Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Gender Rule Showdown: Legal Clash over Schools and Prisons

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

What nonsense ?
 

Are you another one that wants to go and argue with the ruling of the UK Supreme Court ?
 

A Harvard magazine has no standing in the UK, the Supreme Court does.

 

Try engaging single brain cell, before rattling keyboard, and making an arse of yourself.

The Supreme Court cannot change science. I expect there to be more about this issue in the courts in the future.

  • Replies 122
  • Views 8.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • One in a million is not that many. And you want us all to live our lives pandering to that group?   Didn't you write a book about it?

  • People may have more male or female characteristics.    But they are either biologically male or biologically female.    Just because a bloke likes wearing a dress and lipstick doe

  • The Cyclist
    The Cyclist

    A Tinder chart  

Posted Images

1 minute ago, youreavinalaff said:

The Supreme Court cannot change science. I expect there to be more about this issue in the courts in the future.

 

The Supreme Court is not trying to change science.

 

It made a ruling on the definition of the word " Sex " as applied in the equality Act 2010.

 

The SC ruling said.

 

" Sex " refers to biological sex, not " Gender Identity "

3 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

The Supreme Court is not trying to change science.

 

It made a ruling on the definition of the word " Sex " as applied in the equality Act 2010.

 

The SC ruling said.

 

" Sex " refers to biological sex, not " Gender Identity "

Science suggests otherwise.

 

Like I said, I expect more cases in the courts in the future. 

15 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

What nonsense ?
 

Are you another one that wants to go and argue with the ruling of the UK Supreme Court ?
 

A Harvard magazine has no standing in the UK, the Supreme Court does.

 

Try engaging single brain cell, before rattling keyboard, and making an arse of yourself.

I don’t need to argue with the ruling of the Supreme Court.

 

The existence of multiple variations in gender at birth, refer article I linked, is proof that Gender sits on a spectrum, it is not simply binary ‘male/female’.

 

Your inability to deal with that fact is demonstrated by your resort to yet another personal attack:

 

”Try engaging single brain cell, before rattling keyboard, and making an arse of yourself.”

 

^incidentally, that was me quoting you, any applicability to yourself is purely accidental and not intended.

41 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

So you do not believe in biological sex? 😄

 

It's all in our imagination? 😃

Yes, it's all in our imagination. Or better said, the separation of our concept of sex into two, either/or, classifications is not in accordance with reality.

3 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Science suggests otherwise.

 

The science can say whatever it likes, the thread isn't about the science.

 

It is about the UK's Supreme Court ruling.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t need to argue with the ruling of the Supreme Court.

 

So why are you here, bumping your gums ?
 

The thread is about a ruling made by the UK Supreme Court.

 

1 minute ago, The Cyclist said:

 

The science can say whatever it likes, the thread isn't about the science.

 

It is about the UK's Supreme Court ruling.

Because the science and the facts demonstrate gender is not binary male/female.

 

 

3 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

So why are you here, bumping your gums ?
 

The thread is about a ruling made by the UK Supreme Court.

 

Again a personal attack.

 

 

44 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

There are millions upon millions of hospitals around the world, who determine the Biological sex of newborn babies every day.

 

Take a big long trip, visit them all, and tell them that they are all wrong.

They are not all wrong. They are classifying a newborn's biological sex as either male or female by examining its external reproductive organs, just as they're told to do. If that's going to be the determination, then that's that. What I keep saying is, IMO, there are other factors to consider: internal reproductive organs, chromosomes, and hormone levels, which won't really come into significance until puberty.  

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because the science and the facts demonstrate gender is not binary male/female.

 

 

 

Take your science to the UK Supreme Court.

 

Put your money where your mouth is.

5 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

The science can say whatever it likes, the thread isn't about the science.

 

It is about the UK's Supreme Court ruling.

Like I said, and you chose to ignore, I expect further court cases in the future. Especially as the scientific evidence gets stronger.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again a personal attack.

 

 

 

Yeah, Yeah

 

Everything is a personal attack. I got it.

 

Straight talking offends you, dry your eyes and stay clear then.

18 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Take your science to the UK Supreme Court.

 

Put your money where your mouth is.

Scientist will. As I've suggested more than once.

2 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Like I said, and you chose to ignore, I expect further court cases in the future. Especially as the scientific evidence gets stronger.

 

I am not ignoring anything.

 

The Supreme Court made a ruling. The Scottish Government opted not to appeal that ruling.

 

Really,  nothing more to be said, until @Chomper Higgot gets his crowdfunding  organised and heads to the Supreme Court.

Just now, youreavinalaff said:

Scientist will. As I've suggested more than one.

 

Good for them

This should be a non story. There are only 2 sexes, male and female, no matter what the deluded people think. A male has an XY chromosome and a Female an XX chromosome.

5 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

This should be a non story. There are only 2 sexes, male and female, no matter what the deluded people think. A male has an XY chromosome and a Female an XX chromosome.

Except there aren’t only two genders.

 

 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

Except there aren’t only two genders.

 

 

In your deluded mind there may not be but in reality there are only two

16 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

I am not ignoring anything.

 

The Supreme Court made a ruling. The Scottish Government opted not to appeal that ruling.

 

Really,  nothing more to be said, until @Chomper Higgot gets his crowdfunding  organised and heads to the Supreme Court.

No one on here needs to do anything. In the course of time, there will be more court cases. They'll be brought by others far more informed on the matter than any AN poster.

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

 

 

 

Just now, Photoguy21 said:

In your deluded mind maybe not but in the real world there are only 2

I’ve linked evidence above.

 

You on the other hand have not.

 

 

 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ve linked evidence above.

 

You on the other hand have not.

 

 

 

I cant speak for deluded people but you are definitely one of them. Get some help, you need it.

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Except there aren’t only two genders.

 

 

 

930?

 

 

 

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

I doubt it. However, his decisions do seem to be having an effect on you.

 

A minor source of amusement. 

  • Popular Post
45 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Yes, it's all in our imagination. Or better said, the separation of our concept of sex into two, either/or, classifications is not in accordance with reality.

 

No. It's much simpler than you try to portray (assuming you are actually being serious of course. Which I have my doubts). 

 

One has a penis.

 

One has a vagina.

 

Biological reality. 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No. It's much simpler than you try to portray (assuming you are actually being serious of course. Which I have my doubts). 

 

One has a penis.

 

One has a vagina.

 

Biological reality. 

Read the links that have been posted. Bring yourself out of your cave and educate yourself.

26 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

No one on here needs to do anything.

 

They could try sticking to the topic, which isn't about science.

 

26 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

In the course of time, there will be more court cases.

 

Perhaps there will be more Court Cases, perhaps there will not be.

 

Until then, and they start presenting their case, the facts of this thread is that the UK Supreme Court has made a ruling, as a result of that ruling, Single sex spaces in the UK refer to Biological Sex.

  • Popular Post
4 hours ago, WDSmart said:


We lefties are progressives

Progressives are like a plague of locust destroying everything in their path. 

Screenshot 2025-08-20 at 5.17.42 AM.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.