"You Want The Truth?" USAID's International 'News Media Propaganda Industrial Complex'

[rwilem]

First, word got out about Politico being funded by USAID cutouts. The looney lefties scoffed, 'no can't be, the source is not legit'. Yeah...

 

Then the BBC and NY Times were also discovered to be among other 'news' outlets, as being recipients of USAID monies, for slanted, dishonest 'coverage'.

 

Now perhaps the biggest bombshell.

 

From Wikileaks, a far, far more credible source than the MSM regime-now-resistance media that so misinforms the public, especially the lefties who reject any reporting that isn't aired by MSDNC, DNN or written by the Times, the Post, AP, Reuters, etc.

 

As usual, when going deep the detailed receipts are included. The 'Internews Network' has been selected for exposure. 

 

 

 

Can also view the complete thread from the thread reader app by opening the link, copy and paste, below.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888072129327083979.html

 

 

 

 

[candide]

3 hours ago, rwilem said:

First, word got out about Politico being funded by USAID cutouts. The looney lefties scoffed, 'no can't be, the source is not legit'. Yeah...

 

Then the BBC and NY Times were also discovered to be among other 'news' outlets, as being recipients of USAID monies, for slanted, dishonest 'coverage'.

 

Now perhaps the biggest bombshell.

 

From Wikileaks, a far, far more credible source than the MSM regime-now-resistance media that so misinforms the public, especially the lefties who reject any reporting that isn't aired by MSDNC, DNN or written by the Times, the Post, AP, Reuters, etc.

 

As usual, when going deep the detailed receipts are included. The 'Internews Network' has been selected for exposure. 

 

 

 

Can also view the complete thread from the thread reader app by opening the link, copy and paste, below.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888072129327083979.html

 

 

 

 

Another ridiculous fake MAGA scandal. There's nothing secretive about Internews! 🤣🤣🤣

 

Internews Network,[3] now Internews, is a 501(c)(3) organization incorporated in California, formed in 1982. It was founded by David M. Hoffman,[4][5] Kim Spencer, and Evelyn Messinger. The president and CEO is Jeanne Bourgault. Internews headquarters is located at 876 7th St, Arcata, California.

Internews

Established1982  (43 years ago)

Typesnonprofit organization 

CountryUnited States

Coordinates40°52′04″N 124°05′17″W[1][2] 

Websitewww.internews.org 

Internews Europe is an independent media development organization, based in London, United Kingdom and relying mainly on European funding. Internews Europe is chaired by Mark Stephens. One of the organization's first projects was a series of Spacebridges that connected the U.S. and Soviet Union by satellite,[6] a program that culminated with a TV series named "Capital to Capital" that aired on ABC and won an Emmy Award in 1988.[7]

In early 2015, Internews Network and Internews Europe began to integrate more closely and operate cooperatively with independent boards of directors.[8]

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internews

[riclag]

Assange  has chimed  in  , Welcome Back Julian

[riclag]

9 hours ago, rwilem said:

First, word got out about Politico being funded by USAID cutouts. The looney lefties scoffed, 'no can't be, the source is not legit'. Yeah...

 

Then the BBC and NY Times were also discovered to be among other 'news' outlets, as being recipients of USAID monies, for slanted, dishonest 'coverage'.

 

Now perhaps the biggest bombshell.

 

From Wikileaks, a far, far more credible source than the MSM regime-now-resistance media that so misinforms the public, especially the lefties who reject any reporting that isn't aired by MSDNC, DNN or written by the Times, the Post, AP, Reuters, etc.

 

As usual, when going deep the detailed receipts are included. The 'Internews Network' has been selected for exposure. 

 

 

 

Can also view the complete thread from the thread reader app by opening the link, copy and paste, below.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888072129327083979.html

 

 

 

 

Assange, Musk & Trump !

 

[placeholder]

9 hours ago, rwilem said:

First, word got out about Politico being funded by USAID cutouts. The looney lefties scoffed, 'no can't be, the source is not legit'. Yeah...

 

Then the BBC and NY Times were also discovered to be among other 'news' outlets, as being recipients of USAID monies, for slanted, dishonest 'coverage'.

 

Now perhaps the biggest bombshell.

 

From Wikileaks, a far, far more credible source than the MSM regime-now-resistance media that so misinforms the public, especially the lefties who reject any reporting that isn't aired by MSDNC, DNN or written by the Times, the Post, AP, Reuters, etc.

 

As usual, when going deep the detailed receipts are included. The 'Internews Network' has been selected for exposure. 

 

 

 

Can also view the complete thread from the thread reader app by opening the link, copy and paste, below.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888072129327083979.html

 

 

 

 

Believing in the Big Lie much?

"The BBC, for example, was said to have received approximately $3.2 million (2.6 million pounds) during the 2023-2024 financial year. But that money didn’t go to its news operation. It went to BBC Media Action, an international charity that is “part of the BBC family,” but editorially and financially separate from BBC News, the charity said in a statement. It accounted for about 8% of BBC Media Action’s budget that year."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/claims-usaid-funding-spreading-online-205600612.html

 

 

"USAspending.gov can correctly filter specific payments to The New York Times which shows that over the last five years, government agencies spent about $1.6 million, almost entirely on subscriptions. Other payments include ads, legal notices and delivery charges.

Over the past 17 years, the period Cheong searched under, total spending came to $3.1 million.

The New York Times' managing director of external communications, Charlie Stadtlander, told Newsweek: "It was surprising to see social media attention on the fact that a small number of government offices, libraries and courts purchase subscriptions to The New York Times and other media outlets."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-us-government-did-not-give-new-york-times-tens-millions-2027981

[Gsxrnz]

I picked up on the phrase "diploma in lesbian dance theory" being used to epitomize left wing woke education lunacy a number of years ago. I often wondered where the term originated.

 

I'm now reasonably confident that Elon and DOGE will eventually find a USAID donation specifically to an allegedly altruist organisation that does in fact, promote the theory of lesbian dancing. 

 

I mean, they've come pretty close to it with transgender operas and comic books, and DEI musicals - but surely the pièce de résistance would be to finally reveal why this particular phrase came into existence. 

[rwilem]

Ye shall know them by their own words.

 

Internews CEO. From guess where. And leading the discussion on the topic. (Hey, isn't one of the speakers a guy who's just been canned?)

 

Add censorship to Internews' activities, check.

 

 

[candide]

14 minutes ago, rwilem said:

Ye shall know them by their own words.

 

Internews CEO. From guess where. And leading the discussion on the topic. (Hey, isn't one of the speakers a guy who's just been canned?)

 

Add censorship to Internews' activities, check.

 

 

A SM posts from the trusted Mario Nawfal! 😆

 

BTW, you claimed it was a secretive organisation, and now we learn this secretive organisation is so well-known that it speaks at the WEF! 

[candide]

7 hours ago, placeholder said:

Believing in the Big Lie much?

"The BBC, for example, was said to have received approximately $3.2 million (2.6 million pounds) during the 2023-2024 financial year. But that money didn’t go to its news operation. It went to BBC Media Action, an international charity that is “part of the BBC family,” but editorially and financially separate from BBC News, the charity said in a statement. It accounted for about 8% of BBC Media Action’s budget that year."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/claims-usaid-funding-spreading-online-205600612.html

 

 

"USAspending.gov can correctly filter specific payments to The New York Times which shows that over the last five years, government agencies spent about $1.6 million, almost entirely on subscriptions. Other payments include ads, legal notices and delivery charges.

Over the past 17 years, the period Cheong searched under, total spending came to $3.1 million.

The New York Times' managing director of external communications, Charlie Stadtlander, told Newsweek: "It was surprising to see social media attention on the fact that a small number of government offices, libraries and courts purchase subscriptions to The New York Times and other media outlets."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-us-government-did-not-give-new-york-times-tens-millions-2027981

These sheep's just repost whatever B.S. tweet they receive, without checking anything! 🤣

[paddypower]

7 hours ago, placeholder said:

Believing in the Big Lie much?

"The BBC, for example, was said to have received approximately $3.2 million (2.6 million pounds) during the 2023-2024 financial year. But that money didn’t go to its news operation. It went to BBC Media Action, an international charity that is “part of the BBC family,” but editorially and financially separate from BBC News, the charity said in a statement. It accounted for about 8% of BBC Media Action’s budget that year."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/claims-usaid-funding-spreading-online-205600612.html

 

 

"USAspending.gov can correctly filter specific payments to The New York Times which shows that over the last five years, government agencies spent about $1.6 million, almost entirely on subscriptions. Other payments include ads, legal notices and delivery charges.

Over the past 17 years, the period Cheong searched under, total spending came to $3.1 million.

The New York Times' managing director of external communications, Charlie Stadtlander, told Newsweek: "It was surprising to see social media attention on the fact that a small number of government offices, libraries and courts purchase subscriptions to The New York Times and other media outlets."

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-us-government-did-not-give-new-york-times-tens-millions-2027981

the only way to stop all this slagging of USAID by the MAGA is to post that video of Trump entertaining Epstein and a truck load of what appears to be coked-up, high-as-kites ladies.

[frank83628]

13 hours ago, candide said:

Another ridiculous fake MAGA scandal. There's nothing secretive about Internews! 🤣🤣🤣

 

Internews Network,[3] now Internews, is a 501(c)(3) organization incorporated in California, formed in 1982. It was founded by David M. Hoffman,[4][5] Kim Spencer, and Evelyn Messinger. The president and CEO is Jeanne Bourgault. Internews headquarters is located at 876 7th St, Arcata, California.

Internews

Established1982  (43 years ago)

Typesnonprofit organization 

CountryUnited States

Coordinates40°52′04″N 124°05′17″W[1][2] 

Websitewww.internews.org 

Internews Europe is an independent media development organization, based in London, United Kingdom and relying mainly on European funding. Internews Europe is chaired by Mark Stephens. One of the organization's first projects was a series of Spacebridges that connected the U.S. and Soviet Union by satellite,[6] a program that culminated with a TV series named "Capital to Capital" that aired on ABC and won an Emmy Award in 1988.[7]

In early 2015, Internews Network and Internews Europe began to integrate more closely and operate cooperatively with independent boards of directors.[8]

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internews

So totally ignore the nearly 1/2 billion dollars then

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, paddypower said:

the only way to stop all this slagging of USAID by the MAGA is to post that video of Trump entertaining Epstein and a truck load of what appears to be coked-up, high-as-kites ladies.

I'd prefer the release the whole Epstein client list... then we'd see where Trump is compared to the rest 

[candide]

5 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So totally ignore the nearly 1/2 billion dollars then

What's wrong with it (if true)? 

It's a legit organisation also funded by the EU, etc...

 

Nothing secretive! Ex.

 

https://internews.org/call-for-applications-usaid-strengthening-civil-society-and-media-systems-sawt-core-grants/

[paddypower]

3 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

I'd prefer the release the whole Epstein client list... then we'd see where Trump is compared to the rest 

You have seen this, then. ? 

.  Trump will never escape the moniker ' The only President of the US found guilty of what is defined in NY State as 'rape'.

[placeholder]

17 hours ago, rwilem said:

First, word got out about Politico being funded by USAID cutouts. The looney lefties scoffed, 'no can't be, the source is not legit'. Yeah...

 

 

Can also view the complete thread from the thread reader app by opening the link, copy and paste, below.

 

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888072129327083979.html

 

 

 

 

And then word gout out that it was a lie about Politico being funded  by cutouts. In fact, it was subscriptions. But if subscribing to Politico is something sinister then Speaker Mike Johnson and Laura Boebert are also guilty. 

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, paddypower said:

You have seen this, then. ? 

.  Trump will never escape the moniker ' The only President of the US found guilty of what is defined in NY State as 'rape'.

Who hasnt seen it, the clip is decades old, why has it gone nowhere is all this time?

Try again screetchy sore loser🤡

[paddypower]

14 hours ago, frank83628 said:

Who hasnt seen it, the clip is decades old, why has it gone nowhere is all this time?

Try again screetchy sore loser🤡

you are (deliberately) missing the point, a very MAGA disease.  the age of the vid. is not important. all it shows is that Trump was (and still is) a lecher . I'm also in favor of the Epstein client list being published. the reason ( to quote Trump's words)  'too many powerful people would get hurt'.  you're a denialist.

[frank83628]

9 minutes ago, paddypower said:

you are (deliberately) missing the point, a very MAGA disease.  the age of the vid. is not important. all it shows is that Trump was (and still is) a lecher . I'm also in favor of the Epstein client list being published. the reason ( to quote Trump's words)  'too many powerful people would get hurt'.  you're a denialist.

No, you have missed my point, Don't you think that the Democrat backing mainstream media would have exposed Trump by now had there been any proper links to Epsteins dodgy side, or cant you think logically due to your trump derangement?

He is attacked daily by the media in one way or another, if there was anything there the media would have been all over it.

I don't doubt Trump knew Epstein, they mixed in the same circles of the wealthy and I'm sure there were many parties with both there, along with many young women, cameras and media, however its what happened behind close doors at Epsteins island that are of interest to everyone. AFAIK Trump never visited, and he also banned Epstein from any of his premisis after he saw him being inappropriate with a young female. I believe it was a friends daughter.

I don't think many AN members can get on their moral high horse when it comes shagging young girls.

[frank83628]

17 hours ago, candide said:

What's wrong with it (if true)? 

It's a legit organisation also funded by the EU, etc...

 

Nothing secretive! Ex.

 

https://internews.org/call-for-applications-usaid-strengthening-civil-society-and-media-systems-sawt-core-grants/

Well its lucky Trump picked Musk & DOGE to do the audit rather than you.