No, I'm talking about a working model of a globe around which water is uniformly held to the surface.
If no such model exists, then it is de facto a theory.
And I think it is pretty fitting to say it is a theory that holds no water.
You spoke to the wrong guy there, Skeptic is on your side
I respecfully recommend not getting too uptight, we are just a bunch of guys having a discussion, it's cool. And I am open to real counterpoints and solid arguments, out of principle I will always admit if I am proven wrong.
"Belief, not fact": that's a bit rich coming from a heliocentrism proponent, even Copernicus doubted his theory.
Yeah, didn't want to give that impression. I'm all for hookers in the right place. Just in the past I think I get ID'd as a businessman and get unwanted attention when I just want to chill out.
Prostitution in Taiwan? Sorry, have to disagree with you there based on my experience. I never met any in my 6 month stint there. Closest would be ladies night at a few bars where the Vietnamese imports were out for a good time.
Appreciate your feedback all the same.
At this stage I believe neither. Just posting a counter-point… and joshing a bit (some oversensitive types would say trolling).
The main point, to me, is that even if a 24-hour Sun exists in Antactica, it doesn't prove anything, this has been overhyped and all over the MSM. The fact that this guy (whom I had never heard of TBH) claims this or that is notable but not too much importance should be given to it. Shock value, a couple of punchlines… but ultimately, this "final experiment" resolves nothing.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now