Is it safe to travel now? U.S. strikes on Iran spark warnings
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
-
Latest posts...
-
573
2025 SSA Form 7162 - "Hello, are you dead yet?" forms.
Am I interpreting this correctly? ALL mail service to the US is suspended? What? -
35
Report Pattaya Car Theft: Indian Owner Claims Professional Scam
Does everyone with a differing perception of your "humour" have to be woke? -
1,680
What Movies or TV shows are you watching (2025)
I had to ask! Could a Lakota arrow in the late 1800's penetrate a whale bone corset and go right through a body? To determine whether a Lakota arrow in the late 1800s could penetrate a whalebone corset and pass through a human body, we need to consider the materials, construction, and context of both the arrow and the corset, as well as the physics of arrow penetration and human anatomy. Here’s a detailed analysis: Lakota Arrows in the Late 1800s Construction: Lakota arrows were typically crafted with wooden shafts, fletched with feathers, and tipped with points made of stone (e.g., flint or obsidian), bone, or, by the late 1800s, metal (often traded or scavenged iron or steel). Metal arrowheads, such as those made from barrel hoops or knife blades, became more common due to contact with European settlers. Force and Penetration: Lakota bows, often sinew-backed short recurve bows, were powerful, with draw weights estimated between 40-70 pounds, capable of propelling arrows at high velocities (100-150 fps or more). A well-crafted metal-tipped arrow could penetrate deeply into soft tissue, and even bone, depending on range, angle, and arrowhead design. Historical accounts of Plains Indian archery, such as those from the Battle of Little Bighorn (1876), describe arrows penetrating deeply into horses or humans, sometimes causing fatal wounds. Arrowhead Design: Metal arrowheads were often narrow and sharp, designed for deep penetration to target vital organs. Stone arrowheads, while effective, were less consistent against hard materials but could still inflict severe wounds. Whalebone Corsets in the Late 1800s Material: "Whalebone" in corsets refers to baleen, a flexible, keratin-based material from the mouths of baleen whales, not skeletal bone. Baleen is tough, lightweight, and pliable when heated by the body, molding to the wearer’s shape. By the late 1800s, many corsets began transitioning to steel boning, but baleen was still used, especially in higher-end or older garments. Construction: Corsets were typically made of cotton, linen, or silk, with baleen or steel stays (strips) sewn into channels to provide structure. A typical corset had 20-50 stays, with a central busk (a rigid strip of baleen, wood, or metal) running down the front, ranging from 10-16 inches long. The busk and stays were designed to shape the torso, not to act as armor, and were relatively thin (1-2 mm for baleen). Some corsets were tight-laced, compressing the waist, but this was not universal. Protective Capacity: Baleen is flexible and softer than bone or metal, offering minimal resistance to sharp, high-velocity projectiles. While it could absorb some impact, it was not designed to stop weapons. Steel boning, if present, might deflect or slow an arrow slightly, but only if struck directly, and steel stays were narrow and spaced apart, leaving gaps. Penetration Analysis Arrow vs. Baleen: A Lakota arrow with a metal or sharp stone tip, shot from a powerful bow at close range (e.g., 20-50 yards), would likely penetrate baleen with ease. Baleen’s pliability and thinness (comparable to modern plastic strips) would offer little resistance to a sharp, high-velocity arrowhead. Even stone arrowheads, while less effective against hard surfaces, could likely pierce baleen due to its softness compared to bone or metal. Corset as a Barrier: The corset’s fabric layers (cotton or silk) and baleen stays might slightly slow an arrow, but not enough to prevent penetration. Historical accounts of arrows piercing multiple layers of clothing (e.g., buffalo hides or soldier uniforms) suggest that a corset’s thin fabric and spaced stays would not significantly impede a well-aimed arrow. If the arrow struck the busk directly, a metal busk might deflect it, but baleen or wood would likely split or shatter. Through the Body: Whether an arrow could pass completely through a human body depends on several factors: Human Anatomy: The human torso contains soft tissue (muscles, organs), ribs, and the spine. An arrow with sufficient force could penetrate soft tissue and exit the body, especially if it avoided bone. Historical records of Plains Indian warfare describe arrows passing through bodies, particularly at close range with metal tips. Arrow Momentum: A metal-tipped arrow from a 50-70 pound bow at close range could retain enough energy after piercing a corset to pass through a torso, especially if it entered a soft area like the abdomen or chest and missed major bones. However, hitting a rib or the spine could stop or deflect the arrow, reducing the likelihood of a clean pass-through. Corset’s Effect: The corset’s compression of the torso might slightly alter the arrow’s path by compacting tissue, but this would not significantly reduce penetration. Tight-lacing could make the torso denser, but baleen itself would not add substantial resistance. Historical Context Lakota Warfare: The Lakota were skilled archers, and their arrows were designed to kill or incapacitate enemies, often targeting vital areas. While there are no specific accounts of Lakota arrows striking whalebone corsets, accounts from the late 1800s (e.g., Wounded Knee or earlier battles) show arrows causing lethal wounds through clothing and flesh. Corsets in the West: In the late 1800s, corsets were common among Euro-American women, including settlers in the American West. However, Lakota encounters with corset-wearing women would have been rare, as corsets were less practical for frontier life, and most Lakota conflicts involved soldiers or male settlers. If a woman wearing a corset were struck, the corset would likely offer negligible protection. Conclusion A Lakota arrow in the late 1800s, particularly with a metal tip, could almost certainly penetrate a whalebone (baleen) corset due to baleen’s relative softness and the corset’s thin, spaced construction. Whether the arrow would pass completely through a human body depends on the shot’s range, angle, and whether it struck bone. At close range with a metal-tipped arrow, penetration through the corset and body is plausible, especially if the arrow hit soft tissue. However, complete pass-through might be less likely if the arrow hit ribs or the spine, though it would still cause severe injury. There’s no historical evidence of corsets being tested against arrows, but their design suggests minimal protective value against such a weapon. -
4
Crime Horrified Crew Detain Rapist Mid-Flight After Teen's Report
Post and response removed. xenophobic generalisations (“pedophiles are common in Switzerland,” “In Indian they marry girls ten years old”). -
174
UK Lucy Connolly to go FREE after outrage !
Tommy Robinson never told his followers to slit the throats of Muslims but he was sent to Prison. -
64
BigC extra on klang
Nothing worse than seeing men walking about with vest tops and sweaty underarm hait.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
.thumb.jpg.3ee24d9400fb02605ea21bc13b1bf901.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now