Jump to content

Malaysia's Kelantan State Plans 100km Wall on Thai Border


webfact

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, webfact said:

This ambitious project aims to address cross-border crimes, smuggling, and flooding issues.

Notice does not mention Malay Muslim insurgents who would be escaping Thailand. They do escape into the jungle areas bordering Thailand and Malaysia to avoid Thai military. But according to Malaysia (as I recall several years ago), many Malay Muslim insurgents receive dual Malaysian citizenship and can enter Malaysia legally. In the past Thai government has asked Malaysia for a list of such people but denied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JimHuaHin said:

Maybe Malaysia is afraid Thailand will attempt to reclaim "lost territory".

Northern states of Malaysia ( Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis ) were in the past vassal states of Siam ( now Thailand ). Thailand relinquished its claims to the northern states in the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909.

https://www.quora.com/Why-isn’t-Southern-Thailand-part-of-Malaysia-It-has-a-similar-ethnicity-culture-and-religion

Territory was not "lost" but willingly transferred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Srikcir said:

Northern states of Malaysia ( Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis ) were in the past vassal states of Siam ( now Thailand ). Thailand relinquished its claims to the northern states in the Anglo-Siamese Treaty of 1909.

https://www.quora.com/Why-isn’t-Southern-Thailand-part-of-Malaysia-It-has-a-similar-ethnicity-culture-and-religion

Territory was not "lost" but willingly transferred.

 

 

... Probably all would be better off if they would have transferred all the areas where Malays/Muslims were dominant. End result of not doing it along ethnic/religious lines are well visible thwree (as well as in many other places elsewhere too) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mran66 said:

 

 

... Probably all would be better off if they would have transferred all the areas where Malays/Muslims were dominant. End result of not doing it along ethnic/religious lines are well visible thwree (as well as in many other places elsewhere too) 

Oh I agree, including the Malay Muslim Kingdom of Patani. But superpower Great Britain in that time controlled annexations in SE Asia had other ideas about who got which of the small Muslim Kingdom's as it wanted trade noncompetitive trade agreements with all the small Muslim Kingdom's.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mran66 said:

 

 

... Probably all would be better off if they would have transferred all the areas where Malays/Muslims were dominant. End result of not doing it along ethnic/religious lines are well visible thwree (as well as in many other places elsewhere too) 

 

Except all the oil and gas is down there, and they would lose all rights to it to Malaysia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...