Jump to content

Was Ex police officer Derek Chauvin wrongly convicted !


Recommended Posts

Posted

The official autopsy conducted by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner did not mention a tumor such as paraganglioma as a contributing factor in George Floyd’s death. 

 

https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/public-safety/medical-examiner/floyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf

 

If the basis for a retrial or evidential hearing is a rare tumour in the neck caused death.....the pathologist is out of a job.

  • Agree 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I remember that,How pathetic, talk about pandering for votes. I can't believe any one wouldn't see that for what it is.

 

Activists ! Social justice  warriors!

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Floyd's behavior is irrelevant, his crime, if any, was trivial.

The police don't have the right to kill unarmed suspects.

Your talking about Ashli Babbitt , who was unarmed and shot to death, right?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

I do not believe so. 1) He had his knee on Floyd's neck for nine minutes. 2) He had three backup officers. Floyd was phsycially bigger than Chauvin and if he did not have backup then the circumstances could have been different.  But what do I know becasue I was a street cop in LA for only 20 years. Ironically Chauvin had 19 years on the job and was the senior officer on the call with Floyd. I can tell the less experienced offciers were hesitant to tell Chauvin to back off and see if Floyd complies.  Chauvin will be eligible for parole in 2038. He be almost 60 years old 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Gotta remember also, Floyd was one big strong SOB.  He dwarfed all the cops on scene. That, plus his obvious intoxication, made them excessively paranoid.  To me, it looked almost like Chauvin blanked out, like he didn't know what to do after they finally got Floyd in handcuffs and on the ground.  They had tried to load him into a police SUV, but Floyd claimed to be claustrophobic and resisted- strange since Floyd had arrived on the scene in a car. Obviously a BS excuse to avoid being booked or searched.  

 

I always thought a negligent death charge or the like would have been justified, but not murder.  

You may be right. I have seen experienced officers "zone" or check out on several high stress calls. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, riclag said:

“Judge rules past arrests, bodycam footage of George Floyd inadmissible at trial

In a 2019 arrest, Floyd allegedly swallowed controlled substances and engaged in 'diversionary behavior'.

 

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) generally prohibits introducing evidence of prior crimes to show that a person has a “bad character” or is likely to commit the crime they are accused of. However, prior offences may be introduced for other purposes, such as proving intent, motive, knowledge, or opportunity.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

I do not believe so. 1) He had his knee on Floyd's neck for nine minutes. 2) He had three backup officers. Floyd was phsycially bigger than Chauvin and if he did not have backup then the circumstances could have been different.  But what do I know becasue I was a street cop in LA for only 20 years. Ironically Chauvin had 19 years on the job and was the senior officer on the call with Floyd. I can tell the less experienced offciers were hesitant to tell Chauvin to back off and see if Floyd complies.  Chauvin will be eligible for parole in 2038. He be almost 60 years old 

 

ONLY......wow...hat off to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...