On 9/15/2025 at 11:11 AM, Cameroni said:

 

No, it was a rank amateur 22 year old furry who lived with a transsexual and was an ANTIFA  susbcriber.

 

He aimed for the head and failed to calculate his elevated position, so he hit the neck by accident. 

 

Highly experienced snipers came to that conclusion.

Well, the little fairy tale of Lee Harvey Oswald back on 22 November 1963 springs to mind then ....... whoever shot Kennedy, it was - for sure - not Lee Harvey Oswald. 

2 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

Well, the little fairy tale of Lee Harvey Oswald back on 22 November 1963 springs to mind then ....... whoever shot Kennedy, it was - for sure - not Lee Harvey Oswald. 

 

So what are you saying? Robinson didn't shoot Kirk?

11 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

So what are you saying? Robinson didn't shoot Kirk?

 

Already some conspiracy theories that he was a patsy and the whole thing was set up to foment more anger.  Ridiculous maybe; although if there's an Oswald/Jack Ruby replay in the next few days, or an Epstein 'suicide', it won't go away!

20 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

So what are you saying? Robinson didn't shoot Kirk?

I am not in a position to say anything but by the media (where else do we get information?) it was a "professional" shot from far away which requires skills. Possibly it was - alternatively - a co-incident. But all aspects have to be checked by professional law enforcement specialists. 

All I was saying is, that years later on only it surfaced, that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have shot Kennedy and the whole thing was fabricated. Since Oswald was killed by Jacob Leon Rubenstein (Jack Ruby) next day, the file on Oswald got closed and filed away for good. 

Robinson is certainly weird (as per media again) and might have had issues with Kirk's position but killing a person over what (s)he says .......... Given Robinson's young age, lack of military background and unstable mental condition I just suggest to look at ALL options to ensure, that the right person gets handed down - hopefully - a death sentence to rid the society and the tax payer of such "undesirable" characters! 

You never realize when saints walk amongst us. 

Troy Nehls Texas republican, eulogized slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, claiming he would have been Jesus' "13th disciple" if he lived in bible times. That in a congressional subcommittee meeting.

Wow.        

Just now, Dcheech said:

You never realize when saints walk amongst us. 

Troy Nehls Texas republican, eulogized slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk, claiming he would have been Jesus' "13th disciple" if he lived in bible times. That in a congressional subcommittee meeting.

Wow.        

 Yes, the sanctification of Kirk by some is getting ridiculous!

26 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 Yes, the sanctification of Kirk by some is getting ridiculous!

I would bet 100% of people outside the US had never heard of him, and probably 99% of US citizens also. But with the media, the WH and social hype, he is now the new messiah. Mind boggling.

21 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Already some conspiracy theories that he was a patsy

 

Yes, I saw that, but what is the evidence for that, and above all, why would Robinson go willingly to the death penalty just to be a patsy?

 

Doesn't make much sense on the facts does it?

49 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

it was a "professional" shot from far away which requires skills.

 

No, it was a very easy shot an amateuer could do. See here:

 

 

50 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

Robinson is certainly weird (as per media again) and might have had issues with Kirk's position but killing a person over what (s)he says .......... Given Robinson's young age, lack of military background and unstable mental condition I just suggest to look at ALL options to ensure, that the right person gets handed down

 

He certainly is weird and I agree that killing a person for his political views is very odd. But to say he was a patsy for others, I mean why would he go to the death penalty for others? Plus there's DNA evidence now.

 

And what is the evidence that someone else is the shooter?

12 minutes ago, couchpotato said:

I would bet 100% of people outside the US had never heard of him, and probably 99% of US citizens also. But with the media, the WH and social hype, he is now the new messiah. Mind boggling.

 

Somewhat stupid to take him out then for having a different opinion to the left then don't you think?  Although you are somewhat naive to believe he didn't have that amount of people who have heard of him just based on the reaction to it happening alone.   His organization will now be headed by his widow and attract an unimaginable amount of followers compared to what it would have done if the left could have just let him carry on with debating college students in good faith.  He wasn't a martyr before his execution in front of his wife and 2 little kids, but he is now.   He was such a moderate voice as well.  What comes next, as you have already seen, will be less moderate and will garner far more support.   

On 9/14/2025 at 9:44 PM, Sydebolle said:

This though is not possible as one ends in hell ......... 

 

Not sure what you're getting at.

They will meet in hell because both Kirk and the killer are going to hell?

where they will be greeted by Ozzy Osbourne? 

 

11 hours ago, couchpotato said:

I would bet 100% of people outside the US had never heard of him, and probably 99% of US citizens also. But with the media, the WH and social hype, he is now the new messiah. Mind boggling.

 

I had never heard of him. 

This seems to be blown way out of proportion. 

 

1 hour ago, save the frogs said:

 

Not sure what you're getting at.

They will meet in hell because both Kirk and the killer are going to hell?

where they will be greeted by Ozzy Osbourne? 

 

Maybe I was referring to the assassin - being the one going to hell? 

Of course Kirk is not heading there as he was not the assassin!

Hell is scary though. A horned guy poking you in the ass with a pitchfork while you sit in a hot cauldron?

 

I don't know, I don't fancy that.

5 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

Maybe I was referring to the assassin - being the one going to hell? 

Of course Kirk is not heading there as he was not the assassin!

 

The only thing happening to Charlie Kirk's remains is if he is cremated, the remains will add to global warming, and if he is buried he will be worm food. There is no heaven or hell. 

13 minutes ago, Sydebolle said:

Maybe I was referring to the assassin - being the one going to hell? 

Of course Kirk is not heading there as he was not the assassin!

He might be going to hell or heaven  because of his sins no matter we believe if there is a god described in Abrahams family books. Who are we to judge who is going or not? 

 

Kirk was not all good man, just get over it, but still some people choose him as an martyr because one lunatic shot and killed him. 

 

Just another political gain and tool, nothing else. The man was popular because what he said and stood up for which was extreme opinions hurting a lot of people. 

 

 

On 9/15/2025 at 9:00 AM, spidermike007 said:

If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.

– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024

 

 

   There was  recent scandal where it was exposed that some pilots from foreign Countries around the World were not qualified to be pilots .

   They have fake pilots certificates and were piloting planes unqualified .

      That could be from where his concerns stem from ?

2 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   There was  recent scandal where it was exposed that some pilots from foreign Countries around the World were not qualified to be pilots .

   They have fake pilots certificates and were piloting planes unqualified .

      That could be from where his concerns stem from ?

His comments were nothing to do with "fake" pilots.. just racist rhetoric

Posts with oversized trolling emojis have been removed.

4 hours ago, couchpotato said:

His comments were nothing to do with "fake" pilots.. just racist rhetoric

 

I've seen this so many times now I'm going to post the full context.   He was making a fair point about DEI creating unhealthy thinking patterns.  Those who see racism everywhere, under the bed, in their cupboards, particularly in the mirror and who are deeply unsatisfied that the supply of racism never meets their demands for it will no doubt continue to claim its racist, but the comments he makes after this make it pretty clear it is not.   DEI is a political choice, and all political choices should be able to be debated and criticized should they not?  Or would you prefer to live in a world where you are not allowed to criticize political choices?

 

The context:  

 

KOLVET: We've all been in the back of a plane when the turbulence hits or when you're flying through a storm and you're like, "I'm so glad I saw the guy with the right stuff and the square jaw get into the cockpit before we took off. And I feel better now, thinking about that." 

KIRK: You wanna go thought crime? I'm sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified."

KOLVET: But you wouldn't have done that before!

KIRK: That's not an immediate … that's not who I am. That's not what I believe. 

NEFF: It is the reality the left has created. 

KIRK: I want to be as blunt as possible because now I'm connecting two dots. Wait a second, this CEO just said that he's forcing that a white qualified guy is not gonna get the job. So I see this guy, he might be a nice person and I say, "Boy, I hope he's not a Harvard-style affirmative-action student that … landed half of his flight-simulator trials." 

KOLVET: Such a good point. That's so fair. 

KIRK: It also … creates unhealthy thinking patterns. I don't wanna think that way. And no one should, right? … And by the way, then you couple it with the FAA, air-traffic control, they got a bunch of morons and affirmative-action people. 

 

Then responding to a student who brought this up in a college debate he further said:

 

When it comes to pilots or surgeons, if I see somebody who is Black, as I said on the show, I'm going to hope that that person is qualified. That's what I said, which of course is legitimate because they're begging the question, we're not hiring based on merit anymore. We're hiring based on race.

A post with unattributed content has been removed.  Please provide a link to the source of information when posting. 

Wait...Charlie bought the State Farm?

On 9/16/2025 at 4:04 PM, spidermike007 said:

You mentioned power and control, but what about money? In the history of America have the politicians on the right ever been this greedy? How many billions has Trump made since January? And how many on the right are questioning his legitimate right to do that using the pulpit of the presidency as a franchise. 

 

Sure, kinda goes without saying, but yes, the divide between rich and poor has never been greater and the MAGA agenda is obviously to make the richer richer and poorer poorer, money buys power and control.

On 9/18/2025 at 11:09 AM, James105 said:

 

Somewhat stupid to take him out then for having a different opinion to the left then don't you think?  Although you are somewhat naive to believe he didn't have that amount of people who have heard of him just based on the reaction to it happening alone.   His organization will now be headed by his widow and attract an unimaginable amount of followers compared to what it would have done if the left could have just let him carry on with debating college students in good faith.  He wasn't a martyr before his execution in front of his wife and 2 little kids, but he is now.   He was such a moderate voice as well.  What comes next, as you have already seen, will be less moderate and will garner far more support.   

One person took him out.

Not the left or anything else.

One person acting for one person.

Yes a stupid and evil thing to have done.

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

One person took him out.

Not the left or anything else.

One person acting for one person.

Yes a stupid and evil thing to have done.

Take a few steps back and try to look at the broader picture, or better yet go back to Walt Whitman and clear your head with something else for awhile.

6 minutes ago, novacova said:

Take a few steps back and try to look at the broader picture, or better yet go back to Walt Whitman and clear your head with something else for awhile.

Huh?

26 minutes ago, novacova said:

Take a few steps back and try to look at the broader picture, or better yet go back to Walt Whitman and clear your head with something else for awhile.

 

You mean, believe what you'd like to believe?  Sit in the victim chair created by the MAGA right wing propaganda machine led by Fox news? Further the hate towards this concocted BS by the right wing agenda of a "radical left enemy"? Is that what you call the "broader picture". Why don't you take a step back and look at what you are believing?

10 minutes ago, StandardIssue said:

 

You mean, believe what you'd like to believe?  Sit in the victim chair created by the MAGA right wing propaganda machine led by Fox news? Further the hate towards this concocted BS by the right wing agenda of a "radical left enemy"? Is that what you call the "broader picture". Why don't you take a step back and look at what you are believing?

Hey man, it’s you folks on the left that are solely responsible for creating MAGA, you outta be mighty proud of yourselves…5-5-5…555!

1 hour ago, novacova said:

Hey man, it’s you folks on the left that are solely responsible for creating MAGA, you outta be mighty proud of yourselves…5-5-5…555!

Twisted interpretation on the origin of Maga. It was Ronald Reagan's campaign slogan that Trump copied and make it dark. The radical rights like the Heritage Foundation found a useful idiot to further their cause to take the country backwards. 

 

On 9/16/2025 at 9:08 AM, StandardIssue said:

 

While nobody deserves to be murdered, these comments make it clear that this guy was joining in the backwards, hate filled, prejudiced chorus of the MAGA movement. 

 

He was not an influencer. He was a divisive bigoted racist who aligned himself with the MAGA doctrine. Let’s not pretend.