Prince Harry The Interview: Sends Shockwaves Through Royal Circles

[Social Media]

 

Prince Harry’s latest BBC interview has struck a deeply emotional chord and could be remembered as one of the defining moments in the ongoing drama between him and the British Royal Family. What began as a discussion about legal battles over security swiftly transformed into a highly personal revelation—a torrent of long-held frustrations and sorrow pouring out in real time.

 

 

The conversation opened with Harry addressing his recent legal defeat concerning the downgrading of his UK security status. He appeared visibly shaken by the ruling, and the conversation quickly took a far more intimate turn. His words carried a raw emotional weight, revealing the deep fracture in his relationship with his father. “He won’t speak to me because of this security stuff,” Prince Harry said, his voice heavy with hurt. He added a haunting reflection: he doesn’t know “how much longer my father has,” an admission that laid bare the emotional cost of their estrangement.

 

This wasn’t just a comment on legal proceedings—it was a window into the royal family’s internal disarray. The prince’s anguish over his children’s lack of connection with their relatives in the UK was palpable. He described himself as “gutted” and “devastated,” lamenting that his visits to Britain now revolve only around “funerals and court cases.”

 

There was a sense of someone caught between wanting to be heard and wanting reconciliation. Prince Harry didn’t hold back, suggesting that his reduced security arrangements were not just a bureaucratic decision but part of a deeper family rift. He implied that the Royal Household may have played a role in influencing the decision, using security as a means of control. But for all his grievances, he extended a heartfelt call for peace. “There’s no point continuing to fight any more. Life is precious,” he said, offering what felt like a grand gesture of reconciliation.

 

Still, he made clear that the “sticking point” in any potential reconciliation remains his security status when in the UK. He appealed not just to King Charles, but also to the Prime Minister and Home Secretary, in an effort to find resolution.

 

Yet the courts remain unmoved. Sir Geoffrey Vos, the judge who ruled against him, stated that Prince Harry’s “sense of grievance” could not substitute for a legal argument. The decision was upheld on the basis that Harry’s circumstances had changed—he was no longer a working royal and did not reside in the UK.

 

Buckingham Palace responded with a tone of fatigue, almost parental in its exasperation. “All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.” The Palace hinted that the King could not interfere with matters under judicial or governmental review.

 

The Home Office echoed satisfaction with the court’s decision, saying the UK’s security system is “rigorous and proportionate.”

 

Meanwhile, the public and the media will likely continue replaying Harry’s vulnerable moments. His emotional honesty, laid bare for the world to see, will leave an indelible mark. At a time when the Royal Family prepares to take part in solemn VE Day 80 commemorations, Harry’s accusations and confessions will still be fresh in the public consciousness. It raises a complex question: how can the monarchy present a united front to the world while these very public fractures remain unresolved?

 

Prince Harry’s candid reflections left a powerful impression. As he looks back toward a homeland that feels both familiar and foreign, the real question may be how that homeland—and his family—will look back at him.

 

  Adpated by ASEAN Now from BBC  2025-05-04

 

 

[daveAustin]

What a pathetic little spoiled brat. Not a royalist by any stretch, but this pair (him and his Wallis Simpson woman) are too much. You bad mouthed them, walked out and moved overseas. Alright, the financial thing is on the Crown Estate so it’s not taxpayer’s money, but why should anybody pay for your protection? People harp on about his ‘front line’ experience in Afghanistan etc, but this guy is not a war veteran… surrounded by marines the whole time as he was. His brother and old man are decent folk and help ordinary people left and right, while Harry (Henry) is all about Harry (Henry), inching towards loser dweeb territory. Grow up, grow a pair and move on!

[Harrisfan]

No way Charles is his dad.

[Yagoda]

Harry is Pussywhipped

[Gsxrnz]

The House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha has become a rather boring B-grade TV reality show. 

[lamyai3]

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

No way Charles is his dad.

There was a time when he looked like Hewitt, but as he gets older he's turning into a spitting image of the Duke of Edinburgh. 

[BangkokReady]

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

Prince Harry’s latest BBC interview has struck a deeply emotional chord and could be remembered as one of the defining moments in the ongoing drama between him and the British Royal Family.

 

Nope.  Nobody cares.

[BangkokReady]

2 hours ago, daveAustin said:

What a pathetic little spoiled brat. Not a royalist by any stretch, but this pair (him and his Wallis Simpson woman) are too much. You bad mouthed them, walked out and moved overseas. Alright, the financial thing is on the Crown Estate so it’s not taxpayer’s money, but why should anybody pay for your protection?

 

Yeah, it's weird to think that he's anti-Royalty, while wanting free money for being Royalty.

 

2 hours ago, daveAustin said:

People harp on about his ‘front line’ experience in Afghanistan etc, but this guy is not a war veteran… surrounded by marines the whole time as he was.

 

He was clearly safely away from the conflict, protected by a gang of Ghurkhas.  He posed for a few photos with some military equipment, before the press conveniently "broke the blackout" so he had to be sent back home.

[newbee2022]

2 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

No way Charles is his dad.

Got a proof?

[giddyup]

16 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Yeah, it's weird to think that he's anti-Royalty, while wanting free money for being Royalty.

 

 

He was clearly safely away from the conflict, protected by a gang of Ghurkhas.  He posed for a few photos with some military equipment, before the press conveniently "broke the blackout" so he had to be sent back home.

What about all the Taliban he supposedly killed?

[metisdead]

Some bickering troll posts and replies have been removed.

[BangkokReady]

6 minutes ago, giddyup said:

What about all the Taliban he supposedly killed?

 

"The prince recounts in his memoir his time as a gunner in an Apache attack helicopter while on his second tour in Afghanistan in 2012."

 

He was chilling in the back of a helicopter.  Doubtful that he was in any danger.

[giddyup]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

"The prince recounts in his memoir his time as a gunner in an Apache attack helicopter while on his second tour in Afghanistan in 2012."

 

He was chilling in the back of a helicopter.  Doubtful that he was in any danger.

In his memoir, the Duke of Sussex describes killing 25 Taliban in six missions as “chess pieces taken off the board”.

[BangkokReady]

4 minutes ago, giddyup said:

In his memoir, the Duke of Sussex describes killing 25 Taliban in six missions as “chess pieces taken off the board”.

 

Yes.  From the safety of a multi-million dollar helicopter.  It's doubtful that he was in any real danger.

[giddyup]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Yes.  From the safety of a multi-million dollar helicopter.  It's doubtful that he was in any real danger.

The Taliban did have RPG's.

[Woke to Sounds]

My heart breaks a little for Hares and Megs.

 

They have tried SO hard just to live a regular life ..... and yet look at the resistance they encounter.

 

Prayers for the both of you   🙏

[2long]

Considering that he has no royal blood, and chose to move away, means that he has no claim to anything.

Actually, how about back-paying all the costs he has incurred since he was born!

[BangkokReady]

5 minutes ago, giddyup said:

The Taliban did have RPG's.

 

Sure, but it seems that the Apache has such range that the chance of anything actually happening to Harry is near zero.  I tried googling, and I couldn't find any clear evidence of an Apache being shot down in Afghanistan.  It seems they were in more danger of crash landing, but I would imagine that the one carrying Harry would have the best pilot and be in the best condition.

 

It seems that the only real danger for Apache helicopters in Afghanistan was human error or running out of fuel.

[Briggsy]

Whining in the media again whilst cleverly simultaneously pretending he is being constructive and also virtue signalling.

 

He really has this St Harry the Victim character off to a tee. I suspect he has become the character.

[theshu25]

He will be welcome back when he gets rid of the Duccess Of Deceipt.

[Jerzy Swirski]

2 hours ago, lamyai3 said:

There was a time when he looked like Hewitt, but as he gets older he's turning into a spitting image of the Duke of Edinburgh. 

Good Lord, I never knew that Phil the Greek was porking Diana. 😀

[alien365]

You reap what you sow. He always wanted to have his cake and eat it. Now he's made his bed, it's time to lie in it.

[Cameroni]

I don't understand the issue with the UK taxpayer no longer paying for his security. He's a miillionaire many times over, why can't Harry pay for his own bodyguards?

 

He goes to court to get others to pay for his bodyguards? How pathetic does that look? 

[RuamRudy]

3 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Nope.  Nobody cares.

There are lots of puce faced men on this thread who will disagree with you. Any time his name is mentioned their blood pressure will testify to that. 

[RuamRudy]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

I don't understand the issue with the UK taxpayer no longer paying for his security. He's a miillionaire many times over, why can't Harry pay for his own bodyguards?

 

He goes to court to get others to pay for his bodyguards? How pathetic does that look? 

 

Agreed, same for his brother, father, aunts and uncles. Let them, for once, pay their own way in life. 

[Photoguy21]

6 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

No way Charles is his dad.

Charles is not the sharpest tack in the box and Harry certainly isn't so I guess Charles is his father.

[JonnyF]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

I don't understand the issue with the UK taxpayer no longer paying for his security. He's a miillionaire many times over, why can't Harry pay for his own bodyguards?

 

He goes to court to get others to pay for his bodyguards? How pathetic does that look? 

 

He actually can still get it.

 

But he has to give 28 days notice and get approval. That's not good enough for Harry, his brother gets it 24/7 so it reminds him of the time William got 2 sausages and he only got 1. He wants it for Rachel's shopping trips, for last minute jaunts to Ascot.

 

So now he is trying to use it to blackmail his father (who is dieing of cancer) by saying he will never see his grandchildren unless he gets it. As if he wouldn't get protection if he told his father he was bringing his wife and children to the UK to see him before he dies. 

 

The guy is a disgrace and should be stripped of his titles and removed from the line of succession immediately. 

 

[JonnyF]

3 hours ago, giddyup said:

In his memoir, the Duke of Sussex describes killing 25 Taliban in six missions as “chess pieces taken off the board”.

 

It's well known that as you shoot down at multiple enemies from a fast moving helicopter several hundred feet up, you keep a tally of exactly how many people you hit and then follow up to see whether they survived their injuries.  

 

It's about as believable as his "near catastrophic" car chase through rush hour Manhattan, during which time reporters walked alongside the car to take pictures of Harry looking annoyed and playing on his phone, sat next to his handlers Rachel and Doria Ragland.

 

 

 

 

[Harrisfan]

7 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Harry is Pussywhipped

I love that move