098 votes" are not legitimate. Biden didn't win, he was installed, and for obvious reasons. You seriously think he'd get more votes than BHO (i.e. the man behind the curtain)?  And think why they'd give him KH, who got 0% in the primaries. Both are idiots. And oh look, now she too, has been installed as Dems candidate -- no opportunity for the people to choose.

 

USA now a banana republic, thanks to the Dems and DS. And you shill for it.

 

Everybody is free to hate Trump as much as they want, for any reason. But anyone not pushing for him to win, also hates the USA.

 

Your post is beyond silly, it's infantile, it's false, it's based on nothing but gorging on extremist podcasts, and your last statement was just beyond the pale. What you're saying is that 100 million Democrats hate America, that's some really brilliant stuff. A bit like saying we are all communists. Dumb and dumber. 

1 hour ago, DustyShoes said:

Everybody is free to hate Trump as much as they want, for any reason. But anyone not pushing for him to win, also hates the USA.

 

 

 

That is so twisted words fail me.

 

 

The Deep State - of which the MSM and certain pseudo-alternative sources are an integral part - ensures that there are effectively only two candidates for the Presidency.  One whom they want, because she will do what is required of her, and the other whom they do not want and will blacken in the belief he can be prevented from winning.  (And if he does win, they will do as they did last time)

 

This is an age-old strategy called "divide-and-rule".

 

Neither of these candidates represents the broad interests of US citizens, but rather of mega-financiers intent upon controlling and bleeding the citizenry.  In one word: neo-feudalists.

 

The shadow government does everything within its considerable power to push into the background potential candidates who might unite the nation by appealing to common (and common-sense) solutions to the snowballing problems created over recent generations by the military-industrial-security state.

 

[A good exposé of Kamala Harris's true nature can be found by searching for recent interviews of what Tulsi Gabbard has to say on the subject]

2 minutes ago, ericbj said:

Tulsi Gabbard

 

 

5555

A flame post using “pedo” nickname has been remove.

TIME Covers

 

Hitler  8 times  Man of the Year (MOY) 1938

Stalin 12 times  MOY 1939, 1942

Mao 12 times MOY 1949

Pol Pot 1

Snoopy 1

Jesus 21

Kermit the Frog 1

2 minutes ago, ignore it said:

TIME Covers

 

Hitler  8 times  Man of the Year (MOY) 1938

Stalin 12 times  MOY 1939, 1942

Mao 12 times MOY 1949

Pol Pot 1

Snoopy 1

Jesus 21

Kermit the Frog 1

 

 

They have photos of Jesus.....Jesus!

Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

They have photos of Jesus.....Jesus!

And you trust them 

Just now, Yellowtail said:

And you trust them 

 

 

What??.....if they have photos of Jesus they must have got them from God (or Trump).....so yes.

36 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

5555

Interesting.

https://www.anahana.com/en/angel-numbers/5555-angel-number

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Your post is beyond silly, it's infantile, it's false, it's based on nothing but gorging on extremist podcasts, and your last statement was just beyond the pale. What you're saying is that 100 million Democrats hate America, that's some really brilliant stuff. A bit like saying we are all communists. Dumb and dumber. 

Not exactly, but you're getting close. Just keep looking deeper in the mirror when you write.

 

100m Dems hate USA? Not necessarily. Let's just say ignorance is bliss. Yet, there are plenty of smart Dems with open eyes, who see thru the facade. If you did more research and less gaslighting, you could graduate to the latter group.

 

Good luck. To all of us.

2 minutes ago, ericbj said:

Interesting.

https://www.anahana.com/en/angel-numbers/5555-angel-number

 

Oh wow.

 

Interesting. Thanks for that......555

57 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

That is so twisted words fail me.

 

 

Not surprised. Perhaps it'll come to you when it's knocking on your door. Cheers.

1 minute ago, DustyShoes said:

Not surprised. Perhaps it'll come to you when it's knocking on your door. Cheers.

 

 

Tin foil isn't doing it for you......try something more substantial. 

8 hours ago, CallumWK said:

I'll just leave this here.

 

https://nypost.com/2024/08/12/us-news/time-profile-of-kamala-harris-ripped-for-worshipping-dem-nominee/

 

It’s quite remarkable how the constituency of the left gobbles up this trash, so desperate for the fantasy rhetoric of the medias prop and flat out lies. 

14 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

Tin foil isn't doing it for you......try something more substantial. 

Ok, so I can't win you over with intelligence. How about just plain common sense.

 

Listen to Trump and Musk from today.

 

Now swap out Trump for KH.

 

If you still don't get it....

 

(Sorry, have to go.... can't write rolling on the floor in laughter!.... not so much at you, just the thought of her talking to Musk 555555)

1 minute ago, DustyShoes said:

Ok, so I can't win you over with intelligence. How about just plain common sense.

 

Listen to Trump and Musk from today.

 

Now swap out Trump for KH.

 

If you still don't get it....

 

(Sorry, have to go.... can't write rolling on the floor in laughter!.... not so much at you, just the thought of her talking to Musk 555555)

 

 

You are destined to give some of the others on here a run for their money re: The master of wit and ready repartee.

6 hours ago, marin said:

 

That's the "my diaper needs changing" dance. 

6 hours ago, Purdey said:

I just guess she has been travelling the country to meet people non-stop and has put interviews with the media on hold while she meets citizens. This could mean she isn't a self-centred narcissist who needs to see herself constantly on TV always, or that she is missing an opportunity to get a wider audience. 

 

Or it could mean she does not have the confidence to give an interview. Apparently she is averse to doing homework.

 

Or it could mean she does not have permission to give interviews yet?

 

If she keeps this up she'll blow the debates even worse than her boss did.

2 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Or it could mean she does not have the confidence to give an interview. Apparently she is averse to doing homework.

 

Or it could mean she does not have permission to give interviews yet?

 

If she keeps this up she'll blow the debates even worse than her boss did.

It only means that when they run the numbers, putting her in front of a camera unscripted makes no sense at this point. With a fawning media and millions of adoring fans, why risk it by allowing her to answer questions? She is a bigger gaff machine that Biden ever was, and the less the public knows about her positions, the better. 

 

She said she "might" do an interview before the end of the month. Don't bet on it unless she's trailing in the polls.  

54 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

It only means that when they run the numbers, putting her in front of a camera unscripted makes no sense at this point. With a fawning media and millions of adoring fans, why risk it by allowing her to answer questions? She is a bigger gaff machine that Biden ever was, and the less the public knows about her positions, the better. 

 

She said she "might" do an interview before the end of the month. Don't bet on it unless she's trailing in the polls.  

 

Yes. See my second line. 

4 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

were they taken with a potatoe

2 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

You are destined to give some of the others on here a run for their money re: The master of wit and ready repartee.

listen to the full interview and then comment. otherwise you look kinda stupid

9 hours ago, CallumWK said:

Nothing so blind as a leftie

 

Actually, they simply don't care about the truth.  As long as they get their way, they will happily lie all day long, all while claiming to have the moral high-ground.

Wonder why this photo never made the article... Kamala and her partner in adultery. The only reason she rose in California politics was banging Willie Brown.