Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A post with a profane flaming comment toward another member has been removed:

  • Be polite and respectful to other users.
  • Avoid flaming, trolling, or stalking other members.
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
5 hours ago, bubblegum said:

It looks again that Trump and his minions don't care about Nato. Of cause being dumb as **** they don't really know a thing about it. Trump thinks that all the Nato countries pay money, put it in a big pot and buy an army. Now there is a lot of talk about Nato's article 5 where if 1 member is attacked all allies will retaliate. In the last 70 or more years this has actually only happened once and guess who needed the help???

 

Yes the USA. 

no,  because NATO was obsolete since the end of the cold war... 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tug said:

Ahhh Mike I hate to break it to ya this ain’t the age of sail anymore……every thing is intertwined like it or not NATO exists to safeguard against warmongering expansionist regimes ie Russia especially under putin,I’m on the side of democracy who’s side are you on?

If you defend NATO, you are on the side of warmogerers

  • Sad 2
Posted

Trump is helping Russia defund NATO so Putin can retake its lost territory, Ukraine and Poland. Trump owes Russia for the condos and the money laundering, so no problem.

  • Sad 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, cjinchiangrai said:

Trump is helping Russia defund NATO so Putin can retake its lost territory, Ukraine and Poland. Trump owes Russia for the condos and the money laundering, so no problem.

Here's a conspiracy theroist with wild accusations

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, bubblegum said:

It looks again that Trump and his minions don't care about Nato. Of cause being dumb as **** they don't really know a thing about it. Trump thinks that all the Nato countries pay money, put it in a big pot and buy an army. Now there is a lot of talk about Nato's article 5 where if 1 member is attacked all allies will retaliate. In the last 70 or more years this has actually only happened once and guess who needed the help???

 

Yes the USA. 

How's the map reading going? 

  • Confused 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Obviously reading is a bid hard for you. I will repeat it just for you: The only !! country ever to need art. 5 was the USA ! Get it?

 

Plus they needed help in Asia.

 

NATO covers all NATO member north of the Tropic of Cancer.

 

Dimwits say NATO only exists to protect Europe. But they are also mostly flat-earth believers. So when they look at a map of the world, they think Finland is some where near the right handside of the map and far from them.

 

If Russia decided to take a pop at Alaska on the specious grounds America stole it from them by doing a deal with a criminal regime. if it were not the fact that Canada is a good friend and ally (despite the money the US owes Canada from 200+ years ago), the US woud find it quite challenging to get reinforcements there. Its way cheaper to base US troops in the benign environment of Europe, compared to the arduous  climate of Alaska.

 

Better not let Trump get wind of the territorial status of the Bering Sea, which was settled in 1893, that very nearly lead Great Britain going to war against the United States (the arbitration court settled in favour of Britain).

 

image.jpeg.64fabef0108d9ebdda35773e547e348b.jpeg

 

Europe usefully deflects Russia's attention from  one of its neighbours. NATO regularly conducts exercises and freedom of navifation drills in the Bering Sea (the bit where Sarah Palin could see Russia from)

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Purdey said:

NATO would have to protect the USA if Russia or China attacked it. It isn't just about Europe. 

 

And in the Arctic, the US is much closer to Russia or China than Western Europe.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

But people like you are just Stalin loving Commies. Stalin was best buds with Hitler for a while.

Way before my time, Maybe not yours though.

Putin is the man of this era.

 

 

  • Sad 3
Posted
3 hours ago, MicroB said:

 

But people like you are just Stalin loving Commies. Stalin was best buds with Hitler for a while.

You must have missed Yalta when the allies decided eastern europe wasn't worth saving for democracy. cF Ukraine today plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

Posted
1 hour ago, candide said:
4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

If you defend NATO, you are on the side of warmogerers

Says someone who defends a war maker (Putin)! 😂

 

Could you show exactly where he defended putin. Probably not. But anyone who disagrees with your worldview is a maga putin lover.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Could you show exactly where he defended putin. Probably not. But anyone who disagrees with your worldview is a maga putin lover.

He said he loved Putin many time, look it up yourself or are you to lazy and think false accusations are the new normal.

Posted
17 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

He said he loved Putin many time, look it up yourself or are you to lazy and think false accusations are the new normal.

 

No he hasn't stop lying. It's not on me to prove. It's on you. You made the accusation. If proven wrong I will apologise.

 

Now go do your due diligence.

  • Haha 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Could you show exactly where he defended putin. Probably not. But anyone who disagrees with your worldview is a maga putin lover.

Lol! Have a look at the Ukraine thread. He's been continuously defending Putin's actions, 😆

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...