Jump to content

Was Ex police officer Derek Chauvin wrongly convicted !


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Guess you didn't see the body cam footage from when Flloyd was in the cop car

 

What does that have to do with kneeling on someone's neck, who wasn't resisting, for an extended amount of time? Do we kill petty criminals now?

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

You may be right. I have seen experienced officers "zone" or check out on several high stress calls. 

I saw similar in the military. It is kind of an "adrenaline dump", where in the aftermath of a hugely stressful event people almost go catatonic.  Takes time for the system to "reset" into normal mode and allow for a return to normalcy.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

ONLY......wow...hat off to you.

To some my thoughts on this issue are not relevant. Others automatically assuemd I am going to defend or support Chauvin.  I have encountered some like Chauvin. Any police department in a medium or large sized city have guys like Chauvin.  In police work seniority carries a lot of weight. But in the end if a fellow officer is wrong and not safe one has to act or at the least say something out loud. 

  • Love It 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

To some my thoughts on this issue are not relevant. Others automatically assuemd I am going to defend or support Chauvin.  I have encountered some like Chauvin. Any police department in a medium or large sized city have guys like Chauvin.  In police work seniority carries a lot of weight. But in the end if a fellow officer is wrong and not safe one has to act or at the least say something out loud. 

 

Well said....and thank you for your service.

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Because it shows Flloyd claiming he couldn't breathe for over 8 minutes before he was put on the floor, so that would indicate he had a breathing issue before being restrained by Chauvin. Which backs up the possibility he had swallowed something .

Is there any eveidence to shown how much pressure Chauvin applied?

 

Why was he being restrained for nine minutes by having his neck knelt on, if he told the officer that he couldn't breathe? Seventeen minutes of being unable to breathe....

Petty criminals don't matter?

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) generally prohibits introducing evidence of prior crimes to show that a person has a “bad character” or is likely to commit the crime they are accused of. However, prior offences may be introduced for other purposes, such as proving intent, motive, knowledge, or opportunity.

And body cam footage?

  • Love It 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Where do you draw the line at, is tryng to pass counterfeit money 'trivial'?

 

I certainly wouldn't want to be asphyxiated if I were caught with a nine bob note.

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Will B Good said:

 

 

"Because it shows Flloyd claiming he couldn't breathe for over 8 minutes before he was put on the floor, that would indicate he had a breathing issue before being restrained by Chauvin".

 

Could that not suggest kneeling on his neck was not the best course of action?

Do you know how much pressure was applied? On the video He was saying 'I can't breath' quite clearly, his voice didn't sound effected or restricted as you would imagine it to be if someone was kneeling on you

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

And body cam footage?

That was fully admissible.....Riclag (intentionally?) produced that headline giving the idea the footage was inadmissible.....but that was from a previous arrest and comes under the same federal law.

Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Do you know how much pressure was applied? On the video He was saying 'I can't breath' quite clearly, his voice didn't sound effected or restricted as you would imagine it to be if someone was kneeling on you

No.

Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Do you know how much pressure was applied? On the video He was saying 'I can't breath' quite clearly, his voice didn't sound effected or restricted as you would imagine it to be if someone was kneeling on you

 

Why was he kneeling on him?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, AlwaysThere said:

 

Overzealous or cruel and 'unusual' behaviour? This time he got caught. Likely wasn't his first time.

Not sure what you mean here? If a criminal's past offenses are not allowed why should Chauvin's? Again am not excusing Chauvins actions, I am saying the sentence is over the top. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, riclag said:

I just saw a comment on X  that referenced Derek Chauvin  & George Floyd !

Many seem to think he was innocent!

 

Many racists about.

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AlwaysThere said:

 

Why was he kneeling on him?

He was restraining him, from what I gathered at the time, it is an allowed method. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, riclag said:

I just saw a comment on X  that referenced Derek Chauvin  & George Floyd !

Many seem to think he was innocent!

 

OMG....so you thought this through and still decided to post that statement.....555?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

He was restraining him, from what I gathered at the time, it is an allowed method. 

 

 

"From what I gathered".....I thought every frame of every video was imprinted on your memory.....or was just the audio?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

He was restraining him, from what I gathered at the time, it is an allowed method. 

 

Wrong. He didn't follow his own basic training.

 

Quote

The department policy, in place for at least eight years at the time, divided permissible neck restraints into two categories, according to court filings and testimony Monday by the city police chief, Medaria Arradondo. Neck restraints were defined in the policy as a “non-deadly force option.”

One, called a “conscious neck restraint,” was for light pressure applied to the neck to help control a person without rendering unconsciousness. It was permitted for a person actively resisting.

The other was an “unconscious neck restraint,” in which officers could use their arms or legs to knock out a person by pressing carotid arteries on either side of the neck, blocking blood flow to the brain. The policy called for it to be used only for a person “exhibiting active aggression” or actively resisting when lesser attempts to control the person had failed or were likely to fail.

Police guidelines also instructed officers, at the first possible opportunity, to turn people on their sides once they were handcuffed and under control to avoid “positional asphyxia,” in which breathing becomes labored in a prone position and can lead to death. The city had pledged to emphasize to officers the dangers of positional asphyxia as part of a $3 million settlement in the 2010 death of David Smith. Minneapolis officers subdued Smith with a Taser and pinned him face down on the floor for several minutes with their knees on his back.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Many racists about.

No ,racists is a extreme leftist narrative!

Floyd was a experienced Drug addict , criminal who worked the system to his advantage.

Watch the other side of the story that MSM refuses to acknowledge!

 

 

The Fall of Minneapolis  

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...