Dems are asking  to put military personnel life at risk and thats wrong ,says a former CIA agent...

 

 

15 minutes ago, howlee101 said:

Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) is also required training.  I retired from the military years ago but I recall it was training required at least annually.  The squadron also had refresher training before any deployment.

 

The term "illegal orders", used by the 6 Dem members of Congress, didn't contain any specifics.  Obviously, being ordered to shoot/kill an innocent civilian would be illegal.  However, it today's battlefield, the enemy combatants aren't so easily easily distinguishable...meaning the enemy doesn't necessarily wear a uniform.

"meaning the enemy doesn't necessarily wear a uniform".

 

Terrorist  for one example.

It's useful to remember that Pete Hegseth pushed strongly for the pardon of a soldier named Clint Lorance who was convicted of murder. This guy was so evil that he was turned in by his own men. It's part of a larger trend by the Trump administration to pardon soldiers convicted of war crimes. Hegseth has also eviscerated JAG, which among other duties, advises the military on Constitutional constraints on their use of force.

The USA has become to soft on Crime,especially the drugs that are sent in ,that help kill thousands. The Criminal enterprize surrounding illegal hard core drugs has always been a crisis.  And now the Dems 6 of them are giving advice to the Military .The same dems who were in charge in the Afghan departure and  Gaza and Ukraine conflicts. 

“In your professional military opinions, if we started killing narcoterrorists and sinking Chinese ships that are bringing poison into the Western Hemisphere, would that reduce the amount of stuff coming into the Western Hemisphere and reduce the amount of American citizens that are being poisoned to death?” he asked.

 

Reply by the Military:“Well, I think if we aggressively stop them, it will, it will bring it down,” he said.

 

https://nypost.com/2025/04/01/us-news/gop-lawmaker-asks-why-military-cant-just-kill-narcoterrorists-shocking-top-commanders/

2 hours ago, billd766 said:

As is murdering civilians on small boats in international waters under ANY excuse. The order to do so is an illegal order, no matter WHO gives that order, and the responsibility goes all the way up from the person who actually gave that order to the person in charge of the military and beyond, unless a specific order not to do so, in writing, has been issued.

Tell us about Baracks murder of a US citizen.

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us about Baracks murder of a US citizen.

"The dems are sliding towards Sedition" ! But are they lookin to grotesquely   change the midterm dynamic with Slotkin in a swing state playing the victim. The Dem Democracy is so devious.

 

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6385335798112

14 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Tell us about Baracks murder of a US citizen.

 

You mean the terrorist that there was credible evidence was planning attacks on American targets. That dual citizen? I asked Grok (AI) about that and here is the answer.

So not at all anything like firing on drug smugglers not even heading to the US, obviously.

Anything else you wonder about, buddy?

 

2 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

You mean the terrorist that there was credible evidence was planning attacks on American targets. That dual citizen? I asked Grok (AI) about that and here is the answer.

So not at all anything like firing on drug smugglers not even heading to the US, obviously.

Anything else you wonder about, buddy?

What crime were these US Citizens charged with?   

 

 

1 minute ago, Mike_Hunt said:

What crime were these US Citizens charged with?   

 

 

I cannot help you with your reading comprehension, buddy. It's pretty clearly laid out in the AI answer.

BTW, which citizens are you referring to?

1 minute ago, Mike_Hunt said:

There is so much wrong with this with this post. 

 

Where is no evidence of pedophilia.  I wager you don't even define the term.

 

How is Trump a traitor?  

I can't be a***d to spell it out again. He tried to prevent the legal transfer of power.

'nuff said.

2 hours ago, riclag said:

"meaning the enemy doesn't necessarily wear a uniform".

 

Terrorist  for one example.

 

What would we do without his insight ?

3 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

I cannot help you with your reading comprehension, buddy. It's pretty clearly laid out in the AI answer.

BTW, which citizens are you referring to?

They are not charged with a crime.   Obama's extrajudicial killings were illegal. 

4 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

BTW, which citizens are you referring to?

The US Citizens that Obama killed who were not charged with a crime. 

2 hours ago, riclag said:

"meaning the enemy doesn't necessarily wear a uniform".

 

Terrorist  for one example.

And who defines that a person is a terrorist and not a freedom fighter?

 

And who defines that a person is an enemy?

16 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

They are not charged with a crime.   Obama's extrajudicial killings were illegal. 

Thank you for your valuable opinion, your honor!😂

Would you follow an order given by Trump or Hegseth, with the crazy things

that come out of their mouths , 🤡

 

regards worgeordie 

8 minutes ago, billd766 said:

And who defines that a person is a terrorist and not a freedom fighter?

 

And who defines that a person is an enemy?

 

 

TRUMP!

25 minutes ago, BLMFem said:

Thank you for your valuable opinion, your honor!😂

Fifth Amendment

 

 

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

 

 

 

34 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Fifth Amendment

 

 

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

 

 

 

If only the current s**t show of an administration was as knowledgeable of the US constitution as you are then dozens/hundreds of people wouldn't have their rights trampled on by the US Gestapo on a daily basis!

 

 

4 hours ago, billd766 said:

As is murdering civilians on small boats in international waters under ANY excuse. The order to do so is an illegal order, no matter WHO gives that order, and the responsibility goes all the way up from the person who actually gave that order to the person in charge of the military and beyond, unless a specific order not to do so, in writing, has been issued.

Yeah right, suppose you believe the insurgents that killed countless people in Afghanistan and al-qaeda that killed thousands of civilians in the US are innocent civilians too. Terrorist are designated enmity combatants, doesn’t matter what method they use to kill Americans.

5 hours ago, Purdey said:

Does no one think it strange that with a heck load of warships in the Caribbean they have not even bothered to capture one of those boats and searched it, then photographed the cargo - before murdering the crew?

The Coast Guard has seized over 500,000 lbs of cocaine on the Caribbean in 2025 

3 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Where is no evidence of pedophilia

Unlike the first hand evidence of creepy Joe Biden where his daughter, Ashley Biden, describes showers taken with her father when she was a child as "probably not appropriate."

2 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

TRUMP!

As is his prerogative 

6 hours ago, Purdey said:

Does no one think it strange that with a heck load of warships in the Caribbean they have not even bothered to capture one of those boats and searched it, then photographed the cargo - before murdering the crew?

Ludicrous statement. That is not the mission of a warship.

16 minutes ago, howlee101 said:

Ludicrous statement. That is not the mission of a warship.

What the mission of any warship is, depends on the orders it's given.

Hope this helps.

3 hours ago, BLMFem said:

I can't be a***d to spell it out again. He tried to prevent the legal transfer of power.

'nuff said.

So basically you have nothing but the usual liberal name calling nonsense. Right buddy.....

48 minutes ago, nattaya09 said:

The Coast Guard has seized over 500,000 lbs of cocaine on the Caribbean in 2025 

How many people did they have to kill to accomplish that?

Did they ever stop any boats that didn't have cocaine in them?

Did they blow them up with the crews on board anyway?

4 hours ago, Mike_Hunt said:

The US Citizens that Obama killed who were not charged with a crime. 

 

Ahhhh he was an imminent threat ok.

53 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

So basically you have nothing but the usual liberal name calling nonsense. Right buddy.....

So you mean he didn't lie when he said the 2020 election was stolen and tried to stop the legal transfer of power?

Is that what you're claiming, bud?😆

31 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

Ahhhh he was an imminent threat ok.

Yep, unlike the drug smugglers who are blown to pieces while heading to.....not the US.

Well done, blazes, you're getting there!