Jump to content

Rising Alarm: CDC Monitors Mystery Flu-Like Illness Killing Dozens in Africa


Recommended Posts

Posted

They don’t know what it is and they are already trying to scare the public. Hopefully it’s identified soon and they can get it under control. I don’t think the general public is going to worry much about it right now. Considering how the Covid virus was handled I don’t have much faith in the government or so called vaccines. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Monkey pox got no traction, nor did its rebrand "MPox"..... before that it was tomato virus or some such, but that b0mbed, too.

 

DISEASE X .......... from the Congo ...........    a much more menacing and sinister ring to it.  Could gain much needed traction for W-H-O and the vaxxx enterprises.

 

No worries here mate. I've got stock in all the major vaxxxx mixologists...

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

Is this the "bleeding eyes" disease?.....high fatality rate without prompt treatment.....a virus similar to Ebola.

 

Well let's hope some busybody of a do-gooder doesn't come up with a vaccine to protect us all.

 

   You had the Covid injection and you are considering going back to the UK because of health reasons , I didn't have a the Covid Jab and I am staying in Thailand 

  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   You had the Covid injection and you are considering going back to the UK because of health reasons , I didn't have a the Covid Jab and I am staying in Thailand 

 

......and?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, jcmj said:

They don’t know what it is and they are already trying to scare the public. Hopefully it’s identified soon and they can get it under control. I don’t think the general public is going to worry much about it right now. Considering how the Covid virus was handled I don’t have much faith in the government or so called vaccines. 

Huh? The one thing they didn’t do with covid is to inform the public early enough! What you think is “scaring the public” is informing them in time of what’s going on. So now you can take your own precautionary measures. 

  • Like 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, pacovl46 said:

Huh? The one thing they didn’t do with covid is to inform the public early enough! What you think is “scaring the public” is informing them in time of what’s going on. So now you can take your own precautionary measures. 

So you already have a vaccine for it. If you don't Fauci will have one tomorrow.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

The W.H.O. are just looking for an opportunity to flex their political muscle and call for lockdowns and mask mandates.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
On 12/7/2024 at 8:26 AM, Will B Good said:

Is this the "bleeding eyes" disease?.....high fatality rate without prompt treatment.....a virus similar to Ebola.

 

Well let's hope some busybody of a do-gooder doesn't come up with a vaccine to protect us all.

 

Years ago, in my professional capacity, I was interviewed by the National Geographic, as they investigated a particular death in Sierra Leone, in the midst of the Ebola epidemic (technically a Pandemic, as it after 3-4 countries in Africa, with cases in Spain and the UK). I have spent many years in CBRN and infectious disease diagnostics.

 

The Ebola virus is one of a number of filoviruses. Tne main symptoms are a flu-like malaise. It causes a hemorrhagic fever, which means it interferes with the clotting action, and internal bleeding as capillaries spring leaks. In the early stages, it is treatable. The symptoms you describe are largely a Hollywood invention. In most cases, the victims pass away in their own <deleted> and piss.

 

One of the issues of the epidemic of 10+ years ago was a lack of diagnostic capacity in the region. Liberia was a complete basket case. Sierra Leone had a reasonable reference lab in the capital, but beyond that, very little.

 

The WHO operated a number of essentially jungle labs; people setting themselves up in sheds, warehouses, with some portable thermocyclers, inflatable glove boxes, but the testing volume was very very limited. 10 years ago, there were no commericially available tests for the Ebola virus.

 

So foreign nations sent specialists in to help. Ebola being Ebola meant that experience was basically military. The UK sent in teams of Royal Engineers to build field hospitals in Sierra leone, but we offered no extra testing capacity to that nation, instead setting up a floating hospital offshore to support UK personnel. The South African Defence Force sent a mobile lab to Sierra Leone, and did a 3 month rotation, whuch was handy as I was able to speak to some of their team about what was going on. The Chinese also sent a mobile military lab to the country, with much fanfare. In Guinea, the EU was represented by French Army and Bundeswehr units, but I believe the Russian Army got people in country.

 

In Liberia, USMC deployed to an abandoned crop research station.  Basically how any of these militaries did the testing was a bit of a secret, but it doesn't take much to suppose what it was. USMC, at the time, had JBAIDS, a portable PCR system, which included Ebola targets. They also got hold of standard commercial thermocyclers, and ported over the Edgewood assays to those. Interestingly, because American civilians  were there, and the history of Liberia, the JBAIDS Ebola assay needed FDA emergency authorisation. That meant they had to publish the test data, including simulant and live agent testing.

 

Because of the completely broken down road network in Liberia, the Marine base needed to be supported by air. Which meant the fuel for the generators had to be airlifted in, every day. This fuel powered the offices, the canteens, the airconditioning, and the labs. At the time, all the reagents  used needed -20 freezing storage. As it was, the might of the US could only manage about 100-150 Ebola tests a day, limited by the amount of storage space they had for reagents. The capacity of the other labs was no better (the South Africans kept really good diaries, and they worked like dogs to test).

 

While about 30,000 cases were detected, with about 50% of them dying, in reality, 70% of Ebola infections were not picked up by the labs. Given the expected positivity test rate, there simply wasn't enough testing capacity in the region.

 

I see they've had a bit of a Marburg outbreak in Uganda. Marburg is named after the German University where German scientists, in the 1970s, discovered the virus, and subsequently died (Soviet agents exhumed some of the bodies to obtain tissue samples, which provided enough material to eaponise Marburg virus). In 2 years, the 2014 ebola outbreak killed about 15,000 people, so about 150 people a week on average.

 

In a few weeks, the mystery infection has killed 135, and 416 cases. A traveller arriving in Italy has been attributed ti having "Congo Disease".  Based on symptoms presenting, ( fever, headache, cough, respiratory difficulties, anemia), the working hypothesis is Mycoplasma pneumoniae, a bacaterium. Some think this is a bit of a stretch, because the mortality rate is too high for this bug.

 

Whats key is this outbreak is occurring in Panzi, which is very remote. That means deploying the needed specialists is difficult. It also limits the potential for transmission, though with at least one case already in Europe, one has to be vigilant.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...