Just published Study by Global Team of 40 Scientists Reveals mRNA Vaccines Target the Heart

[Red Phoenix]

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-024-02528-1.pdf

 

A bombshell study published yesterday 14 January 2025 in the renowned journal Nature Biotechnology, titled “Nanocarrier Imaging at Single-Cell Resolution Across Entire Mouse Bodies With Deep Learning,” confirms concerns about mRNA vaccines. The work of 40 international top scientists from around the globe has revealed that the nanoparticles used in these genetic mRNA vaccines don't just stay in the arm muscle where they are injected but actually travel to other important organs, especially the heart. This discovery contradicts what health authorities have been telling the public.

Of course we already knew from Japanese FOI biodistribution data that Pfizer’s LNP reaches various parts of the body.

However, this paper shows that when the nanoparticles carrying mRNA were found in heart tissues, particularly within the endothelial cells of heart capillaries, researchers observed distinct changes in protein expression. These changes were associated with immune activation and blood vessel function.

Note: The above is a shortened version of the article on Aussie17's substack re this study and its implications

> https://www.aussie17.com/p/bombshell-study-by-global-team-of

= = =

[Red Phoenix]

23 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-024-02528-1.pdf

 

A bombshell study published yesterday 14 January 2025 in the renowned journal Nature Biotechnology, titled “Nanocarrier Imaging at Single-Cell Resolution Across Entire Mouse Bodies With Deep Learning,” confirms concerns about mRNA vaccines. The work of 40 international top scientists from around the globe has revealed that the nanoparticles used in these genetic mRNA vaccines don't just stay in the arm muscle where they are injected but actually travel to other important organs, especially the heart. This discovery contradicts what health authorities have been telling the public.

Of course we already knew from Japanese FOI biodistribution data that Pfizer’s LNP reaches various parts of the body.

However, this paper shows that when the nanoparticles carrying mRNA were found in heart tissues, particularly within the endothelial cells of heart capillaries, researchers observed distinct changes in protein expression. These changes were associated with immune activation and blood vessel function.

Note: The above is a shortened version of the article on Aussie17's substack re this study and its implications

> https://www.aussie17.com/p/bombshell-study-by-global-team-of

= = =

And here the intro and conclusion by Jeff Childers commenting on this new study in his free daily Coffee and Covid substack

> https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/coming-untrue-wednesday-january-15

 

> In the post-pandemic period, there were two particularly appalling and incontrovertible studies about the mRNA jabs that more than anything else started the slow reversal of science’s great stampede toward genetic therapies. The first was actually a group of studies, led by Kevin McKernan, confirming the shots were contaminated with DNA fragments of bacteria normally found in human waste. (Literally, “s— shots.”) The second was a gold-standard study finding “frame-shifting” (mutational drifts) in the induced spike proteins. Yesterday we received a third seminal study to help sink the shots and the Frankenstein’s nightmare called mRNA technology.

The peer-reviewed study published yesterday in the prestigious Nature Biotechology, titled “Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning.” It had forty authors. There’s safety in numbers. They cautiously avoided criticizing the covid shots directly, but the implications were unavoidable.

 

> The study’s findings [summarized in the article - see link] addressed in reveal the third structural problem with mRNA. Until those structural problems are solved, or even addressed, mRNA risks becoming nothing more than a forgettable footnote in the sordid history of scientific failure: a tragic tale of overpromised innovation and blind faith in cutting-edge technology, calamitously unraveled by unmet safety and efficacy standards.

And that is assuming things don’t get any worse. Which is the point—we don’t know. This study provided no reassurances. And it probably poisons all mRNA projects.

Take, for instance, the long-promised vision of using mRNA to deliver customized cancer cures. The concept involves encoding the mRNA with some protein from your specific cancer, in theory prompting the body to mount a targeted immune response. But so long as the treatment relies on lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver its mRNA payload, this study suggests a potentially catastrophic risk: the cancer protein could unintentionally transfect major off-target organs like the heart, liver, kidneys, and spleen, potentially spreading cancerous material throughout the body while simultaneously disrupting the immune system.

 

= = =

[placeholder]

On 1/16/2025 at 8:06 AM, Red Phoenix said:

And here the intro and conclusion by Jeff Childers commenting on this new study in his free daily Coffee and Covid substack

> https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/coming-untrue-wednesday-january-15

 

> In the post-pandemic period, there were two particularly appalling and incontrovertible studies about the mRNA jabs that more than anything else started the slow reversal of science’s great stampede toward genetic therapies. The first was actually a group of studies, led by Kevin McKernan, confirming the shots were contaminated with DNA fragments of bacteria normally found in human waste. (Literally, “s— shots.”) The second was a gold-standard study finding “frame-shifting” (mutational drifts) in the induced spike proteins. Yesterday we received a third seminal study to help sink the shots and the Frankenstein’s nightmare called mRNA technology.

The peer-reviewed study published yesterday in the prestigious Nature Biotechology, titled “Nanocarrier imaging at single-cell resolution across entire mouse bodies with deep learning.” It had forty authors. There’s safety in numbers. They cautiously avoided criticizing the covid shots directly, but the implications were unavoidable.

 

> The study’s findings [summarized in the article - see link] addressed in reveal the third structural problem with mRNA. Until those structural problems are solved, or even addressed, mRNA risks becoming nothing more than a forgettable footnote in the sordid history of scientific failure: a tragic tale of overpromised innovation and blind faith in cutting-edge technology, calamitously unraveled by unmet safety and efficacy standards.

And that is assuming things don’t get any worse. Which is the point—we don’t know. This study provided no reassurances. And it probably poisons all mRNA projects.

Take, for instance, the long-promised vision of using mRNA to deliver customized cancer cures. The concept involves encoding the mRNA with some protein from your specific cancer, in theory prompting the body to mount a targeted immune response. But so long as the treatment relies on lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver its mRNA payload, this study suggests a potentially catastrophic risk: the cancer protein could unintentionally transfect major off-target organs like the heart, liver, kidneys, and spleen, potentially spreading cancerous material throughout the body while simultaneously disrupting the immune system.

 

= = =

More nonsense. What this study doesn't address, and there's no reason it should have done so, is the epidemiological evidence about the cardiac harm inflicted by an mRNA vaccination vs the cardiac harm from not being vaccinated. And of course, even if it turns out that that vaccine harm is greater, the most salient issue is about the mortality rate of those vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated.

[candide]

On 1/15/2025 at 8:43 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-024-02528-1.pdf

 

A bombshell study published yesterday 14 January 2025 in the renowned journal Nature Biotechnology, titled “Nanocarrier Imaging at Single-Cell Resolution Across Entire Mouse Bodies With Deep Learning,” confirms concerns about mRNA vaccines. The work of 40 international top scientists from around the globe has revealed that the nanoparticles used in these genetic mRNA vaccines don't just stay in the arm muscle where they are injected but actually travel to other important organs, especially the heart. This discovery contradicts what health authorities have been telling the public.

Of course we already knew from Japanese FOI biodistribution data that Pfizer’s LNP reaches various parts of the body.

However, this paper shows that when the nanoparticles carrying mRNA were found in heart tissues, particularly within the endothelial cells of heart capillaries, researchers observed distinct changes in protein expression. These changes were associated with immune activation and blood vessel function.

Note: The above is a shortened version of the article on Aussie17's substack re this study and its implications

> https://www.aussie17.com/p/bombshell-study-by-global-team-of

= = =

This worrying and the subject certainly deserves further investigations.

 

However, I am always suspicious when something else is quoted, instead of the actual content of the article. As usual, I am right to be suspicious.

 

The article tests a new imaging method which is indeed quite promising.

However, a look at the article also reveals that:

- it was an experiment on mouses,

- the doses used were higher than the usual vaccine dose,

- what has been tested were not the actual vaccines used against Covid-19

 

Quote:

However, further research is needed 
to determine if similar effects occur in human subjects and to establish 
whether these molecular changes observed in mice are causally linked 
to reported clinical symptoms. We also used laboratory-produced 
LNP and mRNA spike formulations, which differ from approved Good 
Manufacturing Practice (GMP) facility-produced LNP-mRNA vaccines 
(Supplementary Fig. 22 and Supplementary Data 3 and 5)

 

[Petemcc64]

On 1/17/2025 at 7:12 PM, placeholder said:

More nonsense. What this study doesn't address, and there's no reason it should have done so, is the epidemiological evidence about the cardiac harm inflicted by an mRNA vaccination vs the cardiac harm from not being vaccinated. And of course, even if it turns out that that vaccine harm is greater, the most salient issue is about the mortality rate of those vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated.

why would there be any cardiac harm from the actual virus? ACE2 receptors, believed to be the main method of cellular infiltration, are in many tissues, but 'COVID' is a respiratory virus. For sure, anything that enters the respiratory system is nanometres from the circulatory system, but typically, respiratory viruses stick to the respiratory system. There is so much more involved than just the receptors, for example the pH, so don't assume because 'it' can, it will. On the other hand, a lipid nano particle with an encapsulated mRNA sequence, circulating in the blood , will potentially merge with any cell in the body, possibly allowing the encapsulated mRNA into the cell. 

There are no accurate data on the number of people who were 'saved' by the mRNA, or any other vaccine, only mathematical projections. How can it be demonstrated that the jab saved someone as opposed to 500 million years of immune systems? It can't. 

I have a Masters in Public Health, which I admit I undertook because a work colleague at the start of COVID said I knew nothing, despite being a biochemist, who had played with transposons and retrotransposons, things 99.99% of people will never have heard of, and Phages, so I know about the transfer of genetic material. I was also a nurse for 15 years. 

Various health officers decided they knew what was what, even if their discipline had nothing to do with virology or immunology, but they didn't, they were clueless. They all decided to follow the Chinese model of control, and the WHO's dictate of vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate, despite being told that a systemic vaccine against a respiratory virus was useless.

Then came the absolutely unbelievable fable that vaccination would prevent transmission. 

I could go on, and on, but the bottom line is that not only were the 'vaccinations' unecessary, they were not safe, not effective, and have caused immense harm, and possibly more harm to come.