File photos

 

US Vice President JD Vance took over hosting duties on "The Charlie Kirk Show" following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Kirk was shot and killed at Utah Valley University, leaving a significant void for his organisation, Turning Point USA. Vance, expressing deep respect, honoured Kirk by leading the show and sharing memories of their friendship in the White House complex.

 

At just 31, Kirk had a significant influence on American conservatism and maintained close ties with notable individuals such as President Trump. After his tragic death, Kirk’s body was transferred via the vice president’s plane to Arizona, with Vance altering his schedule to accompany it. Vance highlighted Kirk's influence, noting their collaboration in his political journey, including his encouragement by Kirk to pursue the vice-presidential role.

 

The show featured discussions on the climate of political violence, with Vance and guests emphasising the urgency of justice in response to Kirk's assassination. Stephen Miller, the deputy chief of staff, promised to take action against extremist networks thought to be involved in the crime. There was a call for unity but a strong insistence on facing the truth about political violence.

 

While touching on future plans, Vance assured listeners of the continuation of Kirk’s work, with support from figures such as Tucker Carlson and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Erika Kirk, Charlie's widow, reinforced her commitment to sustaining his efforts, signalling the movement's resilience.

 

A memorial for Kirk is planned for 21 September in Arizona, solidifying his legacy and the continued momentum of his mission in conservative political circles.

 

 

 

Key Takeaways

 

• Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a university event last week.
• Vice President JD Vance hosted Kirk's show as a tribute to his influence.
• A memorial service will be held on 21 September in Arizona.

 

Related Stories:

 

Charlie Kirk Tragically Killed in Utah Event Shooting 

Charlie Kirk Shooting: Unraveling the Motive Behind the Attack 

 

 

  Adapted by ASEAN Now from CBS News 2025-09-16

 

 

So we’re was the clarion call to fire the Fox News host advocating for killing the homeless?in my view they will milk this unfortunate murder for all its worth using it as an excuse to de platform anyone who disagree with their views……sounds familiar somehow hummm……..

Trying to milk this for all it's worth to cause unrest , while those in charge rob the place and clear all their hidden pasts.

Full show...

 

awesome guests, Stephen Miller is the best ever.

 

 

On 9/16/2025 at 7:01 AM, Tug said:

So we’re was the clarion call to fire the Fox News host advocating for killing the homeless?in my view they will milk this unfortunate murder for all its worth using it as an excuse to de platform anyone who disagree with their views……sounds familiar somehow hummm……..

You mean like the left milked George Floyd’s death for months of burning and looting?

 

 

4 minutes ago, ronster said:

Trying to milk this for all it's worth to cause unrest , while those in charge rob the place and clear all their hidden pasts.

It is the left dividing the country, much more than the right. 

5 minutes ago, ronster said:

Trying to milk this for all it's worth to cause unrest , while those in charge rob the place and clear all their hidden pasts.

 

Yes they really should just shut up about it when radical anti "fascist" leftists assassinate conservatives with a bullet to the neck in front of their family.

 

 

3 minutes ago, mogandave said:

You mean like the left milked George Floyd’s death for months of burning and looting?

 

 

I’m sure your mistaken many decent people rose up in support of our citizens of color after witnessing the murder of Mr Floyd in broad daylight on video handcuffed helpless in full view of people telling the stupid cop to let up on the guy.you also neglected to mention the felon egging on the unrest trying to foment hate and division.and yes George Floyd was a sketchy dude no doubt about it still no excuses for what the cops willfully did.

Why are extreme right-wing speakers called "activists," and extreme left-wing speakers called "terrorists"? 🤔

5 minutes ago, mogandave said:

It is the left dividing the country, much more than the right. 

 

No No No.

 

You have it all wrong.

 

Assassinating political opponents is not divisive.

 

Talking about it afterwards is what's divisive.  

 

 

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No No No.

 

You have it all wrong.

 

Assassinating political opponents is not divisive.

 

Talking about it afterwards is what's divisive.  

 

 

Kirk wasn’t anyone’s political opponent.

 

 

Troll post removed 

@save the frogs

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Kirk wasn’t anyone’s political opponent.

 

 

 

Of course he was.

 

Ask Tyler Robinson.

Oh for CRYING out loud - it doesn't matter what frickin' side of the aisle you are, the Vice President of the United States has NO business hosting a goddamned show. Doesn't he have a real job?

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Of course he was.

 

Ask Tyler Robinson.

Ask anyone on the left. 

 

If the left did not oppose him, people like chompers would not be misquoting and lying about him. 

 

If what they say were true, there would no need to lie.

3 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Oh for CRYING out loud - it doesn't matter what frickin' side of the aisle you are, the Vice President of the United States has NO business hosting a goddamned show. Doesn't he have a real job?

But it’s fine for Obama, Clinton, Harris etc. to make the rounds on all the leftist shows. 

 

Kirk and Vance were friends. 

6 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Oh for CRYING out loud - it doesn't matter what frickin' side of the aisle you are, the Vice President of the United States has NO business hosting a goddamned show. Doesn't he have a real job?

 

I'm sure you'd much rather he (and everyone else) just shut up about Kirk's assassination by the far left extremist. 

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

But it’s fine for Obama, Clinton, Harris etc. to make the rounds on all the leftist shows. 

 

Kirk and Vance were friends. 

The View lol

21 minutes ago, Tug said:

I’m sure your mistaken many decent people rose up in support of our citizens of color after witnessing the murder of Mr Floyd in broad daylight on video handcuffed helpless in full view of people telling the stupid cop to let up on the guy.you also neglected to mention the felon egging on the unrest trying to foment hate and division.and yes George Floyd was a sketchy dude no doubt about it still no excuses for what the cops willfully did.

No doubt there were many decent people people peacefully protesting. But do you not think that allowing burning, looting and assaulting to go on for months was divisive? 

 

The felon wad dead, how was he egging it on?

1 minute ago, mogandave said:

No doubt there were many decent people people peacefully protesting. But do you not think that allowing burning, looting and assaulting to go on for months was divisive? 

 

The felon wad dead, how was he egging it on?

The felon I’m referring to is your deity Donald jhon trump.

The leftist media being called out for lying to such a degree that they have lost all credibility and most all non-leftists just laugh at them truly warms my heart. 

 

And all the silly leftists here can do lie and post links to other lying leftists to “prove” they are not lying.

Fact Check: Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment https://share.google/y64GOqFZlP8TKHpaW

 

May want to revisit the cost benefit analysis on this.

For the record, before I'm accused of being a raging, leftist anti christ, I found his talks to be eloquent and well prepared. I do not support violence in this or any other scenario.

10 minutes ago, Tug said:

The felon I’m referring to is your deity Donald jhon trump.

QED

 

This is an example of one such lying leftist.

Just now, animalmagic said:

Fact Check: Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment https://share.google/y64GOqFZlP8TKHpaW

 

May want to revisit the cost benefit analysis on this.

For the record, before I'm accused of being a raging, leftist anti christ, I found his talks to be eloquent and well prepared. I do not support violence in this or any other scenario.

If you support gun rights, you have to assume there are going to be gun deaths.

 

Just as if you support abortion rights, there will be some abortions that go wrong and kill the mother. 

 

 

Just now, mogandave said:

If you support gun rights, you have to assume there are going to be gun deaths.

 

Just as if you support abortion rights, there will be some abortions that go wrong and kill the mother. 

 

 

The first case is an intended death, the second an unintended consequence. 

An embryo can be frozen and does not die, a child cannot. Is an embryo really a child?

7 minutes ago, mogandave said:

QED

 

This is an example of one such lying leftist.

Hey Dave look on the bright side at least it’s temporarily taken the heat off your deity’s decades long close friendship with one of the worlds most prolific child rapists that I’m aware of.

2 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

The first case is an intended death, the second an unintended consequence. 

An embryo can be frozen and does not die, a child cannot. Is an embryo really a child?

No. You are regurgitating common false claim.   Guns are not intended for death, unless you include war and hunting. Deaths are an unintended consequence of a free people being armed.

 

Over a hundred million homes with guns in the US, so the idea that guns are intend for death is false.

9 minutes ago, Tug said:

Hey Dave look on the bright side at least it’s temporarily taken the heat off your deity’s decades long close friendship with one of the worlds most prolific child rapists that I’m aware of.

You truly are away of so little. I guess that makes it easy to lie incessantly. 

11 minutes ago, mogandave said:

No. You are regurgitating common false claim.   Guns are not intended for death, unless you include war and hunting. Deaths are an unintended consequence of a free people being armed.

 

Over a hundred million homes with guns in the US, so the idea that guns are intend for death is false.

Guns are not intended for death?!

What are you smoking? 

News on 404media.co today says the DOJ has taken down a report showing that domestic terrorism is mostly right wing. 

https://www.404media.co/doj-deletes-study-showing-domestic-terrorists-are-most-often-right-wing/

https://www.alternet.org/search/?q=Trump+DOJ

I guess disappearing information is one way to prove it's the other guy.