Jump to content



Why do decent Americans support trump


xylophone

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

As a Centrist Democrat Harris is not my first choice for president.

 

However she is not a convicted felon.

 

She is not suggesting huge tax hikes on the American people in the form of insane and poorly conceived tariffs on imported goods. 

 

She is not a career criminal, who has made a fortune off the backs of good, hard working Americans, who are small contractors and have had the great misfortune to deal with Trump.

 

She is not a scam artist and a huckster.

 

She is not a racist.

 

She has not had five enormous bankruptcies, where she's walked away from many billions of dollars in debt. Nor has she had five deferments from serving her nation. 

 

She does not belittle veterans and the military and scorn their service to their country. 

 

She actually pays income tax, like most decent Americans. 

 

She does not despise immigrants, who have helped to build America.

 

She's a decent human being, she's not a hater, and nor is she a clown. She is not of average intelligence. 

 

She's not a predator nor has she ever been accused of sexual assault, or paying people hush money. 

 

And she's not a pathological liar, that's enough reason for her getting my vote. 

tell us you suffer from the acronym without telling us you suffer from the acronym!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It isn't nonsense, though.  What you have written is nonsense.

 

 

Do you have the link?

 

As I said, this is just you believing propaganda.  You asked why "decent Americans" support Trump, this is the answer.  The things you think that are bad about him are not true, and you only believe them because you dislike Trump on a personal level.

he is also a Kiwi,

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Ah because you !!!! do not agree I'm wrong. I don't consider the Kremlin a tourist attraction.

so, you made a statement, someone disagreed, they're kremlin stoog... gotcha... you massive L. O  S E.. .work the rest out im sure

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, xylophone said:

There are links aplenty all over the Internet from all sorts of networks, newspapers and other sources of news and information, and if you haven't seen them before, then it truly says so much about you and why we are even having this discussion.

 

I don't believe propaganda and I research any sources which it would appear that you don't do.

 

It is extremely sad in this day and age that you refuse to believe that which is widely reported by all and sundry, and which can be widely viewed. In fact it goes to show that what many others have said about trumpies, in as much as they refuse to believe that which doesn't fit their narrative.

 

Keep drinking the Kool-Aid because you need to stay in that fantasy world that you inhabit at the moment.

 

FYI..............

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PX9reO3QnUA

Donald Trump mocks reporter with disability – video

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/nov/26/donald-trump-appears-to-mock-disabled-reporter-video

 

https://www.politico.com/video/2017/01/donald-trump-mocks-disabled-reporter-061897

 

Donald Trump's Worst Offense? Mocking Disabled Reporter, Poll Finds

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-s-worst-offense-mocking-disabled-reporter-poll-finds-n627736

 

Republican presidential contender Donald Trump has been criticised for mocking a disabled New York Times reporter.

Mr Trump performed an impression of Serge Kovaleski, who suffers from a congenital joint condition, at a rally.

He has used a 2001 article by Mr Kovaleski to back up widely disputed claims that "thousands" of Muslims in New Jersey celebrated the 9/11 attacks.

 

The New York Times called Mr Trump's actions "outrageous".

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-34930042 

ever heard of circular reporting? google it, also google 'gullible' then search images, you will see your face

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

It's a link to some FOX News moron inventing a story.

 

There weren't a lot of people calling Gerald Ford a Fascist.

Oh my, more name calling, panic must be in the air.  Check out polymarket today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You're normalizing an election that is the OPPOSITE of normal.
Trump is running to be America's first dictator King and if he wins and makes the changes he's on record as wanting to make (and can now legally make them with no guardrails and immunity from the supreme court) real elections are over.
 

i think you need a diaper change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

You don't get it. Trump doesn't do much actual work. His people will do that work. Their plans are completely clear and like I said at this point completely legal and possible.

Why didn't he and his people do that last time?
THEY TRIED.

But last time they had people to keep him in check and the supreme court hadn't passed the immunity rules then.

Of course he came very close to taking power in an election that he lost.

That in itself should be 100 percent disqualifying to all decent Americans.

A shorthand key to the mechanics of their plan is SCHEDULE F.

That is the key to gutting the government all agencies of expert and experienced people to be replaced by ignorant loyalists.

There is also the oligarch system which Trump is copying from Putin.

Musk, Theil, etc.

Doesn't matter if you call this fascism, autocracy, or whatever, it means the death of American democracy as there won't be real elections after they do this stuff.

Also of course Trump is mortal but these measures are designed to be in place for all his successors.

Anne Applebaum a scholar of autocracy who I suggest all decent Americans follow, says if Trump takes power for a second term American democracy is DEFINITELY dead for at least a generation.

I think she's optimistic as how do you get it back once it's lost?

highly emotional paranoia, i think prozac might help with that, , but there is not cure for the derangement syndrome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

"Said in 2015 he'll replace Obama care with a great new plan in 4 weeks. 9 Years later says he still only has a concept at the Trump/Harris debate.".

 

That's pretty sad.

pretty sad is your avatar, but i guess its better than a 'BLM', 'i'm vaccinated' or a 'Ukraine' one. was fun reading the comments, but enough now, time to sleep, let me know if/when you find that proof of fascist dictator, El' Trumpo you were going to show me yesterday., i wont hold my breath though.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2024 at 1:34 AM, bangadang said:

Oh great, another left rant. Why not throw Hitler into it as well?  

 

It was a recitation of  facts.

 

 

On 10/29/2024 at 1:47 AM, bangadang said:


Because when it says, "Why do you throw your support behind a convicted felon?" when everyone who has half a brain cell knows the charges were political, it doesn't warrant a rebuttal. It is just a farce and Dem word salad. Why bring up his wife? Was Harris just playing tiddlywinks with Mayor Willie? Give it a rest? The hypocrisy of it all!

 

Trump was convicted on 34 felony charges.  You term the charges "political". It does not matter, as Trump was charged with dishonest acts that violated  the law. To argue otherwise is to say that the law should not apply to anyone who engages in bribery, and makes false accounting regulatory filings.

Did he or did he not engage in the legal acts?

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frank83628 said:

ok, i hear ya, but after all you just said stuff about 'a Woman's body',  Tim Walz wants to put tampons in boys bathrooms, so can you explain that?

Yes. It's a Fox bullsh!t misdirection, but you already knew that.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Patong2021 said:

 

You never ever respond to the actual statement. Instead you go off on a tangent and offer insults.

Yup, it's always one or more of their response styles:

(D) eny

(I) gnore

(L) ie

(D) eflect

(O) bfuscate

The truth would expose them for the fools they are.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mogandave said:

But they were going to hang Mike Pense ( we saw the gallows)  and Trump was going to make Putin his VP, and then Trump would step down, Putin would be President, and Trump woukd go back to Moscow for more hookers and golden showers. 

I think Mike Pence is too tall for this gallows.   No trap door in it either!

Is that thing named Art?

 

"

FBI Director Debunks Biden’s Claim That J6 ‘Gallows’ Were Designed to Hang Mike Pence

 

'It looks like a prop. The construction doesn’t look like it would lend itself to hanging somebody...'"

 

https://headlineusa.com/fbi-director-debunks-bidens-claim-that-j6-gallows-were-designed-to-hang-mike-pence/

 



Opinion | Alejandro Mayorkas: How my DHS will combat domestic extremism - The Washington Post

Edited by radiochaser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SleepyJoe said:

Oh my, more name calling, panic must be in the air.  Check out polymarket today.  

Polymarket?

 

Not only is it rigged - but US citizens are banned from using it.

 

What value do you think there is in predicting an election by using the opinions of people who can't vote in that election?

 

https://fortune.com/crypto/2024/10/30/polymarket-trump-election-crypto-wash-trading-researchers/

 

MAGA  🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now