Women’s Privacy vs. Inclusion: One Woman’s Stand Against Gender-Neutral Toilets

[Social Media]

 

Sarah Holman’s journey from a dedicated council employee to a passionate advocate for women’s rights highlights the complex interplay of inclusion policies and personal safety concerns. The 56-year-old, a mother of two, had long enjoyed her role at Bracknell Forest Council in Berkshire, regenerating land for housing. Yet, her principles and past experiences drove her to make a difficult decision: resigning after 12 years of service due to the council’s shift to gender-neutral toilet policies.  

 

 

For Sarah, the policy change resurfaced a buried trauma. More than three decades earlier, while on holiday abroad, she had been sexually assaulted in a unisex restroom. “I’d walked into the cubicle, and a man followed me, blocking the doorway and gesturing that he wanted sex,” she recalls. “He lunged at me, putting his hands on me. I was too startled to fight back.” The assault ended only when another man passed by, but the memory lay dormant until the council’s decision triggered a visceral response.  

 

“I saw the sign on the door, and memories came flooding back,” Sarah shares. “I had an anxiety attack—palpitations, a racing heart. It was the first time I’d felt unsafe at work.”  

 

Her concerns deepened when the council adopted a “Trans and Non-Binary Policy” that effectively removed all single-sex toilets in the office. While Sarah supports equality, she believes the move neglected women’s rights. “All a male has to do is say, ‘I’m going through gender reassignment,’ and they can access women’s toilets. That’s really insulting to women.”  

 

Sarah’s personal experiences added weight to her objections. In 2000, she suffered a miscarriage at work. Reflecting on that harrowing ordeal, she says, “I was in a toilet cubicle, crying and in pain. I can’t imagine how much worse it would’ve been in a shared space with men. Women need privacy for moments like this.”  

 

Despite raising her concerns, Sarah found little support. “The council said sharing toilets with males was no different than sharing a lift. If staff objected, they’d be referred to counseling. It felt dismissive.” When the council formalized its policies in mid-2023, Sarah felt compelled to resign.  

 

The council’s use of the Progress Pride flag also troubled Sarah. She saw its prominence—as screensavers, meeting backdrops, and outside the building—as disproportionate. “It felt like virtue signaling, prioritizing trans rights over women’s,” she explains. Her suggestion to include other flags, like one for menopause awareness, was met with indifference.  

 

Sarah’s departure has not been the end of her fight. She is taking the council to an employment tribunal, alleging discrimination for her gender-critical views. “Councils across the country are gaslighting women, brushing aside our concerns in favor of ideological policies. This has to stop.”  

 

Bracknell Forest Council defends its stance, with Chief Executive Susan Halliwell stating that the policies aim to promote equality and diversity. The council maintains that it offers both single-sex and gender-neutral facilities. Yet for Sarah, this is inadequate. “In their efforts to be inclusive, they’re excluding women. Women’s dignity, privacy, and safety are being compromised.”  

 

Her decision to step away from a job she loved was not easy, but Sarah stands firm in her belief that women’s voices deserve to be heard. “I’m not a radical feminist, just an ordinary woman standing up for what’s right.”  

 

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-30

 

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

Good for her. The creeping takeover of public institutions by the loonies will not stop till the public become aware of what is happening.

[Yagoda]

Homosexuality and transgenderism are mental illnesses and we should pity and help the sufferers. Helping them does not mean indulging them with the fantasies that control their lives, but rather, respectfully trying to steer them to reality.