21 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

LOL.... that's what the board of directors is tasked with.... making decisions, especially if, as you say, they had the support of the shareholders....

And their positions – and returns on investment – depend on results… but the AI-centric model is not delivering. I have spoken to some of these people personally and the situation is dire (as some of of us had long anticipated). The problem is that the stakeholders and decision-makers refused to listen – for various reasons which will have to be analysed in hindsight – when told that this AI-centric model was but a pipe dream.

Just google 'AI bubble' and read the plethora of recent articles by the likes of Time or Forbes, if you are interested in knowing more about this impending disaster. I'm not making anything up.

one leaked photage from Nasa

17 hours ago, kwilco said:

read "Bad Science" by Ben Goldacre

For truth, better to read Anti-nature and Junk Science posts by Stiddle Mump.

Available on AN and TT.

2 hours ago, Hummin said:

one leaked photage from Nasa

Alien egg. Being taken to the Pentagon.

2 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Alien egg. Being taken to the Pentagon.

Also my thought. Because if it were the Sun, the truck would melt…

It's good when we brainstorm to parse fact from fiction.

A little bit fiction in the morning

On 4/19/2025 at 9:20 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Not so Sir. 150+ years of compromised quackery more like.

 

I'm not saying there have not been some medical advances. But lobotomy, blood-letting, injecting mercury and aluminum into the body, are not advances of any description in my book.

 

A virus - any virus - has never been isolated.

 

Are you writing from the past?

8 minutes ago, Issan girl said:

Are you writing from the past?

No Madam. I'm bang up to date.

Fully aware of the falsehoods, pseudo-science, and anti-nature words that are constantly spouted from the Big Pharma compromised mouths.

Mums and Dad! Beware those white-coats spouting 'safe n effective'. Take yer babe back home and do some research. Don't let your precious babe be a lifetime Big Pharma customer.

Nature rules. We are nature. Nature is us.

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

No Madam. I'm bang up to date.

Fully aware of the falsehoods, pseudo-science, and anti-nature words that are constantly spouted from the Big Pharma compromised mouths.

Mums and Dad! Beware those white-coats spouting 'safe n effective'. Take yer babe back home and do some research. Don't let your precious babe be a lifetime Big Pharma customer.

Nature rules. We are nature. Nature is us.

True words spoken there, Stiddle.

8 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Nature rules. We are nature. Nature is us

So let's all go back to being "bang up to date" when nature ruled – the average lifespan was 40 years – and that was before any industrial farming or medicines...

6 hours ago, kwilco said:

So let's all go back to being "bang up to date" when nature ruled – the average lifespan was 40 years – and that was before any industrial farming or medicines...

You just don't get it Sir. You are not alone.

Can't you see that nature is everything? Destroy it, and we destroy ourselves. Making filth in labs and injecting it into babes is anti-nature and pseudo-science. Quackery in fact. Any why? To make money for Big Pharma and keep the know-nothing white-coats' bank accounts healthy. Healthy!? What about keeping the people healthy? What! No profit in that is there! Wouldn't want to disrupt our 'health' industry; would we?

In my lifetime, people have lived to 120+ years old. And both men and women sexually active well past 100.

Nature rules OK!

6 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

You just don't get it Sir. You are not alone.

Can't you see that nature is everything? Destroy it, and we destroy ourselves. Making filth in labs and injecting it into babes is anti-nature and pseudo-science. Quackery in fact. Any why? To make money for Big Pharma and keep the know-nothing white-coats' bank accounts healthy. Healthy!? What about keeping the people healthy? What! No profit in that is there! Wouldn't want to disrupt our 'health' industry; would we?

In my lifetime, people have lived to 120+ years old. And both men and women sexually active well past 100.

Nature rules OK!

well, one thing's clear, it's done a pretty good job on you...BTW what is NOT nature?

"In my lifetime, people have lived to 120+ years old.' - really and when were you alive?

22 hours ago, Issan girl said:

Are you writing from the past?

"What exactly is wrong with telling the truth?" Magdalene investigates.

https://www.informedparent.co.uk

39 minutes ago, kwilco said:

well, one thing's clear, it's done a pretty good job on you...BTW what is NOT nature?

"In my lifetime, people have lived to 120+ years old.' - really and when were you alive?

These people live, and work, on the land. They do not take any Big Pharma drugs. The eat natural food. Their crops are not tainted by chemicals.

They live in smaller communities. Houses built with natural materials. Drink pure, fresh untreated water.

All documented in an earlier topic by Stiddle on AN. Go take a look and learn something.

44 minutes ago, kwilco said:

BTW what is NOT nature?

The toxic filth being concocted in labs, grown in petri dishes, put into syringes, and pumped into babes and toddlers.

21 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

True words spoken there, Stiddle.

Are you following Artemis 2 - might help you work out if such things are possible now and then.

20 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Are you following Artemis 2 - might help you work out if such things are possible now and then.

Don't waste your time. Everyone knows the earth is flat.

As it was in 1969.

27 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Are you following Artemis 2 - might help you work out if such things are possible now and then.

They are gonna get rumbled for sure.

27 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Are you following Artemis 2 - might help you work out if such things are possible now and then.

As I said a couple of times before, I note the cast is more diverse for the remake. We'll see if it is well received by viewers and critics.

On 3/28/2026 at 4:59 PM, Red Phoenix said:

Thus very akin to pharma-funded research...

not even in the same universe.... 555

I notice conspiracy theorists are being very quiet on the moon-mission threads. nothing more than half-hearted onliners but no serious arguments

Surely there should be evidence for both landing hoaxers and flat earthers – or are they just waiting to be told what to say?

On 3/28/2026 at 9:59 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Thus very akin to pharma-funded research...

Medical research in the UK is primarily funded by a mix of government, charity, and commercial sectors, with medical research charities often contributing the largest share of public-facing funding, accounting for roughly 41-44% of it. Major funders include the Medical Research Council (MRC) (government), large charities like Cancer Research UK, and pharmaceutical companies - you\re not very well-read.

4 hours ago, kwilco said:

I notice conspiracy theorists are being very quiet on the moon-mission threads. nothing more than half-hearted onliners but no serious arguments

Surely there should be evidence for both landing hoaxers and flat earthers – or are they just waiting to be told what to say?

True I'm not a big SF fan. What do you want to know?

44 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

True I'm not a big SF fan. What do you want to know?

What part is the hoax

3 minutes ago, kwilco said:

What part is the hoax

We can start here. Happy to hear your explanation:

30 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

We can start here. Happy to hear your explanation:

No, that's not an explanation – I want YOU to tell everyone where the HOAX STARTS

Go through it step by step

You can't just cherry-pick the odd bit of Google that suits

...and let's get sidetracked – where do they say that?

14 minutes ago, kwilco said:

No, that's not an explanation – I want YOU to tell everyone where the HOAX STARTS

Go through it step by step

You can't just cherry-pick the odd bit of Google that suits

...and let's get sidetracked – where do they say that?

Yeah, I know, it's always a bit of a shock to hear NASA themwelves explain that the Earth pics are fake. Borderline cognitive dissonance material… but let's not let an insurmountable contradiction challenge our beliefs, eh?

Where does the hoax start? In your head. And only you can work on that. Few people are equipped to change their steadfast beliefs.

Like Fox Mulder, you want to believe and no amount of explicit footage will make you change your stance.

39 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Yeah, I know, it's always a bit of a shock to hear NASA themwelves explain that the Earth pics are fake. Borderline cognitive dissonance material… but let's not let an insurmountable contradiction challenge our beliefs, eh?

Where does the hoax start? In your head. And only you can work on that. Few people are equipped to change their steadfast beliefs.

Like Fox Mulder, you want to believe and no amount of explicit footage will make you change your stance.

not impressed – all you are doing is clinging to one piece of dubious crap and hoping it destroys the whole argument.

I said, 'Why don't you show when the hoax starts?' You can't, so you just think you can repeat half-arsed one-liners – you need to put forward a derailed explanation in your own words – I'm starting to think you can't.

The moonshots – both US and Chinese – are wonderful opportunities for flat earthers and hoax believers to put forward their case – but they – including yourself – are being remarkably taciturn. - I can't help but get a frisson of schadenfreude from this.

42 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Few people are equipped to change their steadfast beliefs.

QED! – You realise that by definition, science doesn't have steadfast beliefs?

17 minutes ago, kwilco said:

QED! – You realise that by definition, science doesn't have steadfast beliefs?

Yes it does. From the Wikipedia page on vaccination, for example (you will, of course, retort that these are "facts", de facto admitting that it's okay to have a steadfast belief it it falls in the "fact" category):

Vaccination has saved 154 million lives, 95% of whom are children younger than five years of age.

Some parents believe vaccinations cause autism, although there is no scientific evidence to support this idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccination

No amount of data challenging these dogmas will be even considered by their proponents, ergo said proponents are believers.

25 minutes ago, kwilco said:

The moonshots – both US and Chinese – are wonderful opportunities for flat earthers and hoax believers to put forward their case – but they – including yourself – are being remarkably taciturn.

My time is incredibly precious and therefore I don't engage in repetition; read through the Is Earth round or flat and Exposing the Apollo moon landings as a hoax - Bart Sibrel threads, it's all there. I might have specific things to say regarding the remake Artemis II once more information emerges and/or I have taken the time to do a deep dive on it, but unfortunately that will have to wait for now.

29 minutes ago, kwilco said:

I can't help but get a frisson of schadenfreude from this.

If you feel happy then that's great, and I mean that very sincerely.