Politics Election Commission Struggles with Goals on Thailand's Political Reform

[snoop1130]

File photo for reference only

 

On its 27th anniversary, Thailand's Election Commission (EC) acknowledged its ongoing struggle to achieve significant political reform, as announced by EC Secretary-General Sawaeng Boonmee. Despite receiving comprehensive cooperation from government bodies, the private sector, and the media, the EC's objectives remain unmet, according to Sawaeng.

 

Reflecting on the nation’s evolving political landscape, Sawaeng noted that three of Thailand's constitutions—in 1997, 2007, and 2017—have emphasized political reform, a goal still not fully realized despite being enshrined in the constitution. He contended that political reform isn't solely within the EC's purview and requires more than just institutional effort.

 

"We cannot succeed because good politics requires good citizens, not just the EC. We are merely an intermediary in this process," Sawaeng remarked, emphasizing the importance of an engaged citizenry for real change.

 

He outlined three primary areas vital for cultivating a healthy political environment. The first involves nurturing citizens capable of thriving in a democratic system under the monarchy. Citizen development, according to Sawaeng, is essential in aligning public behavior with the political vision.

 

The second area focuses on supporting and enhancing political parties. The EC aims to collaborate with these entities to fortify their capacity in promoting political betterment across the nation.

 

Lastly, Sawaeng touched on election management, underscoring the transparency inherent in Thailand's electoral processes despite any administrative challenges that may arise.

 

In summary, while the EC remains committed to its role as a facilitator, Mr. Sawaeng’s reflections make it clear that sustainable political reform in Thailand requires a collective effort involving informed citizens, proactive political parties, and collaborative governance. As Thailand continues to navigate its political journey, the role of individuals and institutions working together remains pivotal in shaping future outcomes.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Bangkok Post 2025-06-10

 

 

[ikke1959]

The EC is too much involved in the processes before, during and after the elections.. It should be an institution that prepares the election, and after the elections took place they should stop with working.. But in Thailand they keep on going and as long as you stir in a poo the harder it will stink...And indeed they are an intermediary. And good politicians and people must be screened correctly instead of now a lot of corrupt, and incompetent people in power, but that is the EC now, probably done because of bribes. Get rid of these people as soon as possible 

[newbee2022]

14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Reflecting on the nation’s evolving political landscape,

What does it mean?

More oligarchy, more autoritatism, more grafting, more cheating...?

Confused