Alina Habba Confirms New Criminal Prosecutions Expected Following Epstein File Release

[stevenl]

5 hours ago, frank83628 said:

'Conspiracy addicts' from a guy that just said Trump was probably involved in Epstein's death

Clearly showing English is not your first language plus you don't care about the truth.

[theshu25]

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

[placeholder]

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

That has to be the most outrageous thing I've heard on this while forum. Haha, you live in a fantasy land

 

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

'Conspiracy addicts' from a guy that just said Trump was probably involved in Epstein's death

Now I have to give you a remedial reading lesson. But before I do that, I'd like to point out that would be typical for a right-winger to stop with that first sentence and not explain why you need a remedial reading lesson. Here's what I wrote: 

 

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

 

You don't seem to understand the significance of "if there was foul play".  I did not claim that it was likely that there was foul play on the part of Trump. In fact as I have pointed out in this very thread Trump supporters who push a conspiracy theory have repeatedly gotten the facts wrong. There is no good evidence that Epstein's death was due to anything other than suicide and incompetence on the part of a very badly run prison.

 

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, theshu25 said:

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

Your certainty is unwarranted by the facts of the case.

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

 

Now I have to give you a remedial reading lesson. But before I do that, I'd like to point out that would be typical for a right-winger to stop with that first sentence and not explain why you need a remedial reading lesson. Here's what I wrote: 

 

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

 

You don't seem to understand the significance of "if there was foul play".  I did not claim that it was likely that there was foul play on the part of Trump. In fact as I have pointed out in this very thread Trump supporters who push a conspiracy theory have repeatedly gotten the facts wrong. There is no good evidence that Epstein's death was due to anything other than suicide and incompetence on the part of a very badly run prison.

 

So you dont think it was foul play, but if it was then it would have been Trump because he was president.

My reading comprehension if perfectly fine.

 

[placeholder]

16 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So you dont think it was foul play, but if it was then it would have been Trump because he was president.

My reading comprehension if perfectly fine.

 

You continue to demonstrate your need for remedial reading. Here's the relevant part of my quote salient to your latest instance of miscomprehension.,

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

Do "likely" and  "a good chance" signify an assertion of fact?  I really don't have the time have to explain to you the difference between probability and certainty? I will offer you an explanation from AI but the problem is that, given your past form, there's a good chance you'll misconstrue this as well. Still, I live in hope:

 

"Probability is the likelihood of an event happening, while certainty is the state of being absolutely sure about something"

https://www.google.com/search?q=probability+vs+certainty&oq=probability+vs+certainty&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgkIABBFGDkYgAQyCQgAEEUYORiABDIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIKCAQQABiABBiiBDIHCAUQABjvBdIBCDg3MThqMGoxqAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

[frank83628]

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

You continue to demonstrate your need for remedial reading. Here's the relevant part of my quote salient to your latest instance of miscomprehension.,

Given that it occurred in a Federal prison while Trump was President, it seems likely that if there was foul play there's a good chance Trump was behind it.

Do "likely" and  "a good chance" signify an assertion of fact?  I really don't have the time have to explain to you the difference between probability and certainty? I will offer you an explanation from AI but the problem is that, given your past form, there's a good chance you'll misconstrue this as well. Still, I live in hope:

 

"Probability is the likelihood of an event happening, while certainty is the state of being absolutely sure about something"

https://www.google.com/search?q=probability+vs+certainty&oq=probability+vs+certainty&gs_lcrp=EgRlZGdlKgkIABBFGDkYgAQyCQgAEEUYORiABDIICAEQABgWGB4yCAgCEAAYFhgeMggIAxAAGBYYHjIKCAQQABiABBiiBDIHCAUQABjvBdIBCDg3MThqMGoxqAIAsAIB&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

I know exactly what you wrote.

With rewards to words like 'likely, possibility, reportedly, allegedly' you might want to be mindful  of those when commentling in the furture and adding legacy media links to prove a point.

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

I know exactly what you wrote.

With rewards to words like 'likely, possibility, reportedly, allegedly' you might want to be mindful  of those when commentling in the furture and adding legacy media links to prove a point.

Well, the only evidence I have of your understanding is what you write. And what you wrote clearly got it wrong. And the fact that you don't specifically address the points I've raised with some sort of rational refutation or acknowledge that your comments were in error, doesn't demonstrate that you "know exactly" what I wrote.

[Yagoda]

On 3/1/2025 at 7:19 AM, JAG said:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Ill guarantee you the Trump is not on the client list.

 

Bet ya tons of NY Dems though.

[Yagoda]

4 hours ago, theshu25 said:

As if the orange conman  freak was not a part of that scene. I am sure anything to do with his name on it has been deleted.

Yep, so all you guys can do from here on in is mentally masturbate over stuff that doesnt exist.

[frank83628]

17 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Well, the only evidence I have of your understanding is what you write. And what you wrote clearly got it wrong. And the fact that you don't specifically address the points I've raised with some sort of rational refutation or acknowledge that your comments were in error, doesn't demonstrate that you "know exactly" what I wrote.

you're mind numbingly boring.  

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

you're mind numbingly boring.  

Just another empty insult. You've got nothing.

[Briggsy]

On 3/1/2025 at 7:19 AM, JAG said:

“I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Mr. Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Putin chuckles, "This is nothing compared to what I have on Trump."

[Red Forever]

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Ill guarantee you the Trump is not on the client list.

 

Bet ya tons of NY Dems though.

Yeah sure susan/ thaibeachlovers . In yer dreams.

[Yagoda]

42 minutes ago, Red Forever said:

Yeah sure susan/ thaibeachlovers . In yer dreams.

Who are those people? Are you having a freak out because you just know, deep down inside, that one or more of your political and cultural heroes was jetting off with Jeffy for some paedo fun?

 

Somebody is hiding something and it aint Trump