Jump to content

Curiosity Rover Uncovers the Most Significant Organic Discovery on Mars


Recommended Posts

Posted

Aliphatics have been known to exist in meteorites for years and this could also be the reason for their presence on Mars. Chains up to C31H64 have been detected but how such chemicals got there is still a matter of research. Aliphatics are known to be present in Interstellar dust and identified on the surface of the dwarf planet Ceres. 

  • Agree 2
Posted

Not that long ago  talking about aliens would get you labeled as a nut case conspiracy theorist,and told to put on your tinfoil hat.

Now it's highly fashionable all the rage and cool.

 

Not that sending a craft to Mars is not cool, It is.

 

However I'm very confused that they had the technology to send men to the moon 50+ years ago,but somehow all that technology got lost

and they have to reinvent the wheel to get there again.

Posted
2 hours ago, johng said:

Not that long ago  talking about aliens would get you labeled as a nut case conspiracy theorist,and told to put on your tinfoil hat.

Now it's highly fashionable all the rage and cool.

 

Not that sending a craft to Mars is not cool, It is.

 

However I'm very confused that they had the technology to send men to the moon 50+ years ago,but somehow all that technology got lost

and they have to reinvent the wheel to get there again.

 I think many people were/are confused. A few years ago one NASA flight controller made some comparisons. He argued that when a car is relaced by the next version why does it take years to get the new verson on the road when the new version may already have 90% of the older model's characteristics? He made the same comparison with aircraft. He argued that using newer technology means more precision which the aged systems might not be able to accommodate. Therefore, it means starting from scratch with the new tecnology. That is, testing the new technology with unmanned launches first.

Others have argued that the old molds atc. were destroyed to make way for different programs and building new infrastructure.

I am not an engineer or machine designer so I just take their word for it.

Well, whatever the reason they'd better get 'move on' because I read today that the asteroid that had a 3.1% of hitting Earth in 2032 (but now less chance) has a bigger chance of hitting the moon. 🙂 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...