Thai police shut down 21 villas on Koh Samui, foreigners evicted

[Patong2021]

3 minutes ago, Umlungu said:

So what happens next? Bulldoze the lot and reinstate the hill environment to its oiginal state? doubt it. Who would pay for that?

 

The developer  is expected to  pay, but  it is the local municipality budget that pays.

[Umlungu]

12 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

A much 'lightened' wallet too.

I bought, built and sold.  Made money AND I have lived rent free for 24 years and counting.

I even get revenue for the ones that I haven't sold.

Yeh, sure - buying is for mugs

Had a house built, lived in it for 8 years, sold at 2.5mb net profit. 

[NorthernRyland]

6 hours ago, kwilco said:

I believe the basic law in Thailand is that any land that has an incline of over 19% is automatically property of the crown - so any building on land like that either has special permission (e.g. Temples) or is illegal.

 

I can think of many structures on steeper land but somehow they get approval. It seems often once somebody gets in for whatever reason and builds something they virtually never pull it down so there's an incentive to pay bribes and build before a higher authority finds out. Samui is just too high profile to get away with it so easily. Also the gradient is 30% I think.

[kwilco]

32 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

I can think of many structures on steeper land but somehow they get approval. It seems often once somebody gets in for whatever reason and builds something they virtually never pull it down so there's an incentive to pay bribes and build before a higher authority finds out. Samui is just too high profile to get away with it so easily. Also the gradient is 30% I think.

"I can think of many structures on steeper land" - I don't think you could actually name them. the rule is  that  a gradient / slope more than 19 degrees or 35%: Building (or modification of existing) is not permitted!

 

As I said there may be exceptions granted on behalf of the crown - temples being the main example.

On Samui this has long been a problem though down to corruption.

I think there was some retro dispensation given to some building as well.....but I'd like to hear your examples.

 

THailand is one country where I've seen a lot of buildings knocked down after planning law breaches - specifically jungle encroachment seems an example.

THere is also the problem with long-term derelict buildings where construction has stopped for one reason or another.

 

Edited 18 hours ago by kwilco

[theblether]

How old are these villas? 

[BusyB]

8 hours ago, wwest5829 said:

I fear you have been reading too much of the posts concerning the upcoming U.S. elections. The tone, outlook would fit right in with the ridiculous anger venting … jai yen, yen  (not meant as a criticism, just an observation out of concern …).

 

I've been hanging around this forum since 2004 or so, before joining in 2009.

 

Believe me, hang 'em high is nothing in the least bit new on AN (once Thai Visa). It well predates the US election 555.

Edited 17 hours ago by BusyB

[baansgr]

Par for the course with Samui, this kind of thing dates back 20 years ago with the Bandidos and numerous agents selling land that should not be built on. Real chanotes issued illegally along with phoney planning permission. So many people don't realise the properties they have bought are not legal and can be torn down at anytime.

[Tailwagsdog]

Good Lesson here, if you are buying make sure your Thai Lawyer does the property search, checks the Title, checks building permit, encumbrances, easements, etc ...not just settle and take a few ....Caveat Emptor

[phetphet]

15 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

The development is right on the border of Tambon Bophut. I had to check that one as well.

 

That original road was supposed to go to a country club that was to be built. Not sure exactly where. After a bit of legal argy bargy it was found that the land was forestry commission land and so the club was cancelled but the road was great for the locals for exercise.

The gate was always locked back then, but folk would park cars on front of the gate and bikes could negotiate a ditch and park inside. They then cleared some land and made the car park. The rest is history.

I was surprised when the Black Rabbit was built. Before that it was a wooden shack balanced on the edge of the drop, where you could buy refreshments etc after the steep hike up.

 

I like the thought that folk were taking guns up there. Isn't the Black Rabbit run by Russians???

 

15 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

The development is right on the border of Tambon Bophut. I had to check that one as well.

 

That original road was supposed to go to a country club that was to be built. Not sure exactly where. After a bit of legal argy bargy it was found that the land was forestry commission land and so the club was cancelled but the road was great for the locals for exercise.

The gate was always locked back then, but folk would park cars on front of the gate and bikes could negotiate a ditch and park inside. They then cleared some land and made the car park. The rest is history.

I was surprised when the Black Rabbit was built. Before that it was a wooden shack balanced on the edge of the drop, where you could buy refreshments etc after the steep hike up.

 

I like the thought that folk were taking guns up there. Isn't the Black Rabbit run by Russians???

There is yet another new road up there. Starts just before the original one turns to go up to the Black Rabbit, and runs parallel to it. Looks like it is heading to those villas being built before Replay.

 

Before it became Black Rabbit, it was no longer just a shack. It was a nice looking little coffee shop with fantastic views. It was up for sale for quite a while, and then became the Black Rabbit.

There is also a nice looking house up there. Well not so much the house, but the owner, Thai I presume has cleared all the land in front to make a large, sloped garden with large rocks peppered all over. He must have fantastic views across to Koh Phangan.

[Tropicalevo]

deleted

Edited 7 hours ago by Tropicalevo

[Tropicalevo]

1 hour ago, baansgr said:

Par for the course with Samui, this kind of thing dates back 20 years ago with the Bandidos and numerous agents selling land that should not be built on. Real chanotes issued illegally along with phoney planning permission. So many people don't realise the properties they have bought are not legal and can be torn down at anytime.

 

Once the property is more than 10 years old, 'squatter's rights' seems to apply.

They do not knock the houses down, just revoke land titles.

A couple of examples (there are many more here) -

 

The developer here had a nice plot of land - agricultural purposes only.

He built a small house (for free) for a Thai family to live there. Free utilities.

After 10 years, they applied to have the land re-designated as nor sor sam.

Successful.

The Thais moved on, the developer developed and sold the property.

 

A neighbour bought two plots of land (One facing east, one west) built a big FU property on top of the hill behind me.

Three pools, gym, sauna etc etc

One section of the land is illegal. Forged chanote.

Half of his house is legal (west facing) the other half is illegal.

He has just lost the first appeal against the government. Final appeal in a year or three.

When he loses that (and he will - even his lawyer says so) he can still have the house. (> than 10 years old).

Revoked land title and he cannot pass the house on when he dies, nor sell it. Peppercorn rent for the illegal land.

 

TIT

 

Edited 6 hours ago by Tropicalevo

[kwilco]

16 hours ago, NorthernRyland said:

I can think of many structures on steeper land but somehow they get approval. It seems often once somebody gets in for whatever reason and builds something they virtually never pull it down so there's an incentive to pay bribes and build before a higher authority finds out. Samui is just too high profile to get away with it so easily. Also the gradient is 30% I think.

Where???? I'm not saying that there aren't but you cannot come up with any examples....this is 35% incline....I think you haven't actually cindidered this but are just making a nape of the neck assumption.

 

And Samui HAS got away with it before...just do some research there has been more than one scandal associated with this in the past.

Edited 1 hour ago by kwilco