Jump to content

Trump would have been convicted of election interference, DoJ report says


Recommended Posts

Posted

DOJ says Trump would have been convicted. 

 

Reminds me of Sol Wachtler's famous quote:  A prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich. (I'm paraphrasing).


I have no doubt that a jury in 97% Democrat Washington DC would convict Trump.  And thousands of potential jurors would give their eyeteeth to be on the jury that stopped the Bad Orange Man.  In any number of Blue venues.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, riclag said:

Smith was illegitimate.

 

Is there still a stigma attached to that?

 

Seems a bit harsh in this day and age.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, riclag said:

"Would have," "could have," and "should have" are used to express hypothetical situations or possibilities in the past. For example, "I would have come earlier, but I got stuck at work”.

 

I imagine a huge number of people reading that will be so grateful for your explanation.

 

I, for one, had no idea.

  • Haha 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

Is there still a stigma attached to that?

 

Seems a bit harsh in this day and age.

He does have a record of political prosecutions that end  up being reversed, but not until the Republican’s life is ruined. 

 

Any stigma attached to that? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

MAGAs live in a fantasy world, where their messiah is more infallible than a Borgia pontiff. They attack any critic as if the critic is a Danish cartoonist drawing haram images. A cult is a cult is a cult.

 

Just imagine if Kamala had 'done the right thing' and refused to certify the election, and Biden was intimately involved (according to his own appointed staff) with a fake elector scheme. Imagine if Antifa set up gallows next week in Lafayette Park and began chanting "Hang 47".

 

45 is guilty, only saved by endless delays, the pitty-appointment of Garland as AG, and a corrupt and captured Supreme Court.

 

Just as egregious as 45's behavior re the election he knew full well he lost, is his theft of highly classified documents, for which ANYONE else who pulled that stunt would be jailed AWAITING trial, not the beneficiary of a clown judge hoping to get a seat on the Supreme Court.

 

We will have a convicted felon as POTUS, who would have had many more convictions if actual justice had been served. That a plurality voted for him is an indication of what George Carlin said about the intellect of the average person. SO be it.

 

Those of us who know better have schadenfreude to enjoy as 47's total incompetence and---my opinion---psychopathy wreak havoc on the United States. It's going to be social and economic mayhem on a scale never seen.

 

MAGAs who disagree....just remember this post a year or two from now.

  • Love It 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Walker88 said:

MAGAs live in a fantasy world, where their messiah is more infallible than a Borgia pontiff. They attack any critic as if the critic is a Danish cartoonist drawing haram images. A cult is a cult is a cult.

 

Just imagine if Kamala had 'done the right thing' and refused to certify the election, and Biden was intimately involved (according to his own appointed staff) with a fake elector scheme. Imagine if Antifa set up gallows next week in Lafayette Park and began chanting "Hang 47".

 

45 is guilty, only saved by endless delays, the pitty-appointment of Garland as AG, and a corrupt and captured Supreme Court.

 

Just as egregious as 45's behavior re the election he knew full well he lost, is his theft of highly classified documents, for which ANYONE else who pulled that stunt would be jailed AWAITING trial, not the beneficiary of a clown judge hoping to get a seat on the Supreme Court.

 

We will have a convicted felon as POTUS, who would have had many more convictions if actual justice had been served. That a plurality voted for him is an indication of what George Carlin said about the intellect of the average person. SO be it.

 

Those of us who know better have schadenfreude to enjoy as 47's total incompetence and---my opinion---psychopathy wreak havoc on the United States. It's going to be social and economic mayhem on a scale never seen.

 

MAGAs who disagree....just remember this post a year or two from now.

bla bla bla

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, mogandave said:

bla bla bla

 

How embarrassing posting a response like that….at least make the effort to stick an aitch on the end for heaven’s sake...

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

 

How embarrassing posting a response like that….at least make the effort to stick an aitch on the end for heaven’s sake...

555

  • Love It 1
Posted

I can just imagine who are going to be convicted in the next 4 years.  Just saying. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, connda said:

I can just imagine who are going to be convicted in the next 4 years.  Just saying. 

I’m sure they’ll have broken the law and they’ll be prosecuted without fear or favour. And, of course, with any political involvement. 

Posted
8 hours ago, riclag said:

Oh.  Is Fox an unbiased, fair and balanced news/fact outlet?  I've read way too many threads on this platform to believe that they are both fair and balanced.

 

I know that the BBC is way far from perfect of course.  

 

Who is the unbiased news/fact outlet that all of us on AN might have a decent amount of confidence in?  It's not Fox.  Obviously.  But perhaps it is, but depending on an individuals's political persuasion?

 

You say it's not BBC, I will not disagree with you.  Way too many people don't agree to what MSNBC says.  I'd that factual or political?

 

Please advise.

Posted
1 minute ago, Watawattana said:

Oh.  Is Fox an unbiased, fair and balanced news/fact outlet?  I've read way too many threads on this platform to believe that they are both fair and balanced.

 

I know that the BBC is way far from perfect of course.  

 

Who is the unbiased news/fact outlet that all of us on AN might have a decent amount of confidence in?  It's not Fox.  Obviously.  But perhaps it is, but depending on an individuals's political persuasion?

 

You say it's not BBC, I will not disagree with you.  Way too many people don't agree to what MSNBC says.  I'd that factual or political?

 

Please advise.

Oh.  Maybe I got this all wrong.  Maybe it's X, Threads, Weibo, or perhaps Tinder?  

 

Of course, Tinder is likely the most trustworthy of these...  🙄🤪

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...