16 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

True. If she was anywhere near as wonderful as the Dems propaganda machine is saying it wouldn't be a close race. she'd be waaaaaay ahead in the polls.

 

If Trump is so bad, why is he polling close to the anointed one? She should be way ahead, but she's not. Choosing Clinton was a mistake, and they should have learned the lesson that horrid women don't win, but they chose Harris .

 

She is Trump's best hope for a win, and Trump thanks them for choosing her.

At least choose a woman with a nice voice. Thatcher could speak well.

5 hours ago, pegman said:

It's abortion stupid!!!! Harris will win on that issue alone and it will be not that close. Florida likely to be a squeaker this time and it would not surprise me if she won it. 

Sooooo, you think killing potential human beings is a vote winner? If that's true, something went very wrong in the US. It's like contraceptives never got invented.

 

I support abortion in the first trimester, but it should be for such as rape, incest and contraceptive failure, not as a preferred option.

Just another reason to conclude that western civilisation is doomed.

7 minutes ago, maesariang said:

At least choose a woman with a nice voice. Thatcher could speak well.

People partied and danced in the streets when Thatcher died.

People will party and dance in the street when Harris is defeated.

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by thaibeachlovers

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

People partied and danced in the streets when Thatcher died.

People will party and dance in the street when Harris is defeated.

Thatcher was divisive but could speak normal. Harris can't even put a few sentences together.

32 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Sooooo, you think killing potential human beings is a vote winner? If that's true, something went very wrong in the US. It's like contraceptives never got invented.

 

I support abortion in the first trimester, but it should be for such as rape, incest and contraceptive failure, not as a preferred option.

Just another reason to conclude that western civilisation is doomed.

You keep deflecting from the real issue. It's not about "killing potential human beings," it's about making that choice for yourself.

 

You're entitled to whatever opinion you want, but when it comes to other people's choices - "Mind your own damned business!"

13 hours ago, riclag said:

 No principles ? No wars & legal immigrants  while  cutting out the weaponization of unelected bureaucrats is  worth while grieving !

 the crybaby x Congressperson , is now a political shill fir the cultural Marxist dems.

 

Judging buy your opinion you have no clue about traditional America.

 

Judging by the candidate you favor you have absolutely no clue about traditional America ……when did insulting POWs become acceptable?when did having sex with a porn actress   as your wife stays home and takes care of their infant?when does robbing your own charity become acceptable?when does sexual assault become acceptable?judging by your post you are delusional take off your magga glasses 🤓…….that was a fine informative inclusive hopefull speech and a highly successful convention.its fun seeing the obvious desperation manifest in many of the responses on this thread!   lol 😂 

3 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

And YOUR boy delivers such eloquent speeches about Hannibal Lector being an actual person, or getting electrocuted vs being eaten by a shark. I could go on, but it wouldn't get through your red hat.

 

And remember - you can't spell "red hat" without the word "hatred."

 

We both know when it comes to speeches Trum's entertainment value is unmatched.  The whole world tunes in. 

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

We both know when it comes to speeches Trum's entertainment value is unmatched.  The whole world tunes in. 

Just to laugh AT, not laugh WITH.

44 minutes ago, Tug said:

Judging by the candidate you favor you have absolutely no clue about traditional America ……when did insulting POWs become acceptable?when did having sex with a porn actress   as your wife stays home and takes care of their infant?when does robbing your own charity become acceptable?when does sexual assault become acceptable?judging by your post you are delusional take off your magga glasses 🤓…….that was a fine informative inclusive hopefull speech and a highly successful convention.its fun seeing the obvious desperation manifest in many of the responses on this thread!   lol 😂 

 

Lol, a "fine" and "informative" speech? Really? So what information did Harris provide on how she will pay for her tax cut bribes? Did not hear any info on that. It was a speech high on clichees, but low on actual policy and information.  And that voice, surely I'm not the only one who wants to throw the remote at the TV when she opens her mouth? Not to mention the phony insincerity and fake semi-tearful delivery. What a fake this woman.

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by Cameroni

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

True. If she was anywhere near as wonderful as the Dems propaganda machine is saying it wouldn't be a close race. she'd be waaaaaay ahead in the polls.

 

If Trump is so bad, why is he polling close to the anointed one? She should be way ahead, but she's not. Choosing Clinton was a mistake, and they should have learned the lesson that horrid women don't win, but they chose Harris .

 

She is Trump's best hope for a win, and Trump thanks them for choosing her.

 

I actually agree, had they chosen Michelle Obama or one of the real Democrat stars Trump would have had it much harder. In time, closer to the election, when Harris finally has to face the media and open her phony mouth, when her abysmal prosecutorial record comes under proper scrutiny and the new candidate bonus wears off, Harris' numbers will fall from the current highs.

 

It's still a close election, but Trump can win it against Harris.

8 hours ago, mogandave said:

Best case scenario, she’ll be a continuation of Biden, more likely she’ll run much harder left. 

 

If that’s what you want, vote for Harris. 

 

If that’s not what you want, vote for Trump. 

 

 

You would like Americans to vote for this?

 

 

2 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

You would like Americans to vote for this?

 

 

Yes people in his perverted cult of American carnage do. It defies all decency and reason.

2 hours ago, mdr224 said:

All the liberals here have is their phony leftwing news sources. Nothing based in reality. Americas enemies want the democrats to win

AFAIK Xi, Putin and Kim all want Trump to win. Mainly because they all know he is as thick as two planks. If they are not America's enemies, who is?

6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I actually agree, had they chosen Michelle Obama or one of the real Democrat stars Trump would have had it much harder. In time, closer to the election, when Harris finally has to face the media and open her phony mouth, when her abysmal prosecutorial record comes under proper scrutiny and the new candidate bonus wears off, Harris' numbers will fall from the current highs.

 

It's still a close election, but Trump can win it against Harris.

At the moment she gets a bump from the Trump haters, but when she is revealed as the "empress with no clothes" that may change to neither of the candidates, and then Trump has a very big chance of winning.

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I actually agree, had they chosen Michelle Obama or one of the real Democrat stars Trump would have had it much harder. In time, closer to the election, when Harris finally has to face the media and open her phony mouth, when her abysmal prosecutorial record comes under proper scrutiny and the new candidate bonus wears off, Harris' numbers will fall from the current highs.

 

It's still a close election, but Trump can win it against Harris.

I find your comment moronic.

There was zero chance of Michelle running. 

She had no interest whatsoever  

As far as an open convention of internal division it would have doomed the democrats whoever they picked.

The surprise here is that Harris has stepped into her role brilliantly exceeding all expectations!

I do agree either side could win though.

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

At the moment she gets a bump from the Trump haters, but when she is revealed as the "empress with no clothes" that may change to neither of the candidates, and then Trump has a very big chance of winning.

Dream on buddy.

She's for real.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

AFAIK Xi, Putin and Kim all want Trump to win. Mainly because they all know he is as thick as two planks. If they are not America's enemies, who is?

Trump keeps all those countries in check. Putin wouldnt have invaded ukraine while america had a strong leader

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

AFAIK Xi, Putin and Kim all want Trump to win. Mainly because they all know he is as thick as two planks. If they are not America's enemies, who is?

Obviously.

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

At the moment she gets a bump from the Trump haters, but when she is revealed as the "empress with no clothes" that may change to neither of the candidates, and then Trump has a very big chance of winning.

 

And also the Democrat media bigging up Harris and the "brat" nonsense will all become tiresome, much like Pink's performance at the DNC, which was quite embarassing.

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Dream on buddy.

She's for real.

Kamala is just someone they had to settle for. Nothing more

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by mdr224

2 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

Kamala is just someone they had to settle for. Nothing more

There is some truth there but it turns out she is performing brilliantly and presents as very presidential, very confident, and a WINNER.

 

It's an irrelevant academic question now who would have been nominated in a normal primary process if Biden hadn't run. I would guess Whitmer but it doesn't matter now.

3 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

I find your comment moronic.

There was zero chance of Michelle running. 

She had no interest whatsoever  

As far as an open convention of internal division it would have doomed the democrats whoever they picked.

The surprise here is that Harris has stepped into her role brilliantly exceeding all expectations!

I do agree either side could win though.

 

Well, it's a shame Michelle Obama did not feel enough of a Democrat allegiance to save this race for them, she was by far the best speaker at the DNC. She actually made Walz and Harris look bad. Biden didn't need her for that of course, electric....eh..electoral...lol

 

But yes, circumstances forced the Democrats to pick Harris, you're right.

 

It is indeed a surprise how well the Democrat media machine has built Harris up. But then they made sure to keep Harris away from the press and she made sure to read the lines given to her. Maybe her listening to her handlers better is the Democrat's best chance, as Trump can be his own worst enemy. But as candidates go Harris is a pretty terrible option.

 

But yes, a close election and either can win. I really do feel Harris' numbers will come down closer to November, though. And even now in the swing states Trump and Harris are tied.

1 hour ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Sooooo, you think killing potential human beings is a vote winner? If that's true, something went very wrong in the US. It's like contraceptives never got invented.

 

I support abortion in the first trimester, but it should be for such as rape, incest and contraceptive failure, not as a preferred option.

Just another reason to conclude that western civilisation is doomed.

Have you been pregnant often?

Two things:

nunya

MYOB

1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

There is some truth there but it turns out she is performing brilliantly and presents as very presidential, very confident, and a WINNER.

 

It's an irrelevant academic question now who would have been nominated in a normal primary process if Biden hadn't run. I would guess Whitmer but it doesn't matter now.

Youd be impressed if dems presented a sock puppet at the podium. This woman has no relatability. The black folk i know hate her

8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Well, it's a shame Michelle Obama did not feel enough of a Democrat allegiance to save this race for them, she was by far the best speaker at the DNC. She actually made Walz and Harris look bad. Biden didn't need her for that of course, electric....eh..electoral...lol

 

But yes, circumstances forced the Democrats to pick Harris, you're right.

 

It is indeed a surprise how well the Democrat media machine has built Harris up. But then they made sure to keep Harris away from the press and she made sure to read the lines given to her. Maybe her listening to her handlers better is the Democrat's best chance, as Trump can be his own worst enemy. But as candidates go Harris is a pretty terrible option.

 

But yes, a close election and either can win. I really do feel Harris' numbers will come down closer to November, though. And even now in the swing states Trump and Harris are tied.

I agree Michelle gave the best speech but the Harris did everything she needed to do.

As far as the it will either be close or a Harris landslide. The chance of a Trump landslide is zero.

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by Jingthing

2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

There is some truth there but it turns out she is performing brilliantly and presents as very presidential, very confident, and a WINNER.

 

It's an irrelevant academic question now who would have been nominated in a normal primary process if Biden hadn't run. I would guess Whitmer but it doesn't matter now.

One thing that I am thinking now.

Before I would have said the Dem bench was weak.

After seeing the DNC and hearing the speakers, especially State Reps and governors I think they have a lot of future strong delegates.

1 minute ago, mdr224 said:

Youd be impressed if dems presented a sock puppet at the podium. This woman has no relatability. The black folk i know hate her

Statistically they will vote for her though. I would take a cum rag over Trump but objectively Harris is so far doing brilliantly and if you deny that you're lying.

7 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

One thing that I am thinking now.

Before I would have said the Dem bench was weak.

After seeing the DNC and hearing the speakers, especially State Reps and governors I think they have a lot of future strong delegates.

You were wrong before.

Informed Americans democrats anyway already knew their bench was tremendous.

Edited August 24, 20241 yr by Jingthing

The Magadonians are correct that it's going to get harder for Harris now. Onwards to debates. Stay tuned.

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Statistically they will vote for her though. I would take a cum rag over Trump but objectively Harris is so far doing brilliantly and if you deny that you're lying.

Shes a worse candidate than hillary