Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

APTOPIX_Thailand_Earthquake_36131_c0-162-3601-2261_s885x516.png

File photo for reference only

 

Thai investigators have determined that design and construction flaws led to the collapse of a partially built Bangkok building during the March 28 earthquake, resulting in at least 89 deaths. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra announced these findings, highlighting that the disaster was not due to material quality.

 

A comprehensive investigation by the Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, alongside Chulalongkorn, Kasetsart, and King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, revealed that critical structures like the elevator and stairwell walls were improperly designed and constructed. These were meant to absorb shear force during seismic events.

 

Contrary to earlier reports suggesting substandard materials, the study confirmed that the steel and concrete used met necessary standards. The issue lay in construction methods that didn't adhere to engineering principles, particularly the elevator shaft wall.

 

The collapsed 30-storey structure, intended for the State Audit Office, was the only building in Bangkok to fall during the 7.7-magnitude quake centred in Myanmar. Authorities have charged a prominent construction tycoon and others with negligence related to the incident.

 

The project was handled by ITD-CREC, a joint venture of Italian-Thai Development Plc and China Railway Number 10 Thailand Co., which secured a 2.14 billion baht contract in 2020. Construction started later that year.

 

Premchai Karnasuta, the president of Italian-Thai Development Plc, along with other executives, designers, and engineers, have been summoned following arrest warrants. Prime Minister Paetongtarn indicated that a fact-finding report will be sent to the Department of Special Investigation and Royal Thai Police for further measures.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Bangkok Post 2025-06-30

 

image.png

 

image.png

Posted

And Pigs will fly !! utter rubbish  Who designed it  who approved the design   Again typical Thailand sweep it under the carpet    

  • Agree 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Who designed it  who approved the design   Again typical Thailand sweep it under the carpet    

I've lost track now, which is probably the ambition of all involved.

I thought it was designed by a credible international firm, could be wrong though.

 

The article appears to throw more emphasis on poor construction, rather than design. 

Posted

Don't want to upset the Chinese masters about their inferior steel reinforcement what a joke

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...