Arrest of Suspected Serial Killer in France Sparks Outrage Over Immigration Policies

[Social Media]

 

French authorities have apprehended a suspected serial killer at a train station in Toulon, following an attempted assault on a woman aboard a train. The man’s description closely aligns with that of the primary suspect in the recent killing of a homeless man in Lyon, who was murdered after being struck by bricks thrown at his head. Toulon police identified the man by his striking resemblance to the Lyon attacker, right down to the orange shoelaces he was seen wearing. Images of the alleged Lyon assailant, captured by surveillance cameras, had circulated widely on social media since early in the week, helping the public and authorities in their search.

 

 

The individual in custody is also believed to be linked to a disturbing series of attempted murders spanning multiple locations, including Évry, Strasbourg, and Dijon in France, as well as Rotterdam in the Netherlands, where another homeless man was attacked with a concrete slab. While questioned by police, the suspect reportedly identified himself as a 37-year-old national of Cameroon. Despite having no prior criminal record, he was under a deportation order due to his undocumented status in France.

 

This arrest has ignited a fierce debate across the country regarding France’s immigration policies and the enforcement of deportation orders, known as "Obligations de Quitter le Territoire Français" (OQTF). Commenting on the situation, politician Marion Maréchal voiced her frustration on social media, writing, “The French are discovering with horror that the serial killer of homeless people, accused of 5 murders, is in fact an illegal Cameroonian under OQTF and that he was able to enter, leave and return freely to France without the slightest border control. Our lax migratory approach is criminal.”

 

The case has led to comparisons with other recent tragedies involving individuals who, despite having deportation orders, remained in the country. Many see these crimes as avoidable and view this situation as evidence of flaws in the current immigration system.

 

Based on a report by European Conservative | X 2024-11-16

 

 

 

[Anant72]

Macronian France is totally constrained by the yoke of the EU and has hardly a say in matters pertaining to its national interest. Brussels orders, Paris bends the knee. Empress Van der Leyen is in charge. Add to that the enormous power wielded by leftist judges who are a majority in the judiciary and  whose judgment are colored by their ieftist ideology: pro-immigration, against deportation and extremely lax when they deal with foreign criminals. All this with the blessing of an aloof, passive, weak, who is in fact a coward.

[AndreasHG]

25 minutes ago, Anant72 said:

Macronian France is totally constrained by the yoke of the EU

 

BS: The administrative order (the so called "Obligations de Quitter le Territoire Français") issued by a prefect to leave France is, under French law, is not enforceable under most circumstances, and gives the illegal immigrant 30 days to voluntarily leave the country by his/her own means (https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F18362?lang=en).

 

What has to do a French law with the EU is a total mystery to me. And we have seen the benefits of getting rid of the yoke of the EU in Britain: after Brexit net immigration skyrocketed. 

 

The EU is the excuse that inept and corrupt local politicians use to hide their guilt and confuse idiots. But we are intelligent and understand their game perfectly.

 

[goldenbrwn1]

He should of bought a dinghy, he’d of been more than welcome into the UK by the useful idiots

[The Old Bull]

When someone is ordered deported they should be taken directly to the airport not even stopping at the 7/11 for a toothbrush. If they want to appeal they can do it from outside the country. The problem is there would be no money in that for the lawyers who made up the laws.

[john donson]

why EU cannot setup a post/prison/detention center in AFRICA... detain the illegal, bring him to airport prison cell and deport, and if they resist, transport in a dog style cage in cargo

[Kinok Farang]

When the time comes (if we are not too late already) when this stupidity ends,there needs to be accountability for the wanton destruction of Europe.

Only the brave few politicians speak out against this crime and are immediately shouted down by cowardly politicians and bat-shiit crazy lefties who are too blind to see the impending death of Europe.What they don't realise is if the Islamists (god forbid) ever take power it is the lefty commies,transpeople and homos that they will come for first.

 

[mokwit]

Rub the politicians noses in the consequences of their actions.

[mokwit]

20 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

When the time comes (if we are not too late already) when this stupidity ends,there needs to be accountability for the wanton destruction of Europe.

Only the brave few politicians speak out against this crime and are immediately shouted down by cowardly politicians and bat-shiit crazy lefties who are too blind to see the impending death of Europe.What they don't realise is if the Islamists (god forbid) ever take power it is the lefty commies,transpeople and homos that they will come for first.

 

Absolutely, those responsible for this need to be held to account. You cannot cause the damage they have and just retire into the sunset.

[stevenl]

On 11/16/2024 at 2:02 PM, Anant72 said:

Macronian France is totally constrained by the yoke of the EU and has hardly a say in matters pertaining to its national interest. Brussels orders, Paris bends the knee. Empress Van der Leyen is in charge. Add to that the enormous power wielded by leftist judges who are a majority in the judiciary and  whose judgment are colored by their ieftist ideology: pro-immigration, against deportation and extremely lax when they deal with foreign criminals. All this with the blessing of an aloof, passive, weak, who is in fact a coward.

Ignoring your personal attacks, from start to finish nonsense.

11 hours ago, The Old Bull said:

When someone is ordered deported they should be taken directly to the airport not even stopping at the 7/11 for a toothbrush. If they want to appeal they can do it from outside the country. The problem is there would be no money in that for the lawyers who made up the laws.

Yes, agree with that.

[stevenl]

23 hours ago, AndreasHG said:

 

BS: The administrative order (the so called "Obligations de Quitter le Territoire Français") issued by a prefect to leave France is, under French law, is not enforceable under most circumstances, and gives the illegal immigrant 30 days to voluntarily leave the country by his/her own means (https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/vosdroits/F18362?lang=en).

 

What has to do a French law with the EU is a total mystery to me. And we have seen the benefits of getting rid of the yoke of the EU in Britain: after Brexit net immigration skyrocketed. 

 

The EU is the excuse that inept and corrupt local politicians use to hide their guilt and confuse idiots. But we are intelligent and understand their game perfectly.

 

Agreed, except for the 'joke of the EU. I still find it a pity for both parties they left. But yes, it does show blaming me EU is incorrect.

[JonnyF]

18 hours ago, mokwit said:

Rub the politicians noses in the consequences of their actions.

 

They are safe in their ivory towers, leafy suburbs, private jets etc.

 

It's the poor people that suffer from these "cultural enrichers". In this case, the homeless being brutally smashed to death.

 

 

[RayC]

On 11/17/2024 at 10:24 AM, john donson said:

why EU cannot setup a post/prison/detention center in AFRICA...

 

Firstly, the EU does not have any legal jurisdiction in Africa (apart a couple of enclaves which Spain still has in what is Morocco) so there are practical problems ....

 

On 11/17/2024 at 10:24 AM, john donson said:

 

detain the illegal, bring him to airport prison cell and deport, and if they resist, transport in a dog style cage in cargo

 

... secondly, there is something which can be called 'basic humanity'. Most of us find the idea of transporting dogs in cages distasteful - unless it is absolutely necessary - let alone humans.

[JonnyF]

23 hours ago, RayC said:

secondly, there is something which can be called 'basic humanity'. Most of us find the idea of transporting dogs in cages distasteful - unless it is absolutely necessary - let alone humans.

 

Criminals are frequently kept in cages. Sometimes they are referred to as jail/police cells. If they don't like it, they can always stop breaking the law by illegally entering countries to which they have no right to enter.  

[pattayasan]

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Criminals are frequently kept in cages. Sometimes they are referred to as jail/police cells. If they don't like it, they can always stop breaking the law by illegally entering countries to which they have no right to enter.  

 

The worst criminals are the babies. So heinous are their crimes that they had to be separated from their mothers.

[JonnyF]

5 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

The worst criminals are the babies. So heinous are their crimes that they had to be separated from their mothers.

 

The same often happens to young children of adults who go to jail. Would you suggest that parents are excluded from the prison system? Or would you prefer the children go to jail with them?

 

Here's a radical idea, if you have a young child, don't engage in calculated criminal activity. Just a free parenting tip.  

[pattayasan]

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

The same often happens to young children of adults who go to jail. Would you suggest that parents are excluded from the prison system? Or would you prefer the children go to jail with them?

 

Here's a radical idea, if you have a young child, don't engage in calculated criminal activity. Just a free parenting tip.  

 

Their parents did not commit a crime involving sufficient incarceration to justify removing their children, often NEVER to be seen again by their parent. A crime against humanity. Almost 1,000 children. Animals.

Edited 2 hours ago by pattayasan

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

Their parents did not commit a crime involving sufficient incarceration to justify removing their children, often NEVER to be seen again by their parent. A crime against humanity. .

 

Of course they deserved incarceration. Try breaking illegally into Thailand and see where you end up. The IDC, that's where.

 

If they have children there are 2 choices, separate the children or send them to the IDC as well. Neither are good options, but the fault is with the parents wilfully breaking the law, not the country enforcing it's laws against these criminals. 

[pattayasan]

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Of course they deserved incarceration. Try breaking illegally into Thailand and see where you end up. The IDC, that's where.

 

If they have children there are 2 choices, separate the children or send them to the IDC as well. Neither are good options, but the fault is with the parents wilfully breaking the law, not the country enforcing it's laws against these criminals. 

 

Did 1,000 children deserve never to meet their mothers again?

 

 

Edited 2 hours ago by pattayasan

[JonnyF]

6 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Did 1,000 children deserve never to meet their mothers again?

 

 

 

I feel sorry for the children of all criminal parents that get incarcerated.

 

It's not their fault. It's the parents. 

 

Unfortunately for the criminals, procreation is not a licence to commit crime.  

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, JonnyF said:

 

I feel sorry for the children of all criminal parents that get incarcerated.

 

It's not their fault. It's the parents. 

 

Unfortunately for the criminals, procreation is not a licence to commit crime.  

 

But it wasn't Trump's fault, right?

[JonnyF]

1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

But it wasn't Trump's fault, right?

 

A strange deflection but correct nonetheless, it certainly wasn't Trump's fault that they illegal entered a country with their children in tow. 

[pattayasan]

46 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

A strange deflection but correct nonetheless, it certainly wasn't Trump's fault that they illegal entered a country with their children in tow. 

 

I mean it wasn't Trump's fault that the children were removed from their mothers? Your lot will do anything to avoid owning your mess.

[JonnyF]

10 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I mean it wasn't Trump's fault that the children were removed from their mothers? Your lot will do anything to avoid owning your mess.

 

Are you posting on the wrong thread?

 

This one is about France.