1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

You call them "hate topics". Which is of course a deflection. How are my alleged feelings relevant to the the facts? Do facts change because of someone's feelings?It's you bringing the issue of emotion into this, not me. Why not try sticking to the facts and address them? In other words, you've got nothing.

I have you starting more than one Trump hate topic a day. That seems like something. Perhaps an obsession? Not counting the numerous trolling, baiting, dissembling and outright lies you add to any other topic about Trump.

Is it "possible" that Bidens INS/DOJ did nothing about Melanias alleged violation of Immigration laws because there was nothing there?

2 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

I have you starting more than one Trump hate topic a day. That seems like something. Perhaps an obsession? Not counting the numerous trolling, baiting, dissembling and outright lies you add to any other topic about Trump.

Is it "possible" that Bidens INS/DOJ did nothing about Melanias alleged violation of Immigration laws because there was nothing there?

Once again you seem unable to understand that calling it a "hate topic" is alleging a motive. They're topics. Calling them hate topic is making it about me. Calling it an obsession just compounds the illegitimacy. I'm not a subject of any topic posted in aseannow.com. At least not legitimately posted. The rules preclude that. Stick to the subject and stop your speculations and accusations about the character and motives of others in this forum.

27 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Once again you seem unable to understand that calling it a "hate topic" is alleging a motive. They're topics. Calling them hate topic is making it about me. Calling it an obsession just compounds the illegitimacy. I'm not a subject of any topic posted in aseannow.com. At least not legitimately posted. The rules preclude that. Stick to the subject and stop your speculations and accusations about the character and motives of others in this forum.

Your 21 topics this month speak for themselves. O wait its now 22

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Your 21 topics this month speak for themselves. O wait its now 22

No, you are speaking for them and mind reading motivation.

17 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

No, you are speaking for them and mind reading motivation.

Motivation can be determined by circumstantial evidence. How many topics have you started since your appearance on this Board under this identity that were NOT about Trump?

Is it "possible" that you despise Trump?. Are you ashamed of that? Others admit it, why cant you? Does the fact that you despise Trump colour your view points? Is that why you fail to answer legitimate questions? Is that why you attack his wife?

Just now, Yagoda said:

Motivation can be determined by circumstantial evidence. How many topics have you started since your appearance on this Board under this identity that were NOT about Trump?

Is it "possible" that you despise Trump?. Are you ashamed of that? Others admit it, why cant you? Does the fact that you despise Trump colour your view points? Is that why you fail to answer legitimate questions? Is that why you attack his wife?

Thanks for demonstrating that you are still making me the subject rather than the issues that belong in the political soapbox. This forum is supposed to be about issues, not the alleged motivations of contributors. How many times have the mods called you on this already?

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Is it "possible" that you despise Trump?. Are you ashamed of that? Others admit it, why cant you? Does the fact that you despise Trump colour your view points?

He has that right, isn't it?

Just now, CallumWK said:

He has that right, isn't it?

The issue isn't whether or not I have the right. The issue is whether or not such considerations belong in the Political Soapbox. It's supposed to be about political issues, not the emotions of aseannow.com members.

3 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

He has that right, isn't it?

On the other hand, it is perfectly legitimate to call attention to the ridiculousness of the statements of political figures, or, for that matter, of members of aseannow.com. For instance one member recently contended that it was possibly libelous to call Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile. Jeffrey Epstein is the guy who pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor.

1 hour ago, CallumWK said:

He has that right, isn't it?

He has that right and in the same way that folks attacked Fox News in the New York Post for their alleged prejudice, I am entitled to point out his.

1 hour ago, Alan Zweibel said:

Thanks for demonstrating that you are still making me the subject rather than the issues that belong in the political soapbox. This forum is supposed to be about issues, not the alleged motivations of contributors. How many times have the mods called you on this already?

You are the subject it's the legitimacy of your views. I did not engage in name calling.

57 minutes ago, Alan Zweibel said:

For instance one member recently contended that it was possibly libelous to call Jeffrey Epstein a pedophile. Jeffrey Epstein is the guy who pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor.

I missed that one, show us

3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

He has that right and in the same way that folks attacked Fox News in the New York Post for their alleged prejudice, I am entitled to point out his.

You are the subject it's the legitimacy of your views. I did not engage in name calling.

If evidence is provided that proves a discrepancy between the facts that are reported and the facts that are not, it is perfectly legitimate to draw an inference of prejudicial reporting.. But prejudice is not an emotion. Specifying what emotion might be behind the prejudice is guesswork and adds nothing useful to the analysis of the content of the article.