Popular Post Social Media Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM Popular Post Posted yesterday at 09:00 PM Stephen Fry and the Cultural Elite’s Contempt for Dissenting Women Stephen Fry’s recent comments about JK Rowling have added yet another voice to the chorus of celebrities condemning the author over her views on sex and gender. Speaking on The Show People podcast, Fry remarked that Rowling “seems to be a lost cause for us,” accusing her of making comments that are “inflammatory and contemptuous, mocking and add to a terribly distressing time for trans people.” He even went so far as to claim that she had “been radicalised by TERFs” — a slur often used against feminists who assert the importance of biological sex. It’s not the first time Fry has taken aim at Rowling. In 2022, on another podcast, he attempted a more diplomatic approach, calling Rowling a friend while lamenting that his “trans friends and intersex friends” were “deeply upset by her.” He suggested a truce of sorts, calling on Rowling and trans activists to “retreat” and consider that both trans people and women should be able to live full lives with dignity. That request, couched in civility, failed to mask the underlying presumption: that Rowling’s concerns should be shelved to preserve the comfort of his social circle. Fry’s misunderstanding of the political and cultural stakes in the so-called “gender wars” is telling. This is not about table manners or polite disagreement; it’s about rights, definitions, and material realities. The notion that Rowling is simply stirring controversy for its own sake ignores the substance of her arguments — arguments rooted in longstanding feminist thought and, as recently affirmed by the UK Supreme Court, biological fact. Perhaps Fry’s renewed criticism was prompted by that very ruling, which defined “woman” in biological terms, a victory Rowling celebrated publicly. Her celebratory mood — champagne and cigars — may have rankled Fry. Some men, after all, don’t like to see women win arguments, especially when they defy the expectations of their cultural class. Fry’s desire for Rowling to “retreat” is not just misguided — it’s a reflection of the cultural elite’s impulse to control who gets to speak and how. He himself has faced criticism in the past, including a 2023 scandal involving off-color jokes about women and Muslim terrorists. One might think that someone who has tasted the wrath of the outrage machine would be more cautious about demanding silence from others. Instead, Fry now appears eager to stay in the good graces of a new cultural establishment — one that prizes ideological conformity over open debate. His image as a modern Oscar Wilde rings hollow when paired with such cowardice. At best, his remarks betray a shallow understanding of what Rowling actually says. At worst, they represent a willful attempt to isolate her for refusing to submit to the social orthodoxy of the moment. Most revealing was Fry’s complaint that Rowling fails to show “love” to trans people. “You have to let people love you,” he said, arguing that to be labeled “transphobe” over mere disagreement is counterproductive. But demanding “love” from political opponents is not only unrealistic — it’s also a tactic used to shame women into silence. It reframes principled disagreement as a failure of etiquette or kindness. What Fry and others seem to want is not genuine dialogue, but docility. They want women like Rowling to defer, apologise, and recede. When they refuse, it is framed as cruelty or bigotry. But women have every right to defend their boundaries, their spaces, and their vocabulary. They don’t need love — they need freedom, dignity, and respect. If that’s too much for Fry and others to stomach, then so be it. JK Rowling has endured years of criticism from powerful figures, but she remains undeterred. She is used to being told to be quiet. And, thankfully, she continues to speak anyway. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-06-21 3 1
Popular Post BusyB Posted 11 hours ago Popular Post Posted 11 hours ago 13 hours ago, Social Media said: Some men, after all, don’t like to see women win arguments, especially when they defy the expectations of their cultural class. Stephen Fry is definitely not that type of man even if he's having a spat with JK. AN threads however are bursting with those types. 1 1 1 1
VocalNeal Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago If I hadn't been born a bloke I may have been a TERF. Hold 'em up smack their bum. Dangly bits or not. Sorted. 2S is OK. Native First Nations have recognised them for centuries. Blokes winning at Women's swimming. No.
Crossy Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago A comment on moderation has been removed per the forum rules. "I don't want to know why you can't. I want to know how you can!"
Yagoda Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: She wrote bs books Who cares about her opinion Which she is entitled to, like the mentally ill screech crowd that claims that a man can become a woman by saying so. 3 1
Harrisfan Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Which she is entitled to, like the mentally ill screech crowd that claims that a man can become a woman by saying so. People can think what they want and say what they want. She's ugly and trans are weird. Freedom of speech. 1
Yagoda Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: People can think what they want and say what they want. She's ugly and trans are weird. Freedom of speech. Exactly. But to some folks, Freedom of Speech only applies to those words approved by the Socialists. 1 1 2
hotsun Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: People can think what they want and say what they want. She's ugly and trans are weird. Freedom of speech. I think shes hot and im getting my kids into harry potter not disney 2
TedG Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago We have a man telling a woman what a woman is. Sounds like mansplaning. 1 1
Elkski Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 13 minutes ago, hotsun said: I think shes hot and im getting my kids into harry potter not disney Maybe in 1997. I just don't know what to think but I really don't enjoy seeing LB when I'm in town. But I also don't like seeing obese people with purple hair and people with tats all over. Especially head and face tats. I don't really like body alterations including masses of silicone, nose jobs and puffy lips. But maybe I need to do something with my turkey neck and drooping eyelids. 1
Social Media Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago @BLMFem your post was removed, any more of that and you will get more than a public mod post warning 17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW. If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly. 1
0ffshore360 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 46 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Which she is entitled to, like the mentally ill screech crowd that claims that a man can become a woman by saying so. Questionable declaration !
0ffshore360 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago As much as Fry has added to the spectrum of British humour it is a bit sad to see him now trying to retain relevance as an ardent defender of gay chauvinism ! At least Laurie moved on and away ! 1 hour ago, Harrisfan said: She wrote bs books Who cares about her opinion And yours ? 1
cdemundo Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 1 hour ago, Harrisfan said: She wrote bs books Who cares about her opinion Chldish envy for a talented writer who wrote one of the most successful fictional series since printing began. If people disagree with her opinions it does not detract from her writing. 2
Yagoda Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 8 minutes ago, 0ffshore360 said: Questionable declaration ! If you believe that men can become women by saying so, then you dont live in reality. 1
Yagoda Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago Just now, cdemundo said: Chldish envy for a talented writer who wrote one of the most successful fictional series since printing began. If people disagree with her opinions it does not detract from her writing. Writing books requires a certain level of intelligence not possesed folks who believe that the moon is made of green cheese or that men can become women by clicking ones heels three times
0ffshore360 Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Yagoda said: If you believe that men can become women by saying so, then you dont live in reality. If you believe I stated that I know who has a better grasp on reality ! 1
bubblegum Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 28 minutes ago, Yagoda said: Writing books requires a certain level of intelligence not possesed folks who believe that the moon is made of green cheese or that men can become women by clicking ones heels three times So true! The moon made of green cheese, ridiculous everybody knows the moon is made of Emmentaler ! The heels clicking I don't get, Hitlers boys only clicked ones per allocated time, did they not?
Andre0720 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago If one considers that the first part of (LGBTQIA+): Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual, which is Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, as a sexual preference stemming more from DNA, something that people are born with, then the addition that other groups try to add, TQIA+, to benefit from its already accepted social view of LGB. Principally because this addition include groups that might be considered as stemming from a 'mental disorder', or from the influence coming from left wing propaganda, then their position is that these two groups should be looked at separately. LGB, hopefully accepted in many societies, not all of course, amalgamated with mental conditions... Some LGB groups have already dissociated with the other groups that are trying to get added acceptance by tagging along.. The more the added groups (TQIA+,) make noise, the more it will give rise to TERF. SHHHHHHHHHHH
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, hotsun said: I think shes hot and im getting my kids into harry potter not disney I hate those books and movies 1
GanDoonToonPet Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago Another one disappeared down the rabbit hole. Maybe he can party with DeGrasse Tyson while he's down there.
RayC Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Yagoda said: Exactly. But to some folks, Freedom of Speech only applies to those words approved by the Socialists. And equally there are those on the right who feel that only their voice should be heard. 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, cdemundo said: Chldish envy for a talented writer who wrote one of the most successful fictional series since printing began. If people disagree with her opinions it does not detract from her writing. Childish post from a lefty. Just because Madonna was successful doesn't mean everyone has to like her music. Same same moron. 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Yagoda said: Writing books requires a certain level of intelligence not possesed folks who believe that the moon is made of green cheese or that men can become women by clicking ones heels three times Talented but it's all bs and kid stuff magic. Not my cup of tea. People can like whatever they want. U2 is super successful but some think they are crap. 1
Harrisfan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, 0ffshore360 said: As much as Fry has added to the spectrum of British humour it is a bit sad to see him now trying to retain relevance as an ardent defender of gay chauvinism ! At least Laurie moved on and away ! And yours ? Fry is washed up. 1
Yagoda Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 57 minutes ago, bubblegum said: Hitlers boys only clicked ones per allocated time, did they not? Oh? You have read The Pink Swastika?
Yagoda Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Harrisfan said: Talented but it's all bs and kid stuff magic. Not my cup of tea. Shes not Tolkien or Pynchon, but any author that can get todays idiot youth to read is a good influence on the world. 1
Yagoda Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 45 minutes ago, RayC said: And equally there are those on the right who feel that only their voice should be heard. Who with governmental power? Name names and events.
JonnyF Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Fry is a bumbling old fool who was never even funny. He was the only one on BlackAdder who managed to turn hilarious lines into cringey moments. An untalented luvvie bore following the Woke dogma. Do one, Stephen.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now