Ukrainian forces lose access to Maxar satellite

[Dan O]

11 hours ago, frank83628 said:

But he hasn't made a statement has he, that's the whole ppint, some lame stream media are reporting on somethng that might or might not have been said in private....what part of that don't you understand.

Trump has not made any official statements in relation to what you have claimed.

 

My statements are accurate learn to read 

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, Hellfire said:

Despite their (superficial) differences, what they have in common is that they are both dictators who, when given the opportunity, play big—as big as possible. Being a small-minded MAGA supporter (with their Lilliputian pettiness) likely makes it impossible to grasp the mindset and motives of those wielding vast, unrestricted power. Mad Vlad did not start all this to conquer a dozen of cities like Avdiivka!

20% of Ukraine vs many countries taken. 72yo vs 52yo. I don't see it.

[Hellfire]

25 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

20% of Ukraine vs many countries taken. 72yo vs 52yo. I don't see it.

I see no problem with Putin staying in power for another 20 years. There’s also a strong chance that his successor will continue his policies.

 

That 20%—once again, we have the Ukrainians to thank for it, not betray them. If Ukraine falls, Putin will have a clear path into NATO states like the Baltics and Poland—wherever he chooses. And let’s not forget those nukes, the mere mention of which sends MAGA men scrambling under the table.

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, Hellfire said:

I see no problem with Putin staying in power for another 20 years. There’s also a strong chance that his successor will continue his policies.

 

That 20%—once again, we have the Ukrainians to thank for it, not betray them. If Ukraine falls, Putin will have a clear path into NATO states like the Baltics and Poland—wherever he chooses. And let’s not forget those nukes, the mere mention of which sends MAGA men scrambling under the table.

NATO will beat Russia. But it's just another climate crisis drama. You guys move from one alarmist project to the next.

[frank83628]

52 minutes ago, Hellfire said:

The real problem is people like you who believe that Putin (and his regime) will be fully satisfied with annexing just a part of Ukraine—just as many once believed Hitler would be satisfied with annexing the Sudetenland. Looking back now, don’t you see how foolish those people were?

 

Please, take your time and watch a couple of Putin’s speeches from right before his full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In them, he demanded that NATO withdraw military infrastructure from countries that joined after 1997, including Poland, the Baltic states, and others. (The only reason these countries joined NATO in the first place was to protect themselves from another Russian invasion. Nobody in Eastern Europe thought about ever invading Russia).

 

The only reason people like you have forgotten these Putin escapades of just 3 years ago is because of the truly heroic resistance of the Ukrainian people. Now go ahead—stab these brave people in the back, and soon you’ll find yourself dealing with Putin attacking NATO countries. And when that happens, the only ones surprised will be those with the memory span of the average TikTok user.

so basically Putin is Hitler 2.0 and he is just itching to invdade Europe!!

Haha what a joke,  you really are living in a fantasy world,

fear of the bogeyman. Not sure where you get your info, but its absolutely mental.

[Hellfire]

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

NATO will beat Russia. But it's just another climate crisis drama. You guys move from one alarmist project to the next.

Yeah, Russia and Putin never invaded anywhere and never annexed the chunks of other countries.  Putin never demanded of Nato to get out of Eastern Europe. And of course, Trump and his supporters will fight until the end for Estonia! No doubt!
So - pure alarmism, nothing else.

[Hellfire]

Just now, frank83628 said:

so basically Putin is Hitler 2.0 and he is just itching to invdade Europe!!

Haha what a joke,  you really are living in a fantasy world,

fear of the bogeyman. Not sure where you get your info, but its absolutely mental.

I quoted Putin’s speech right before invasion: Nato - back to 1997 borders! This is your KGB God saying, not me. How dare you doubt his words?

[Harrisfan]

2 minutes ago, Hellfire said:

Yeah, Russia and Putin never invaded anywhere and never annexed the chunks of other countries.  Putin never demanded of Nato to get out of Eastern Europe. And of course, Trump and his supporters will fight until the end for Estonia! No doubt!
So - pure alarmism, nothing else.

25 years of alarmism. You guys are always wrong.

[Hellfire]

Just now, Harrisfan said:

25 years of alarmism. You guys are always wrong.

I am done talking to you

[Harrisfan]

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

so basically Putin is Hitler 2.0 and he is just itching to invdade Europe!!

Haha what a joke,  you really are living in a fantasy world,

fear of the bogeyman. Not sure where you get your info, but its absolutely mental.

They read Wiki. 

[Harrisfan]

Just now, Hellfire said:

I am done talking to you

[transam]

13 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

so basically Putin is Hitler 2.0 and he is just itching to invdade Europe!!

Haha what a joke,  you really are living in a fantasy world,

fear of the bogeyman. Not sure where you get your info, but its absolutely mental.

Talking of absolutely mental, I will ask you once again, why did Finland and Sweden join NATO after always being neutral.

Now take your time answering, don't rush it, and most of all, reply sensibly.........🤔

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

Nice try deflecting and gaslighting the situation. He's on the clock always so "official" statement or statement in discussions are all "on record". Wake up dude, anything he says is what he's thinking, planning or considering. No one will now exactly what will happen with the "peace deal" until its done. trump isnt working for peace he's working for a business deal and they are 2 totally different things. To stop the aide intentionally so Russia can take advantage of the Ukraine's ability to defend themselves and increase fighting just to add pressure to make Ukraine give up resources and part of their country is shameful. If you back tactics like that you are not much better than him. I'm done with you on this topic. you have a great day

Again i am not deflecting or gaslighting, you made a made a claim backs up by 2 links that didn't confirm anything.

there wasn't any verification of what was supposedly said. in private. 'An aide said' is not proof of an event, so that whole story is fabricated.

If the article provided a name to the aide then that would be different.

Its just false story, the same as there was a rift between musk & Rubio, the media were not in the meeting, but ran with the story like it was true, asked questions as though is was true even though all those involved denied the claim.

You keep on being fed with your fake news, so many times have they been proven wrong but the gullible continue regardless. 

 

[frank83628]

17 minutes ago, Hellfire said:

I quoted Putin’s speech right before invasion: Nato - back to 1997 borders! This is your KGB God saying, not me. How dare you doubt his words?

Yeah, I bet the speech didn't say "NATO needs to retreat or I will invade" though.

 

Post a link to this speech

 

[frank83628]

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Talking of absolutely mental, I will ask you once again, why did Finland and Sweden join NATO after always being neutral.

Now take your time answering, don't rush it, and most of all, reply sensibly.........🤔

Because they have weak politicians who were fed fear, the whole thing was rushed through in a matter of days. 

[transam]

Just now, frank83628 said:

Because they have weak politicians who were fed fear, the whole thing was rushed through in a matter of days. 

I did ask you to take your time and post something sensible......🤔

 

"Fed fear", you really are a brainwashed character, I just knew I shouldn't have asked you a sensible question....

[jas007]

On 3/8/2025 at 8:53 AM, simple1 said:

Trump is a traitor to Democratic forces stopping access to essential services for Ukraine. The result being more Ukrainian deaths at the hands of the invader.

 

Ukrainian access to U.S. government-purchased commercial satellite imagery, which includes Maxar, was suspended, a National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) spokesperson told ABC News.

The development came after the U.S. paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine.

 

https://abcnews.go.com/International/russia-conducts-massive-aerial-attack-ukraine-overnight/story?id=119543077

Isn't this irrelevant? From what I understand, Ukraine has access to Musk's Starlink system, and targeting operations are continuing by way of Palantir's system.  As such, Ukraine continues to have access to the best defensive intelligence the world has to offer.  Why would they need government-purchased commercial satellite imagery?  Why would they need pictures that are inferior to what they currently have on a real time basis? 

[frank83628]

16 minutes ago, transam said:

I did ask you to take your time and post something sensible......🤔

 

"Fed fear", you really are a brainwashed character, I just knew I shouldn't have asked you a sensible question....

I am uninterested in anything you have to say here, my reply reflects that. 

[transam]

Just now, frank83628 said:

I am uninterested in anything you have to say here, my reply reflects that. 

More like, you are cornered.......

 

[frank83628]

4 minutes ago, transam said:

More like, you are cornered.......

 

Yes, that's it tranny, you got me, Cornered and buried. I am probably not going to post again as I will be too busy digging myself out of this hole.

That will teach me for messing with AN's very own Mensa member.

[simple1]

25 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Isn't this irrelevant? From what I understand, Ukraine has access to Musk's Starlink system, and targeting operations are continuing by way of Palantir's system.  As such, Ukraine continues to have access to the best defensive intelligence the world has to offer.  Why would they need government-purchased commercial satellite imagery?  Why would they need pictures that are inferior to what they currently have on a real time basis? 

 

Starlink and other US associated services withdrawn at the behest of trump Admin.

[transam]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Yes, that's it tranny, you got me, Cornered and buried. I am probably not going to post again as I will be too busy digging myself out of this hole.

That will teach me for messing with AN's very own Mensa member.

Well done, you retire gracefully, as you cannot, will not, answer relevant questions...

[frank83628]

1 minute ago, simple1 said:

 

Starlink and other US associated services withdrawn at the behest of trump Admin.

Great job, 

[Harrisfan]

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Well done, you retire gracefully, as you cannot, will not, answer relevant questions...

Says the guy who does not know how wars start.

[simple1]

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Illegal perhaps, but unprovoked? Oh dear, you are so indoctrinated by western propaganda. Try doing some research on non western propaganda sites. You might learn something.

 

Yes, unprovoked. It's not Russia's legal prerogative to dictate what a sovereign state can or cannot do within their own territory.I suggest you might learn some truths by not condoning BS from trump and Co or other pro Russian propaganda outlets.

[jas007]

10 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Starlink and other US associated services withdrawn at the behest of trump Admin.

Did they really? I don't think so.  Do you know who Alex Karp is?   Palantir's CEO and a staunch supporter of Ukraine and the USA.  Musk has continued to maintain that he will never allow Ukraine's access to Starlink to be to be cut off.  Access to commercial satellite imagery is a different issue entirely.  There may be some overlap, but I think Starlink access remains, along with Palantir targeting availability.

 

[frank83628]

5 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Yes, unprovoked. It's not Russia's legal prerogative to dictate what a sovereign state can or cannot do within their own territory.I suggest you might learn some truths by not condoning BS from trump and Co or other pro Russian propaganda outlets.

No, everyone should follow the news you do, because you are soo informed and factual🤔

[Dan O]

51 minutes ago, transam said:

I did ask you to take your time and post something sensible......🤔

 

"Fed fear", you really are a brainwashed character, I just knew I shouldn't have asked you a sensible question....

He cant reply with anything sensible. He defaults to the standard MAGA lines with empty claims and deflection from truth and facts with excuses and what-aboutism. The Maga group are just sheep in a line looking at the butthole in front of them

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

25 years of alarmism. You guys are always wrong.

Got to keep the fear going, there is an evil dictator just around the corner, waiting to be evil once oil, gas & resources are discovered

[simple1]

32 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Did they really? I don't think so.  Do you know who Alex Karp is?   Palantir's CEO and a staunch supporter of Ukraine and the USA.  Musk has continued to maintain that he will never allow Ukraine's access to Starlink to be to be cut off.  Access to commercial satellite imagery is a different issue entirely.  There may be some overlap, but I think Starlink access remains, along with Palantir targeting availability.

 

 

Trump's Halt on Ukraine Military Aid Puts U.S. Defense Contracts, Palantir at Riskhttps://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-halt-ukraine-military-aid-175735755.html