Huw Edwards given suspended sentence over indecent images of children

[Chomper Higgot]

2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Check the Saville report findings. Systemic failures. 

Does the Huw Edwards case get a mention in the Saville Report is that you doing a bit of time travel?

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Back it up?

 

Your posts are open for everyone to read. 

Then you should have no problem at all producing a post by me in which I ‘shill for Huw’.

 

Give it your best go.

[JonnyF]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Then you should have no problem at all producing a post by me in which I ‘shill for Huw’.

 

Give it your best go.

 

Seems like you have no problem (ostensibly) criticizing Huu in an attempt to get some initial credibility on the subject but then you will fight to the bitter end for those enabling him.

 

Entirely consistent with your irritating presence on this forum. 

 

I will be polite and say it is predictably hypocritical and distasteful. 🤢

[Chomper Higgot]

7 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Seems like you have no problem (ostensibly) criticizing Huu in an attempt to get some initial credibility on the subject but then you will fight to the bitter end for those enabling him.

 

Entirely consistent with your irritating presence on this forum. 

 

I will be polite and say it is predictably hypocritical and distasteful. 🤢

So that’s a no then.

 

You don’t have any evidence to back your claim of me shilling for a Huw Edwards, a convicted pervert.

 

Your ‘distasteful slur is once again wholly without basis.

 

 

 

 

[NowNow]

On 9/17/2024 at 4:44 AM, NanLaew said:

 

Not for chief magistrate Paul Goldspring, apparently.

 

Also, my understanding that from the moment he was arrested and charged until now, Huw Edwards hasn't spent a single minute in police detention or incarceration but rather in a "mental health facility".

 

Also note that when he was first publicly identified for these crimes, the following occurred,

 

"Minutes before the family statement was published, a separate update was issued by the Met, which has been assessing the allegations in recent days after discussions with BBC executives.

 

It said: "Detectives from the Met's Specialist Crime Command have now concluded their assessment and have determined there is no information to indicate that a criminal offence has been committed."

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66180799

 

The wagons were circled way back last summer and the judge has made sure that the circle remains unbroken.

 

As for this shameful defense that he didn't make them, sell them, share them but deleted them as some sort of mitigation? How about the guy who they arrested on suspicion of planning to shoot Trump? Will a defense of "Sure it's my gun, but I didn't use it" work for him?

 

You are British, it's defence 😊

What is the crime? That he's attracted to teenage boys? AFAIK, a teenage boy sent him the photos in the first place. 

There was the policewoman who simply opened a file that was forwarded to her. She lost her job over it.

Shameful defence? What if I sent you such media? It simply being on your phone makes you a criminal. Do you agree with that?

I say thank goodness that he didn't ruin any young person's life by molesting them.  He has to live with the shame of everyone knowing. Isn't that enough?

 

[Nick Carter icp]

6 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

 

There was the policewoman who simply opened a file that was forwarded to her. She lost her job over it

 

 

   Could you provide a link to that claim ?

[NowNow]

9 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Could you provide a link to that claim ?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/26/police-officer-robyn-williams-sentenced-unpaid-work-possessing-child-abuse-video

[Nick Carter icp]

9 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/26/police-officer-robyn-williams-sentenced-unpaid-work-possessing-child-abuse-video

 

   She resigned from her job after her sister had sent her the video and then she had all charges against her dropped

 

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceq3xw37jdqo

[connda]

Back to two-tiered justice.
One tier for commoners, in other words, prison.
Another tier for "special people," in other words parole or special prisons - like hospital penthouse suites.  Dude's a "special person" with connections sooooo, parole and a hand-slap.

[NowNow]

5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   She resigned from her job after her sister had sent her the video and then she had all charges against her dropped

 

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ceq3xw37jdqo

 

You should learn to read. Otherwise you end up posting a load of rubbish. The article you have posted is with regard to a related but entirely different case. Pathetic.

 

Quote

She was dismissed from the Metropolitan Police after a disciplinary hearing in March 2020 found her conviction amounted to gross misconduct.

But in 2021 she successfully appealed against the decision to dismiss her following her conviction and was reinstated as a police officer.

 

She resigned AFTER she was reinstated.

[NowNow]

On 9/17/2024 at 2:54 AM, JonnyF said:

 

He exchanged them for 'gifts'.

 

In other words, he bought images of 7-9 year old boys being sexually abused. 

 

But he works for the BBC, he's a celebrity. So no jail for Huw. 

 

There was ONE image of a 7 to 9 year old, after which he told the sender to no send any more of children so young.

You've been caught out lying and exaggerating so many times now.

[Nick Carter icp]

9 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

You should learn to read. Otherwise you end up posting a load of rubbish. The article you have posted is with regard to a related but entirely different case. Pathetic.

 

 

She resigned AFTER she was reinstated.

 

  It was the same case , 

   As I said, she resigned , her original sacking was revoked and she continued working as a police officer , she then resigned 

[NowNow]

8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  It was the same case , 

   As I said, she resigned , her original sacking was revoked and she continued working as a police officer , she then resigned 

 

No, don't be obtuse. She was dismissed. Then she appealed and was reinstated. Don't you have any ability to read and comprehend? If not, perhaps you should refrain from commenting at all.

Back to the topic. Someone simply sending you a pic/video. You might not know what it contains before it was sent.

[Nick Carter icp]

Just now, NowNow said:

 

No, don't be obtuse. She was dismissed. Then she appealed and was reinstated. Don't you have any ability to read and comprehend?

 

   That is what I said, we are both saying the same thing 

[NowNow]

Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   That is what I said, we are both saying the same thing 

 

No, that is not what you said and you are still wrong about it being the same case. Either way, I don't want to discuss it with you any longer. You are just posting nonsense and distracting from the topic.

[Nick Carter icp]

5 minutes ago, NowNow said:

Back to the topic. Someone simply sending you a pic/video. You might not know what it contains before it was sent.

 

   The jury didn't believe that she didn't know what was on the video , also she didn't report the video to the authorities .

   Had she immediately  informed the authorities about the video, then I doubt whether they would have taken any action against her 

[Nick Carter icp]

3 minutes ago, NowNow said:

 

No, that is not what you said 

 

   It is indeed what I said 

Could you point out the difference, as I cannot see any difference at all 

[NowNow]

47 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   The jury didn't believe that she didn't know what was on the video , also she didn't report the video to the authorities .

   Had she immediately  informed the authorities about the video, then I doubt whether they would have taken any action against her 

 

I wrote.....BEFORE it was sent. If you are to say that once it is on your device, you have become a sex offender.

Perhaps alerting the authorities would have implicated her sister, who allegedly sent it to her, about which follow up on.

The point being that she was labelled a sex offender.

 

On the surface of it, that seems harsh.

Edited 1 hour ago by NowNow