Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Better to use a foreign credit card (one with no foreign transaction fee) for as much as you can and only bring in funds when necessary. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Better to use a foreign credit card (one with no foreign transaction fee) for as much as you can and only bring in funds when necessary. 

I think you meant debit card.... not credit card.  The OP mentioned ATM card which is usually not a credit card.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Probably no difference, both methods COULD be considered as "remitted funds/income".

 

That said if the funds were "earned" prior to 2024, or (maybe, as "proposed") earned in 2025 and remitted in 2025 or 2026, they might be exempt.

 

If you need the funds transfer them, if you're worried about tax implication, spend fewer than 180 days in Thailand.

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, gamb00ler said:

I think you meant debit card.... not credit card.  The OP mentioned ATM card which is usually not a credit card.

Yes true,debit card.

Posted
2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I think you meant debit card.... not credit card.  The OP mentioned ATM card which is usually not a credit card.

Nope. I meant credit card. Plus you can get a percent or two back from the credit card co. And you're protected much more than using an ATM card. Clearly doesn't work for people that want to use cash for everything though. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Nope. I meant credit card. Plus you can get a percent or two back from the credit card co. And you're protected much more than using an ATM card. Clearly doesn't work for people that want to use cash for everything though. 

I haven’t read so many examples of the terms and conditions regarding credit card use but those I have read don’t give any cash back on cash advances.  Instead they charge an immediate fee for the service and also a high ongoing interest rate.  I don’t research the credit cards with a high annual fee so perhaps one of those will offer better terms for cash advances.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

I haven’t read so many examples of the terms and conditions regarding credit card use but those I have read don’t give any cash back on cash advances.  Instead they charge an immediate fee for the service and also a high ongoing interest rate.  I don’t research the credit cards with a high annual fee so perhaps one of those will offer better terms for cash advances.

I wasn't saying to use your foreign credit card for cash advances. I use the CC everywhere I can including groceries, liquor, shopee. etc. My reading of the OP is that he was trying to minimize tax liability. This is the best way I've come up with so far.

Posted
23 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

Some people have been adamant that credit card use could also be viewed as "remitted funds".

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1322926-remit-vs-credit-card-payment-under-new-tax-rules/

 

 

In theory it should be otherwise it leaves a 'gaping' loophole.......In the UK for non-doms it is covered under HMRC guidance as taxable for example.

 

12 minutes ago, gargamon said:

Good luck to them trying to track it.

I don't disagree with that.

The only issue potentially would arise if audited and asked to prove how you lived and bought stuff but unless other reasons for being targeted it seems very unlikely.

Posted

Debit/ATM pulls with your foreign cards are sucking cash from your home country financial account. This account is probably a co-mingle of funds -- some assessable if remitted; some not. How to differentiate what's what is a problem, tho' using FIFO might help, if your financial acct has some pre 2024 funds in it. Same problem with a SWIFT or WISE transfer.

 

Now, say you want to buy a car in Thailand, so you borrow the money from your home country bank, and then remit it to Thailand. Would this remittance be taxable income? Of course not -- and such self - assessment would be included in doing my Thai taxes.

 

So, you use your foreign credit card to pay for a meal in a Thai restaurant. Now, this money is not a direct suck from you home country financial account; it's a loan from your credit card bank, same as that loan I took out to buy a car in Thailand. So, why would I treat this cash flow as remitted income to Thailand? Of course, I wouldn't.

 

Now, in that referenced link above, from bamnutsak -- here's what Mike Lister said:

Quote

Regardless, using a foreign credit card in Thailand to make payments here, is still considered to be remitted funds.

 

Yes, remitted funds. But NOT remitted assessable income, which is the point he was trying to drive home. Fortunately, Mike Lister and his bad advice have left this forum. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JimGant said:

Fortunately, Mike Lister and his bad advice have left this forum. 

Probably just changed his handle, like most of the other irritants do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...