Media doesn't need to lie to turn me against Trump.

[cdemundo]

A great number of reports are saying that Trump said he wants to put Liz Chaney in front of a firing squad.

This is an out and out lie.

 

He clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

 

I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without

distorting and lying about what he said.

[pattayasan]

 

What was Trump's motive in invoking shooting in relation to political opponents twice in two days?

[cdemundo]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

What was Trump's motive in invoking shooting in relation to political opponents twice in two days?

Let me reiterate in case your response means you didn't understand what I said.

 

He (Trump) clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, cdemundo said:

Let me reiterate in case your response means you didn't understand what I said.

 

He (Trump) clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

 

I don't care what he was not talking about, I want to know what he was talking about, in both cases. What was his motive in invoking shooting twice in two days in reference to opponents?

[cdemundo]

4 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I don't care what he was not talking about, I want to know what he was talking about, in both cases. What was his motive in invoking shooting twice in two days in reference to opponents?

"I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without distorting and lying about what he said."

 

Apparently you have adopted the mores of the Trump camp where it is OK to lie to attack your opponent.

OK you are OK with lying like Trumpsters do.

As I have said (which again you apparently missed) there is plenty to criticize Trump about without distorting and lying about what he said.

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, cdemundo said:

"I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without distorting and lying about what he said."

 

Apparently you have adopted the mores of the Trump camp where it is OK to lie to attack your opponent.

OK you are OK with lying like Trumpsters do.

As I have said (which again you apparently missed) there is plenty to criticize Trump about without distorting and lying about what he said.

 

All anybody on his side have said in his defense is that he wasn't talking about shooting his opponents. so what was he talking about and why was it necessary to invoke a shooting? Nobody on Trump's side seems to be able to articulate what he really meant and why he couldn't have used some imagery that didn't involve guns.

[0ffshore360]

11 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

A great number of reports are saying that Trump said he wants to put Liz Chaney in front of a firing squad.

This is an out and out lie.

 

He clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

 

I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without

distorting and lying about what he said.

I agree that reports of twisted interpretations of Trump's rants are not excusable but nor are the continuous repetitions of his disgustingly bogus claims that junior schools are operating as agents for gender reassignments in secret etc !

The abandonment of accountability for false statements across the social spectrum has become akin to a disease !

Although Trump has now regressed so much that some of  his diatribe has become so gibberish it has legitimately become open to wild speculation and interpretation !

 

 

 

[BangkokReady]

19 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

I don't care what he was not talking about, I want to know what he was talking about, in both cases. What was his motive in invoking shooting twice in two days in reference to opponents?

 

In the Cheney case, he was criticising her sending American soldiers off to fight in unnecessary wars while she faces none of the danger, one of his key campaign issues.

 

What was the other comment that mentioned guns?

[frank83628]

31 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

What was Trump's motive in invoking shooting in relation to political opponents twice in two days?

you have been given the context of what was said about Liz Cheny. yet here you are, spouting the same incorrect crap AGAIN! you just point blank refuse to accept anything other that what you believe. and you say Trumps supporters are in a cult!

[frank83628]

30 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I don't care what he was not talking about, I want to know what he was talking about, in both cases. What was his motive in invoking shooting twice in two days in reference to opponents?

as the saying goes, you can't argue with stupid..

[0ffshore360]

6 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

In the Cheney case, he was criticising her sending American soldiers off to fight in unnecessary wars while she faces none of the danger, one of his key campaign issues.

 

What was the other comment that mentioned guns?

Can you  deny the hypocritical irony in that when Trump avoided Service and is on record expressing negative opinion over military casualties etc ?

[0ffshore360]

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

you have been given the context of what was said about Liz Cheny. yet here you are, spouting the same incorrect crap AGAIN! you just point blank refuse to accept anything other that what you believe. and you say Trumps supporters are in a cult!

I have DIL in South Carolina that is both an Evangelical religious pawn and a devotee to Trump.

One of many Cultists !

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

Can you  deny the hypocritical irony in that when Trump avoided Service and is on record expressing negative opinion over military casualties etc ?

 

The irony of Trump having an anti-war stance while avoiding war?  I don't see any irony there.  Do you?

[frank83628]

10 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

In the Cheney case, he was criticising her sending American soldiers off to fight in unnecessary wars while she faces none of the danger, one of his key campaign issues.

 

What was the other comment that mentioned guns?

Trump was talking about the bullet proof glass he was standing behind and that if someone was going to try assassinate him again the media would get it first, as they were in front of him, he said something like 'i don't mind that', i haven't heard it all or exactly what was said but again, he didn't call for the media to be shot, just another derangement crew twisting the words, no doubt will find the unedited clip on X later and post it.

 

 

[0ffshore360]

1 minute ago, BangkokReady said:

 

The irony of Trump having an anti-war stance while avoiding war?  I don't see any irony there.  Do you?

But has repeatedly suggested  using the despicable Military to oust his political critics and more?

Ok. Balanced  opinion not !

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, 0ffshore360 said:

But has repeatedly suggested  using the despicable Military to oust his political critics and more?

Ok. Balanced  opinion not !

 

When has he done any of that???

[BangkokReady]

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Trump was talking about the bullet proof glass he was standing behind and that if someone was going to try assassinate him again the media would get it first, as they were in front of him, he said something like 'i don't mind that', i haven't heard it all or exactly what was said but again, he didn't call for the media to be shot, just another derangement crew twisting the words, no doubt will find the unedited clip on X later and post it.

 

So just Trump chatting as he does about current events...  🤷‍♂️

[0ffshore360]

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Trump was talking about the bullet proof glass he was standing behind and that if someone was going to try assassinate him again the media would get it first, as they were in front of him, he said something like 'i don't mind that', i haven't heard it all or exactly what was said but again, he didn't call for the media to be shot, just another derangement crew twisting the words, no doubt will find the unedited clip on X later and post it.

 

 

He unmistakenly said that if anyone wanted to shoot him from that direction  it would take down some media individual/s in the attempt and he would not mind (would  welcome) that!

[BangkokReady]

2 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

He unmistakenly said that if anyone wanted to shoot him from that direction  it would take down some media individual/s in the attempt and he would not mind (would  welcome) that!

 

So basically Trump being Trump and joking around.  You guys are pretty desperate for anything to pin on him.  🙄

[Gobbler]

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

A great number of reports are saying that Trump said he wants to put Liz Chaney in front of a firing squad.

This is an out and out lie.

 

He clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

 

I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without

distorting and lying about what he said.

Liz Cheney is dirt. Did you know that the Jan 6 committee has destroyed all evidence and that people are in prison based on that evidence?  Liz Cheney took part with Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff is scum too. 

 

 

[Keep Right]

They don't need to but they do. Most media is left wing and everyone knows it. The media does not even try to hide it now. But most patriot American see through these lies and want change and that is why the patriots will vote Trump.

[bunnydrops]

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

A great number of reports are saying that Trump said he wants to put Liz Chaney in front of a firing squad.

You should give a link for that as I haven't seen any mention of firing squad.

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

A great number of reports are saying that Trump said he wants to put Liz Chaney in front of a firing squad.

This is an out and out lie.

 

He clearly says "Let's put her with a rifle standing there..." with a number of rifles aimed at her.

Guess what?

People placed in front of a firing squad don't get their own rifle to fight back.

He was not talking about putting her in front of a firing squad.

 

I'm not defending Trump, I'm criticizing any number of people who are twisting what he said.

Trumpers can still go forth and multiply with themselves as far as I'm concerned, but there is plenty to criticize Trump about without

distorting and lying about what he said.

As cockeyed rationalizations go, yours is a doozy.

 

What chance do you think a single person armed with a rifle has against an firing squad, normally 5-12 people?

 

Trump will say anything that gets him the spotlight. The problem is, his brainwashed sheep accept what he says, and sometimes act on it.

 

Please do not suggest Trumpers go forth and multiply, they have dragged America's average IQ low enough already.

[Gobbler]

The so-called Media must be targeted after a Trump Win. They are the enemy of the people more than the cretins in the House or Senate.

[bubblegum]

37 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Trump was talking about the bullet proof glass he was standing behind and that if someone was going to try assassinate him again the media would get it first, as they were in front of him, he said something like 'i don't mind that', i haven't heard it all or exactly what was said but again, he didn't call for the media to be shot, just another derangement crew twisting the words, no doubt will find the unedited clip on X later and post it.

 

 

Every time you can't defend Trump you return to "I have not seen/heard/read it" Like Trump never heard of Epstein.

[bubblegum]

1 minute ago, Gobbler said:

The so-called Media must be targeted after a Trump Win. They are the enemy of the people more than the cretins in the House or Senate.

Normal people don't talk about the enemy of the people.

[Gobbler]

30 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Normal people don't talk about the enemy of the people.

The statement above makes no sense. 

 

Use the Justice Department to prove the media's complicity as traitors to the United States and the People. 

 

 

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, bubblegum said:

Every time you can't defend Trump you return to "I have not seen/heard/read it" Like Trump never heard of Epstein.

i don't sit listening to the news all day long, when i hear some crap posted here about Trump i try to find the original footage so i can see what actually happened or was said. too many times the msm been caught lying and the usual TD posse here repeating it. like the last 5 threads for example, but, but, Trump.

roll on tomorrow, i'm hoping things go catastrophically wrong for all the derangement crew here!

 

where has Trump ever said he hadn't heard of Epstein ? are you lying again?

[flexomike]

49 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said:

I have DIL in South Carolina that is both an Evangelical religious pawn and a devotee to Trump.

One of many Cultists !

and your point is?

[Gobbler]

The same fate should await all government workers and people representing us. Try them fairly. Prove they are traitors to the county. Give them their right to bring it back to court. When all is exhausted, follow our law.

 

I wouldn't mind bringing back the guillotine.