Trump trashes Fox News over poll that shows Harris leading in swing states

[maesariang]

Just now, mdr224 said:

The ETFs probably. But bitcoin ETFs just provide so much more ROI, all the gold bugs that have remaining years on their life are switching over to bitcoin ETFS

Some good tech etfs as well.

[Fairynuff]

20 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Says a guy on the internet. When did you own golf courses, planes and become President? Tall poppy syndrome.

I’m not a grifter. He is.

[Lacessit]

7 minutes ago, maesariang said:

What imo is the best way to buy gold?

Pool allocated. Zero storage cost.

[maesariang]

Just now, Fairynuff said:

I’m not a grifter. He is.

He looks like a winner to me. 

[Hanuman2547]

I'm not surprised at all by his response.  This is typical Trump behavior.

[earlinclaifornia]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

The only thing keeping Trump going at this point is the thought of staying out of Jail. If he loses on November 5, he's toast, and he knows it.

 

His problem is lack of funds to run a real campaign. He has been using his campaign donations to pay his lawyers, not much left to hire staffers and open campaign offices.

 

Cities where he holds rallies have had enough of his deadbeat ways. Erie demanded payment up front for the next rally he holds there.

 

It's telling the poor polls are coming out of Fox, who previously has been blatantly partisan.

If any of the summary pollsters include Rasmussen they lean Right 84%.

Makes Fox News polling look more likely than I think.

[earlinclaifornia]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

I had to check whether I had you already in my stupid post competition.

 

Congratulations, you're in.

Ate the dust by me yesterday. Foolish is the nicest way to describe his posts

[Scouse123]

12 minutes ago, maesariang said:

You sound very bitter. Hope I never get like that.

 

I think the bars are probably open, why don't you toddle off to your bar stool and tell everyone about how Trump is going to win.

 

Have a Chang, go on, you know you want to.

 

BYE.

[Lacessit]

23 minutes ago, maesariang said:

Says a guy on the internet. When did you own golf courses, planes and become President? Tall poppy syndrome.

Never. I don't own a felon mug shot either.

 

You own something when it is unencumbered by debt. He's in debt up to his eyebrows.

 

Why do you think there is not one bank in America that will lend him money?

[Fairynuff]

5 minutes ago, maesariang said:

He looks like a winner to me. 

Horses wear blinkers too.

[herfiehandbag]

18 minutes ago, maesariang said:

You sound bitter. 

Or accurate?

[earlinclaifornia]

57 minutes ago, luckymitchell said:

I seem to remember quite a few here saying polls didn't matter, that was when they showed Trump ahead, that seems to have changed suddenly.  

You imagined that. Trump had close to a six point lead

Harris has 3-5

Trends count

[herfiehandbag]

10 minutes ago, maesariang said:

He looks like a winner to me. 

Should have gone to Specsavers!

[earlinclaifornia]

53 minutes ago, Wrwest said:

Oops, forgot to post the credible source of this post?

Cult leader told him this is what to post

Edited September 2 by earlinclaifornia

[maesariang]

7 minutes ago, Fairynuff said:

Horses wear blinkers too.

Thanks Fairynuff.

[Cameroni]

"MSNBC host Chris Hayes erupted in frustration on Friday after new polls indicated that former President Donald Trump could secure a victory in the Electoral College, despite trailing Vice President Kamala Harris in the national popular vote. Hayes, the anchor of “All In with Chris Hayes,” took to social media to criticize the Electoral College, calling it a “suicide pact” in a scathing post.

 

The latest polling data, released by prominent pollster Nate Silver, showed Trump leading in the Electoral College while Harris would win the popular vote if the election were held today."

 

https://www.businessupturn.com/usa/chris-hayes-criticizes-electoral-college-after-trump-gains-poll-lead/49676/

[maesariang]

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

"MSNBC host Chris Hayes erupted in frustration on Friday after new polls indicated that former President Donald Trump could secure a victory in the Electoral College, despite trailing Vice President Kamala Harris in the national popular vote. Hayes, the anchor of “All In with Chris Hayes,” took to social media to criticize the Electoral College, calling it a “suicide pact” in a scathing post.

 

The latest polling data, released by prominent pollster Nate Silver, showed Trump leading in the Electoral College while Harris would win the popular vote if the election were held today."

 

https://www.businessupturn.com/usa/chris-hayes-criticizes-electoral-college-after-trump-gains-poll-lead/49676/

I have Harris 0.2 to 0.5 points ahead nationally. So Trump wins on states. 

[maesariang]

Just now, mdr224 said:

I dont follow gold but bitcoins bullrun is just beginning. Do not fade

2 years ago many said btc was finished it went up. Now many say buy. Usually the majority are wrong.

[Lacessit]

2 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

Look at the chart and what happens every time theres an election. Orange man pumps orange coin. Kamala winning would scare people into buying. Either way bitcoin will win

Bitcoin is a cult. Like most cults, it's the leaders who do best out of it.

 

Please tell me the difference between believing in a god one cannot see, touch or hear, and a stream of electrons in cyberspace one cannot see, touch, or hear.

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, luckymitchell said:

I seem to remember quite a few here saying polls didn't matter, that was when they showed Trump ahead, that seems to have changed suddenly.  

I was the one who said that early polls are not significant, wait until Labor Day.

 

Guess what?

[cdemundo]

3 hours ago, stupidfarang said:

No one ever thought he would get in the first time, I would not bet that he is losing not until the final count is in. Just to be clear I hope he never gets in as it will not be good for the USA or the world. 

Spot on.

The polls are not accurate enough to go by.

It's almost a curse to be ahead in the polls as in discourages some people (to quote Obama) to " get out of their fuzzy slippers and vote".

[Fairynuff]

1 hour ago, mdr224 said:

Are you saying the left doesnt love muslims and want them in their countries?

No he’s just saying not everyone is a fascist.

[maesariang]

Just now, Fairynuff said:

No he’s just saying not everyone is a fascist.

Ever been to Saudi Arabia?

[Patong2021]

2 hours ago, maesariang said:

Looks easy to me

 

Your invented numbers do not line up with the reality. Putting in a % means nothing if the  data sets are not declared.

The number of people who believe Trump is a crook is +23.5%. See what I did?

 

[maesariang]

2 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Your invented numbers do not line up with the reality. Putting in a % means nothing if the  data sets are not declared.

The number of people who believe Trump is a crook is +23.5%. See what I did?

 

Lol at the deflection

 

[cdemundo]

2 hours ago, maesariang said:

Looks easy to me

Made up numbers.

For example the current inflation rate is 2.9%.

These numbers without explanation and analysis mean next to nothing.

 

"Looks easy to me"

The key to Trumpism; individuals who want easy answers to complex problems.

 

Edited September 2 by cdemundo

[maesariang]

1 minute ago, cdemundo said:

Made up numbers.

For example the current inflation rate is 2.9%.

These numbers without explanation and analysis mean next to nothing.

 

So you don't know that inflation compounds. Got it.

[Captain Flack]

I have removed multiple off topic posts and replies. This discussion is not about bitcoin, the topic is ‘Trump trashes Fox News over poll that shows Harris leading in swing states’

 

If you want to debate bitcoin start a new topic in the correct section and not hijack other topics.

[cdemundo]

15 minutes ago, maesariang said:

So you don't know that inflation compounds. Got it.

 

Compounding occurs over time, you don't specify any intervals for your numbers.

Changes of any kind require a start and end time, you provide none.

Just "Trump" and "Biden".

Silly.

 

Just a glimpse at the complexity of one of the numbers you quote.

But as you say, it looks easy to you.

 

"Were Gas Prices Under Trump Lower?"

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2024/07/12/were-gas-prices-under-trump-lower/

Edited September 2 by cdemundo

[maesariang]

4 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

 

Compounding occurs over time, you don't specify any intervals for your numbers.

Changes of any kind require a start and end time, you provide none.

Just "Trump" and "Biden".

Silly.

 

Inflation can be measured monthly but we mostly look at annual prices. Biden had the worst figures since the 1970s.