Report Freed After 23 Years: Woman's 30-Day Sentence Miscarried

[snoop1130]

File photo for reference only

 

In a shocking turn of events in Mandaluyong City, a woman erroneously jailed for over two decades has finally been set free. Originally sentenced to just 30 days for minor injuries, she spent 23 years behind bars due to a judicial oversight.

 

The woman, now in her forties, was initially convicted of murder nearly 25 years ago. This charge, relating to the death of her alleged rapist, carried a severe sentence ranging from 20 to 40 years in prison.

 

Upon review, the Philippines’ Supreme Court reversed the murder conviction. They concluded she should have only served a 30-day sentence for slight physical injuries. Yet, complications in the legal system left her incarcerated well beyond that period.

 

Margarita Gutierrez, Undersecretary for the Department of Justice, stated, "The Supreme Court's decision, issued in January 2024, was lost amidst bureaucracy." The woman was finally liberated on Christmas Day 2024, following a writ of habeas corpus filed by the DOJ Action Center (DOJAC).

 

Gutierrez, leading the DOJAC, revealed that the woman’s release relied on the Quezon City Regional Trial Court’s swift action. "Without our intervention, she might still be in the Correctional Institution for Women," noted Gutierrez.

 

Reflecting on the case, Gutierrez explained that the woman and two men were initially charged with the murder of her alleged assailant. During a drinking spree, one of the men reportedly assaulted her, but was halted by the woman and her companions. Tragically, the man later died from multiple stab wounds inflicted by one of her co-accused.

 

Upon reaching the Supreme Court, evidential clarity emerged: the woman had merely been involved in restraining the man, while another had committed the lethal act. Despite this insight, procedural delays meant her release was stalled.

 

The DOJAC’s involvement was crucial. As the Supreme Court's decision lingered in reconsideration limbo, and the woman’s sentence grossly exceeded the prescribed 30 days, they moved promptly for a habeas corpus petition.

 

This case spotlights stark issues within the judicial framework. Gutierrez stressed the importance of vigilance and timely action in safeguarding against miscarriage of justice, urging legal entities to prioritise corrective measures for such lapses.

 

The incident highlights systemic challenges that must be addressed to prevent similar occurrences. Investigations into how the decision was delayed for so long are now critical.

 

Ultimately, this case serves as a potent reminder of the importance of due diligence within the justice system. As the woman regains her freedom, her story underscores a pressing need for reform and vigilance to protect those vulnerable to prolonged wrongful imprisonment.

 

In currency terms, the costs of such legal battles and long-term incarcerations can be substantial. With each year of imprisonment roughly costing the state about 15,000 Thai Baht per inmate, her undue sentence has led to unnecessary expenses, further highlighting the broader implications of judicial errors.

 

This tale of justice delayed is a call to action for legal reformers, emphasising the stakes involved in ensuring the accuracy and efficiency of court proceedings.

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Manila Bulletin 2025-08-26