23 minutes ago, mogandave said:

Yes, only the left is allowed ti use chat GTP as “proof”

ChatGPT proof is just liberal magic — apparently the secret code is called critical thinking.

19 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

ChatGPT proof is just liberal magic — apparently the secret code is called critical thinking.

It must secret, no one on the left seems to know about it. 

 

Post more links to the people tgat tell you what to think

1 hour ago, mymonkeyhusb said:

Thanks for your reply.

 

I simply wanted to see if there are reasonable explanations that support Trump's decision. I heard from one side's argument and wanted another perspective. I disagree my simple motive of hearing alternative arguments is biased framing. If anything, I wanted to prevent biased framing by selecting Chat GPT 5.

 

Thinking about it, I don't think I posted the actual query in the Chat GPT question box and that might allow for miscommunication. Sorry for that.

 

I see people in the left and the right living in an echo chamber passing the same simple messages that reaffirm their viewpoints; people sitting in an echo chamber, listening only to themselves. Same with politicized websites.  Hence I dared to see what Chat GPT 5 may offer hopefully outside the encountered bias I couldn't avoid.

 

I never waved Chat GTP 5 as an authority. I just posted the fresh perspective from Chat GPT 5. Not sure how you can say I had an "illogical appeal to authority by waving ChatGPT like proof — when it only reflects what you feed it, like any other text editor".

 

"If you were really serious, you’d use AI to run a high-level fact-check alongside a logical fallacy and biased framing analysis, and keep going until you have something that holds up."

 

You obviously have much more training in search methods than I and I respect that.

 

 "Until then, you’re just quoting yourself." Well, I disagree.  I'm guilty of quoting Chat GPT 5.

 

Thanks. All the best to you.

You lost me at The Federalist. The first reference of yours I saw last week was a quote from that site. Coincidence? Occam’s razor usually points to true north. Cheers!

22 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

You lost me at The Federalist. The first reference of yours I saw last week was a quote from that site. Coincidence? Occam’s razor usually points to true north. Cheers!

A prime example of the “secret lefty logic”.

 

Rather than arguing a point, just discount it out of hand, only because of where it came from. That’s a great tool. 

 

It this not what one would call an Ad Hominem fallacy? 

53 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

You lost me at The Federalist. The first reference of yours I saw last week was a quote from that site. Coincidence? Occam’s razor usually points to true north. Cheers!

Thanks for your reply.

 

I think we're experiencing the foibles of internet texting... meaning it's easy to misunderstand or misinterpret what's being received. 

The Federalist quotes were posted because after much time and many many fruitless searches, it was the first website that quoted the actual words of FCC's Carr and sure I made a mistake by not finding other sources.  My excuse is I had spent a ridiculous amount of time trying to find a quote... any quote... and was happy to find quotes from Carr and posted it. You'll notice that the next source was Chat GTP, a hidden indicator to everyone reading my post that I was very fed up with the difficulty finding info. If I had found accurate Carr quotes on a leftist website,  I would have posted from that source.

 

If I comprehend what Occam's razor is about; when you have two or more explanations for the same phenomenon, you should choose the simplest one, requiring the fewest statements that are taken for granted... the resulting explanation should be preferred... then I think Occam's razor isn't applicable here because there's no competing explanation nor a same phenomena. I just search for info, facts wherever I find them to help me understand what's happening. Is it coincidence I search for alternative viewpoints? I think you'd say coincidence isn't a factor.

 

I enjoy AN as I can exercise my ability to think and grow through others, like you, sharing their thoughts with me.

 

I'm going to take a break from AN for a while, wife wants a veggie garden. How about giving our discussion a cordial mai pen lai and choak dee? 

 

All the best to you!

Certainly Trump thought banning Antifa (which is not an organisation) could work not that the UK has banned Palestine Action. Anti-fascist activists need red paint.

3 hours ago, mymonkeyhusb said:

 

I'm going to take a break from AN for a while, wife wants a veggie garden. How about giving our discussion a cordial mai pen lai and choak dee? 

 

 

    50 posts in 17 years .

You go and have  rest, put your feet up for  while .

Take it easy after your recent exertion 

21 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

    50 posts in 17 years .

You go and have  rest, put your feet up for  while .

Take it easy after your recent exertion 

Oh... how did I get dragged into this?
 Well I sometimes lapse into believing people are naturally kind, human nature is loving until someone reminds me otherwise.

Thanks Nick.

2 minutes ago, mymonkeyhusb said:

Oh... how did I get dragged into this?
 Well I sometimes lapse into believing people are naturally kind, human nature is loving until someone reminds me otherwise.

Thanks Nick.

 

   Sorry, did I upset you ?

I didn't mean to .

I apologised to you .

Now, please will you apologize to me ?

Your reply was rather unpleasant and it upset me 

On 9/20/2025 at 10:10 PM, shdmn said:

Speaking of WWII vets (ie. ANTIFA).  This woman (Queen Elizabeth II) served more time in the British Army than all three Trump generations.

 

 

 

    Whats going on online ?

The internet is being swamped with World War 2 photos clamming that all and sundry are "Anti Fa" .

  Photos of allied solders from WW2 all stating they were antifa .

Is there a organized online campaign by Lefties trying to portray antifa as the good guys ?

   Where did you  get the idea of positing the Queen as antifa ?

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

    Whats going on online ?

The internet is being swamped with World War 2 photos clamming that all and sundry are "Anti Fa" .

  Photos of allied solders from WW2 all stating they were antifa .

Is there a organized online campaign by Lefties trying to portray antifa as the good guys ?

   Where did you  get the idea of positing the Queen as antifa ?

They are just pointing out the usual trumpist hypocrisy even for a trumper the comparison should be easy to comprehend……but then again they follow trump …..your ilk needs a better figurehead trumps toast.

12 minutes ago, Tug said:

They are just pointing out the usual trumpist hypocrisy even for a trumper the comparison should be easy to comprehend……but then again they follow trump …..your ilk needs a better figurehead trumps toast.

 

    I doubt very much whether WW2 veterans would be supportive of todays Antifas .

  USA still had segregation , Blacks and Whites didn't mix and homosexuality was illegal .

   WW2 veterans would likely be racist homophobes back then , not much in common with todays anti fa 

Posts contravening our Standards of Conduct have been removed:

 

12. AI use is allowed only in small amounts (a short paragraph). Posts must also include your own views. AI-only posts will be removed. Please mark AI use with “AI supported.”

Trump. Get your own house in order before you start calling your political opponents terrorists.

On 9/25/2025 at 7:54 PM, TedG said:

This is the typical nastiness from the left. 

Indeed:

8 minutes ago, morrobay said:

Indeed:

ignored now as your so hateful I think your time is up ..