Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Prof Dr Vinay PRASAD provides 5 reasons why the upcoming Fall Covid-19 booster should be approved on the basis of clinical trials before the roll-out

image.png.bcd8d11361bbf03097735d7258cdd4b8.png

Source: https://www.drvinayprasad.com/p/5-reasons-why-the-covid-19-vaccine 

 

= = = 

Prasad wrote > I couldn’t help but notice that the mainstream media is upset that going forward the fall COVID 19 booster might require randomized trials measuring clinical endpoints, rather than allowing Peter Marks to pick a variant target (based on an analogy to him buying milk) and then generate antibodies against the target. Helen Branswell from Stat, however, says that trials are not feasible. 

Is this true? Here are 5 reasons why COVID-19 shots should require trials.

fc30ebfd-8235-4887-8250-abe330532931_2252x508.webp.b665934762008ca471a9c41da083a14e.webp

ce071662-ee30-4329-a8a2-8f229dd95414_1480x374.webp.95fe1877395c1d7bb07987739b4e68c5.webp

In the article he then provides 5 reasons why such clinical trials should be done before roll-out.

See article > https://www.drvinayprasad.com/p/5-reasons-why-the-covid-19-vaccine 

 

Prasad concludes:

Folks who think COVID-19 vaccines should continue to roll out without randomized trials are anti-vaccine, anti-science, and pro-corporate.

 

Prasad's fifth reason reads

Without trials, it is only a matter of time before the FDA approves a vaccine that causes some bad outcome like vaccine-induced narcolepsy If this happens, you can kiss faith in vaccines goodbye. You will see vaccine hesitancy like you have never seen before. The FDA must have a strong commitment to safety and efficacy to preserve vaccine’s remaining reputation.

 

= = =

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

So one of Vina Prasad's main arguments is that without a trustworthy FDA approval process (which eventually will result in 'bad jabs' being rolled-out), that the remaining trust in vaccines would be even further eroded. 

Obviously he is very right on that one.  

But my take on this is that if it takes MORE adverse effects of the Covid-jabs to open people's eyes, then bring it on WITHOUT any serious clinical trials, just like the FDA did for the covid-boosters. 

Freedom of choice...

At this point in time, It would only be the Vax-cultists that would go for their x-th Covid-booster and voluntarily become human guinea-pigs for the shots.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...