Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, candide said:

In particular the standard of living in a country.

I not agree wiith it. The standard of living in a country relevant to GDP (ppp) per capita as in your link. In that term you are right, the standard of living in Russia is pretty low.

However GDP by PPP represents whole economy more precisely than nominal GDP

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, VBer said:

I not agree wiith it. The standard of living in a country relevant to GDP (ppp) per capita as in your link. In that term you are right, the standard of living in Russia is pretty low.

However GDP by PPP represents whole economy more precisely than nominal GDP

I asked Copilot (ChatGPT), in order to get an external assessment. Here's the reply:

 

### Nominal GDP:
- **Definition**: Measured at current market exchange rates, reflecting the value of goods and services in terms of the local currency converted to a common currency (usually USD).
- **Best for**: Comparing the size and strength of economies in the global market. It’s particularly relevant for evaluating countries' influence in global trade, investment, and financial markets.
- **Weakness**: It does not account for differences in cost of living across countries, which may distort the real value of economic output.

### GDP (PPP):
- **Definition**: Adjusts for differences in price levels between countries, essentially reflecting the purchasing power of each country's currency within its borders.
- **Best for**: Comparing living standards and the real value of economic output. It’s useful when you want to assess how much a given amount of income can buy in terms of goods and services within each country.
- **Weakness**: It may not accurately reflect a country’s ability to engage in international trade or its influence in global markets.

### Example of Use:
- If you're analyzing economic dominance, trade relationships, or global influence, **nominal GDP** is usually the preferred metric.
- If you're comparing living standards, economic productivity, or income distribution, **GDP (PPP)** is more appropriate.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, candide said:

### GDP (PPP)
- **Best for**: Comparing living standards and the real value of economic output. It’s useful when you want to assess how much a given amount of income can buy in terms of goods and services within each country.

So, ChatGPT says that Russia is number 4 of in  the World in terms of livings standards? 😀

I quite disagree with it.

if one country produces 1 ton of aluminium with the price of $500 and another country produces 1 ton of aluminium with the price of $1000 for me these are the same economies.

However if count by nominal GDP economy of second country will be measured as two times bigger.

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, VBer said:

So, ChatGPT says that Russia is number 4 of in  the World in terms of livings standards? 😀

I quite disagree with it.

if one country produces 1 ton of aluminium with the price of $500 and another country produces 1 ton of aluminium with the price of $1000 for me these are the same economies.

However if count by nominal GDP economy of second country will be measured as two times bigger.

 

 

"So, ChatGPT says that Russia is number 4 of in  the World in terms of livings standards? 😀"

 

Where is it written in my post?

  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, candide said:

Where is it written in my post?

### GDP (PPP)
- **Best for**: Comparing living standards”

Posted
36 minutes ago, VBer said:

### GDP (PPP)
- **Best for**: Comparing living standards”

That's the summary made by chatGPT. With what do you disagree?

- If you're analyzing economic dominance, trade relationships, or global influence, **nominal GDP** is usually the preferred metric.
- If you're comparing living standards, economic productivity, or income distribution, **GDP (PPP)** is more appropriate.

Posted
On 3/26/2025 at 5:50 AM, TedG said:

Here is a list of Western companies still doing business with Russia. 

 

https://leave-russia.org/staying-companies?flt[147][eq][]=9057

 

I don't know why the Western governments allow this to happen.

The entire industrialization of Russia in the Stalin era was made by American specialists. Sanctions were far more strict during those times. Seems like there are no walls that can stop business on its way to huge profits.

Posted
1 hour ago, candide said:

With what do you disagree?

I disagree that GDP by PPP represents living standards

Quality of life is affected by GDP by PPP per capita, not by GDP per PPP.

 

GDP by PPP represents the total strength of economy measured in goods sold and services provided. In this term Russia is #4 is the world, went up from #6 in last some years. 

 

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 2
Posted
22 hours ago, stevenl said:

I was hoping you would explain so you might see yourself how nonsensical your argument?/post was. Unless you think that when posters see a doomed economy it will implode within a few months.

 

Didn't seem particulary insane to me. I've been on worse exercises than that.

 

As for the numptie showing a white light on his face at minute 15, what the **** was he thinking. Waste of time driving without lights if the passenger is lit up like a street lamp.

I wasn't making an argument, as I stated the fact that the thread started in November- are you going to say it wasn't?

 

As for Give it some time. on that basis so is America's economy with it's multi trillion $ debt.

 

Russia is doing just fine when some on here claim it's in imminent danger of collapsing :whistling:

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
20 hours ago, VBer said:

I not agree wiith it. The standard of living in a country relevant to GDP (ppp) per capita as in your link. In that term you are right, the standard of living in Russia is pretty low.

However GDP by PPP represents whole economy more precisely than nominal GDP

Wittering about GDP etc is a waste of time as it says nothing about "standard of living" as reality for real people. Just spending more does not make people better off. Bhutan is the only country in the world with a sane SOL index as it measure people's happiness, not their money in the bank.

 

I doubt there is any western country where a majority of the people are happy.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
2 minutes ago, MicroB said:

due to lack of bearings:

 

You think that a country with its own space program,nuclear power and weapons  can't produce its own bearings ???   come on !!

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, MicroB said:

as the Soviet Union, with A-Bombs, men in space, could make bearings, but they never were able to make the grade of bearings for rail stock, and the main supplier always used to be Finland. Glasnost enabled access to Western Know-how. But Know-How goes once the Western engineers go home.

Yeah I still say rubbish,  the equipment and the know how is still very much there  once the Western engineers go home, not that is really "rocket science" in the first place..and if  (big if)  the Russians can't make the bearings then of course their close neighbour and friendly country China would oblige.

 

As a side note  I made bearing journals for British Timken at a factory in Potters Bar.

 

13 minutes ago, MicroB said:

During the Cold War, Russia couldn't produce the computers necessary of CAD of submarine propellors. So it smuggled Toshiba units, Remember that?

No don't remember that    I do remember the Americans spending millions producing a pen to write in space  and the Russians just used a pencil.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

deleted because I don't care about the defenders of barabarism

Well  ok up to you 👌.

Don't know who's defending barbarism certainly not me.

  • Confused 1
Posted
14 hours ago, MicroB said:

 

Same country had to turn to a third world nation for drones that it couldn't design. same country couldn't produce shells, so i9t turn ed to 70 year old North Koerean supplies.

 

During the Cold War, Russia couldn't produce the computers necessary of CAD of submarine propellors. So it smuggled Toshiba units, Remember that?

 

Russia expends considerable effort, and probably paying over the odds, to smuggle in European and Japanese bearings. It wouldn't do so if it could make them.

 

https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/russia-defies-sanctions-continues-to-secure-critical-bearings-including-from-eu-manufacturers-5104

 

Russian Rail is dependant on 3 suppliers for rail wagon cassette bearings: wedish SKF,Timken and Amsted Rail. These 3 firms had established assembly plants in Russia, importing components, with final assembly to Russian specs in Mother Russia. They all left.

 

The Russians have claimed to have adapted, through local manufacture by EPK-Brenko and TEK-KOM. These bearings have about 5 years service life, and the last Western ones were fitted in 2022. The rail system has seen increased uptick is usage by heavy cargo, given the tank refurbishment factories are out in the far east, and all of the Korean munitons are coming in by rail. The frequency of derailments increased first in the fair east, then Caucasus, and now now hitting the Mosco region, indicating indigenous attempts to plug the bearings supply has failed; Russia, as the Soviet Union, with A-Bombs, men in space, could make bearings, but they never were able to make the grade of bearings for rail stock, and the main supplier always used to be Finland. Glasnost enabled access to Western Know-how. But Know-How goes once the Western engineers go home.

I'll add that to the list of posts over the past couple years claiming that Russia had no tanks, no missiles, no troops, no oil, no money, no drones, no bullets etc etc etc.

 

Ever hear the story of the boy that called wolf?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, rabas said:

 

Anyone who discusses this war while overlooking Putin's horrifically barbaric targeting and killing of innocent civilians, families, children, cruise missile a children's cancer hospital?  is certainly defending barbarism. 

 

Anything to say about a different war with similar? I expect you don't.

  • Confused 4
Posted
14 hours ago, johng said:

No don't remember that    I do remember the Americans spending millions producing a pen to write in space  and the Russians just used a pencil.

Good one!

How many thousands do you think the Russians spend for a military plane toilet seat?

 

https://www.military.com/defensetech/2018/07/11/air-force-no-longer-spending-10000-toilet-seats-officials-say.html

Air Force No Longer Spending $10,000 on Toilet Seats, Officials Say

  • Confused 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, johng said:

 

 

No don't remember that    I do remember the Americans spending millions producing a pen to write in space  and the Russians just used a pencil.

 

I do remember this:

 

 

 

Screenshot 2025-04-08 at 6.44.32 PM.png

  • Thanks 1
Posted
23 hours ago, rabas said:

Do you really want to use a graphite pencil in space inhaling graphite dust or worse a broken pencil tip that could damage your lungs?

LOL. Soooo tell us how many Russians were disabled from inhaling graphite dust or worse a pencil tip.

 

Next.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
23 hours ago, rabas said:

famous but false narrative. I know because I was there.

Well please do tell us all about your space adventures and the troublsome graphite dust.. 😋

Couldn't they just sharpen the pencil inside a paper bag ?  another option would be a crayon 🖍️

Anyway my point was that the Russians solved the problem with a quick readily available cheap solution while the Americans set about reinventing the wheel (pen)

  • Confused 3
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...