Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, mogandave said:

I have no idea if the judge is honorable, and I have no idea if he’s lying, nor do you. 

 

All we know is that he is being paid to bash Trump on TV. 

 

If he supported Trump, he would not be on TV or getting paid. 

I gave you a laugh, your excuses get even more ridiculous.............🤣

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, transam said:

I gave you a laugh, your excuses get even more ridiculous.............🤣

Yes, you provide a lot of laughs. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, mogandave said:

Yes, you provide a lot of laughs. 

Thanks, I do try, but you win, hands down........🤭

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 4:18 PM, tomazbodner said:

Would it be even more stupid comment if I informed you that Trump has 4 children with immigrants, 1 of them even using Czech name Ivanka, while his vice presidential candidate pal has an Indian wife and son named Vivek?

 

Yes, they absolutely hate immigrants...

There is a big difference between legal and illegal, I have no problem with legal immigration 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, flexomike said:

There is a big difference between legal and illegal, I have no problem with legal immigration 

 

How about international law?

  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 4:24 PM, Danderman123 said:

So, you don't care about Trump letting in 3 million illegals.

 

Obviously, for you, the problem isn't the illegals, it's who lets them in.

 

Did you know that Biden has deported more illegals than Trump?

Well he let in more than three times as many so that only makes sense 

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, flexomike said:

Well he let in more than three times as many so that only makes sense 

 

Don't you get sick of obvious lies? How many did he "let in"? He really , really honest here.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
On 11/2/2024 at 10:41 AM, Danderman123 said:

Trumpers are programmed not to answer questions. Evasion is their method.

 

Evasion is also a common trolling tactic.

 

After Trump loses, a lot of trolls will disappear, which will make this a more pleasant and useful discussion board.

 

BTW, I have no idea what @G_Money is talking about with his proving me wrong stuff. I get 100+ notifications a day, so I might have missed his comment.

Kamala is the master of not answering questions, must have learned from Trumpers 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, flexomike said:

There is a big difference between legal and illegal, I have no problem with legal immigration 

Go inspect Melania's immigration and work history...

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 12:30 AM, Danderman123 said:

I have to admit, those guys are smarter than the group of Nazis who surrounded Hitler. Goering, Hess, Borman and their peers were not too bright.

 

The exception being Goebbels who originated a lot of material being recycled by Trump.

During the Nuremberg Trials after WWII, several high-ranking Nazi officials underwent IQ testing as part of psychological evaluations. Here are some of the reported IQ scores:

  1. Hermann Göring: 138
  2. Rudolf Hess: 120
  3. Hans Frank: 130
  4. Albert Speer: 128
  5. Joachim von Ribbentrop: 129
  6. Wilhelm Keitel: 129
  7. Ernst Kaltenbrunner: 113
  8. Alfred Rosenberg: 127
  9. Karl Dönitz: 138
  10. Franz von Papen: 134
  11. Arthur Seyss-Inquart: 141
  12. Alfred Jodl: 127
  13. Baldur von Schirach: 130
  14. Fritz Sauckel: 118
Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 12:30 AM, Danderman123 said:

I have to admit, those guys are smarter than the group of Nazis who surrounded Hitler. Goering, Hess, Borman and their peers were not too bright.

 

The exception being Goebbels who originated a lot of material being recycled by Trump.

During the Nuremberg Trials after WWII, several high-ranking Nazi officials underwent IQ testing as part of psychological evaluations. Here are some of the reported IQ scores: Hermann Goring 138, Rudolf Hess 120, Hans Frank 130, Albert Speer 128, Seyss-Inquart 141, Alfred Rosenberg 127.

Posted
On 11/1/2024 at 2:23 AM, MalcolmB said:

Nah, never been there.

too dangerous with all their guns and they are stark raving mad.

There is no evidence that guns have made San Francisco dangerous. After all, there were plenty of guns around in San Francisco when I was growing up there and it was a very safe city.

Posted (edited)
On 11/1/2024 at 12:16 AM, Lacessit said:

I said average. Obviously, statistics and the concept of outliers is not in your skill set.

And backing your allegations up with evidence is not yours.

Edited by oslooskar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...