Another Fox appointee and this one OMG

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

It is interesting to observe when the right (here, on this forum) chooses to play the DEI card or, in this case, not.

How as a 'white woman' is she a dei pick 

[impulse]

17 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

How as a 'white woman' is she a dei pick 

 

I had to look it up.  She's of Lebanese decent.

 

 

[frank83628]

4 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

I had to look it up.  She's of Lebanese decent.

 

 

Does that count?

I thought it had to be lgb or a tranny, black with diabilities (for added bonus)

[Gottfrid]

17 hours ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

That's why the shallow thinking bedwetters on the left don't like her 

 

 

 

 

So, are you trying to say that lefties stand positive to sex offenders, child predators and other forms of abuse? Be careful, we are in Thailand. Such kind of talk falls under Thailands strict defamation laws. So does calling a group of people bedwetters. If you don´t have proof of both, that will say. Please, show you proof.

[bamnutsak]

The only people required to judge her qualifications are the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate.

 

If you think she's qualified, then nominate her, advance her nomination, hold hearings, and vote up or down.

 

But she has NOT been nominated - rather she has been appointed to a temporary four-month "term" - which tells everyone that she could not be confirmed and therefore is not qualified.

 

Women are often referred to here as "DEI" hires, at least when people wish to marginalize and denigrate their positions.

 

[frank83628]

6 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

So, are you trying to say that lefties stand positive to sex offenders, child predators and other forms of abuse? Be careful, we are in Thailand. Such kind of talk falls under Thailands strict defamation laws. So does calling a group of people bedwetters. If you don´t have proof of both, that will say. Please, show you proof.

I'd like to see how far someone would get with a defamation case as a foreigner, based off a forums where members are using anonymous profiles.

You have to defame someone personally, using the term bed wetter and lefites will not get far. someone try please.

[Tug]

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us how Judge DiPirro is not qualified to be a prosecutor?

Tell me how Kamala Harris was unqualified to be a DA and the AG for California…..not to mention a senator and Vice President……Jennie is a harridan spouting lies and nonsense on fake news fox when she isent in her cups.but hey she’d fit rite in with the clown cabinet……I don’t think she stands a chance anyway just to toxic and a drunk.

[Yagoda]

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Jennie is a harridan spouting lies and nonsense on fake news fox

What lies and nonsense did she spout on the highest rated program?

 

Harridan? Typical misogyny of the left.

[Tug]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

What lies and nonsense did she spout on the highest rated program?

 

Harridan? Typical misogyny of the left.

I’ve never watch fake Fox News I do remember her calling democrats demonrats lol sounds just the kind of person ya want sitting on the bench ehh??rember yagoda justice is supposed to be blind…..and she’s a drunk

[JAG]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Huh? You have little understanding of how the adversary justice system works.

 

Would you rather the Judge skew everything for the Gov?

 

 

I have a very clear understanding of how the adversarial justice system works. In my understanding, which forms the basis of my post, the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. 

 

Somewhat different to the process you describe and enthuse over.

[Yagoda]

14 minutes ago, Tug said:

I’ve never watch fake Fox News I do remember her calling democrats demonrats lol sounds just the kind of person ya want sitting on the bench ehh??rember yagoda justice is supposed to be blind…..and she’s a drunk

If you never watch fake Fox news, the highest rated network, how do you know about "demonrats"?

[Yagoda]

33 minutes ago, JAG said:

I have a very clear understanding of how the adversarial justice system works. In my understanding, which forms the basis of my post, the Judge is supposed to administer the process fairly, according to the law, and give no licence to either side, nor conduct a trial with the prepared intention of "slapping on" the maximum sentence. 

 

Somewhat different to the process you describe and enthuse over.

You have never done it, and know not of what you speak. Especially when it comes to rules of evidence, leeway in cross examination, statues of limitations, jury charges, prosecutorial overreach, etc

 

Sort of like how that Judge in NYC skewed the case against Trump.

 

But folks are innocent till proven guilty and thus a judge that favours the defense in rulings is not prejudicing the government, he is protecting the innocent.

 

The Judge knows all the evidence, the only person that does. He knows about the 10 other killings done almost the same way, now he needs to decide whether the trier of fact will know too.

 

Enthuse over? The criminal defense lawyer is liberty's last champion. Thank god for Judges that will let them defend their clients.

 

PS. You know why Kash is going to make a great FBI director? Because he was a Federal Public Defender and he knows how the FBI and govt roll.