28 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

An oxymoron contains two contradictory terms.

"Freedom of speech" does not.

Examples would be an "educated ignoramus" or a "wise fool".

Or my favorite: Reputable agent

1 hour ago, Mavideol said:

Sunny, Sunny !!! are you still concerned with the censorship about Trump, it's amazing what 24 Hours can do, read your post below

SunnyinBangrak

Advanced Member

• 4.8k posts

• 9.1k Reputation

12 hours ago

• Popular Post

Not cool. Certainly not appropriate for a President. These outbursts are totally crazy, he needs to get a grip, and fast.

Stalker alert. Dont believe cross thread stalking and off topic personal trolling comments are appropriate either.

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Stalker alert. Dont believe cross thread stalking and off topic personal trolling comments are appropriate either.

not trolling nor stalking just asking a simple question that you declined to answer

1 minute ago, Mavideol said:

not trolling nor stalking just asking a simple question that you declined to answer

He's refused to answer when asked what was censored or by whom. Several times. And then criticises "lefties" for not replying to the thread when he hasn't explained what we should be replying to or what the thread is even about. Three pages in and he still hasn't said what the censorship was that was so important he needed to start a thread about.........but not important enough to say what it was or who did it.

Just an attention seeker. And this thread is a complete waste of electrons.

34 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

He's refused to answer when asked what was censored or by whom. Several times. And then criticises "lefties" for not replying to the thread when he hasn't explained what we should be replying to or what the thread is even about. Three pages in and he still hasn't said what the censorship was that was so important he needed to start a thread about.........but not important enough to say what it was or who did it.

Just an attention seeker. And this thread is a complete waste of electrons.

It was said as clearly as possible in my OP, line 4 was it? Stop the smug trolling & acting dumb pls.

On 4/4/2026 at 7:00 AM, Yagoda said:

I personally like the way Trump speaks his mind. Hes like my bro in laws brother, the source of great amusement at a tailgate party

Like father like son & daughter I suppose . I never talk politics with my adult children but on a trip back to California. The kids confirmed that the left has lost the plot. They both love the straightforward approach of Trump & his agenda.They both wish the Hollywoods and the music people would all stop feeling so emboldened and pay more attention to their craft.

6 hours ago, riclag said:

Like father like son & daughter I suppose .

My kid is an ignorant lefty that gets her news off Instagram. I have to intellectually humiliate her every day. Shes spoiled because she is rich expat that hasnt stepped foot for more than a week in the USA for 10 years. She doesnt even like guns or smoke weed and doesnt approve of my Nana antics. I failed evidently.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

My kid is an ignorant lefty that gets her news off Instagram. I have to intellectually humiliate her every day. Shes spoiled because she is rich expat that hasnt stepped foot for more than a week in the USA for 10 years. She doesnt even like guns or smoke weed and doesnt approve of my Nana antics. I failed evidently.

She doesn't like guns or smoke weed? She's obviously way more intelligent than you.

Humiliating your own child - yes indeed, you are a miserable failure.

A low value post has been removed:

13. Low-Value Posts - Posts that add no written contribution are not allowed.

    This includes emoji-only replies, very short comments, memes, GIFs, screenshots, or embedded social media posts without explanation or opinion.

8 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

She doesn't like guns or smoke weed? She's obviously way more intelligent than you.

Well without that she is well above you.

24 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Humiliating your own child - yes indeed, you are a miserable failure.

Thanks. She isnt though. No pain, no gain.

5 hours ago, Yagoda said:

My kid is an ignorant lefty that gets her news off Instagram. I have to intellectually humiliate her every day. Shes spoiled because she is rich expat that hasnt stepped foot for more than a week in the USA for 10 years. She doesnt even like guns or smoke weed and doesnt approve of my Nana antics. I failed evidently.

No, you didn't fail at all, don't say that!

You just showed her what a loser and a dreadful human being looks like so big respect for that! Now she knows how to make her own path and not repeat your parenting when she has her own children. Respect to you for making that sacrifice, well done!

On 4/4/2026 at 5:36 AM, BLMFem said:

What's bizarre is that there is a demented pedo rapist in the WH. THAT is what is bizarre.

Step away from the pearls

Anyone knows what was censored and by whom?

On 4/5/2026 at 11:25 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Because the political side that hurl insulting acronyms like TACO all day long are givers not takers?

Because we are not mature enough to read the Presidents words?

Cant think of any other possibilities. But interesting not a single leftie finds such indefensible censorship inappropriate. Says it all.

On 4/5/2026 at 11:25 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Because the political side that hurl insulting acronyms like TACO all day long are givers not takers?

Because we are not mature enough to read the Presidents words?

Cant think of any other possibilities. But interesting not a single leftie finds such indefensible censorship inappropriate. Says it all.

Isn't TACO some kind of Mexican food?

Isn't a leftie a left-handed person?

14 minutes ago, candide said:

Anyone knows what was censored and by whom?

Judging from the OP's posts, nothing has been censored, ie none of his posts give an indication of anything that has been censored.

On 4/4/2026 at 12:23 PM, Hummin said:

So maga talking about free speech now, when millions of workers around in and outside USA can not say what they want to say without being afraid of consequences, like losing their job

Or getting shot.

On 4/4/2026 at 2:09 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

It is a point of principle. You, like those above, clearly DO think censoring a sitting US President and leader of the free world's perfectly legal speech is appropriate in political discussion forums. Interesting yet not surprising.

It's probably time to stop pretending we are participating in political discussion. We are bit players in a lefty propaganda machine where a Presidents words must be censored to stop snowflakes getting triggered aka pathetic. Now, the inflated ego or self importance required to make such incrediblyindefensible decisions is something I can't understand.

Well when the kid's go to School and come with Abuse like that don't come back complaining. " Why did you say that naughty word tommy teacher asks Miss our president said it so its ok "

I may be wrong, but I believe the OP is crying about recently introduced forum moderation of "low value" posts. Thus a favourite acronym of the MAGA hive mind, and the non-existent medical terminology from which it is lazily and unimaginatively extracted is deleted. Is it really the forum's fault that the bulk of posts from him and from those of that ilk, are low value?

As for his observation on the alleged deceit of the British PM with regard to censorship of free speech, I think Ye is far better positioned to comment on that.

1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

I may be wrong, but I believe the OP is crying about recently introduced forum moderation of "low value" posts. Thus a favourite acronym of the MAGA hive mind, and the non-existent medical terminology from which it is lazily and unimaginatively extracted is deleted. Is it really the forum's fault that the bulk of posts from him and from those of that ilk, are low value?

As for his observation on the alleged deceit of the British PM with regard to censorship of free speech, I think Ye is far better positioned to comment on that.

The OP is always crying about something.

7 hours ago, candide said:

Anyone knows what was censored and by whom?

Nope. And despite having been asked several times what it is he's bleating about the OP still hasn't said.

No need to censor.

If the lefty snowflakes can't handle it they can watch CNN.

I enjoy his straight talking style. It reminds me how lucky we are to have avoided 4 years of Cali vocal fried psycho babble from DEI Harris.

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

No need to censor.

If the lefty snowflakes can't handle it they can watch CNN.

I enjoy his straight talking style. It reminds me how lucky we are to have avoided 4 years of Cali vocal fried psycho babble from DEI Harris.

Mr Hypocrisy rides in!

"Lefty snowflakes", when your orange hero is the biggest snowflake of them all. Now having a snowflake meltdown because CNN dared to report an Iranian claim as, erm, an Iranian claim.

And three pages in to this thread and still not one person will say what was censored, where, or by whom. So seeing as you have an opinion that it is lefty snowflakes perhaps you can enlighten us? What was censored, where, and by whom?

9 hours ago, NanLaew said:

I may be wrong, but I believe the OP is crying about recently introduced forum moderation of "low value" posts.

I am not crying about anything. I am merely asking if we consider it appropriate than on an adults political discussion forum, is it appropriate the Presidents legal words are censored so as not to offend people of the left.

What is notable after 3 days is that those who the one sided censorship protects are smug and dishonest. Pretending to not know, and trying to troll others into falling foul of the censorship. A veey sad group of people IMO.

5 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

And three pages in to this thread and still not one person will say what was censored, where, or by whom. So seeing as you have an opinion that it is lefty snowflakes perhaps you can enlighten us? What was censored, where, and by whom?

I suggest you read the forum rules Bloggs.

It might become more clear, if you can understand them.

6 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I am not crying about anything. I am merely asking if we consider it appropriate than on an adults political discussion forum, is it appropriate the Presidents legal words are censored so as not to offend people of the left.

What is notable after 3 days is that those who the one sided censorship protects are smug and dishonest. Pretending to not know, and trying to troll others into falling foul of the censorship. A veey sad group of people IMO.

All you have to do is say what was censored, or point us to where, then we can have an opinion and join your one sided discussion.

It is not "pretending not to know", it is actually not knowing because you haven't told anyone what you are complaining about.

What a bizarre thread.

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

I suggest you read the forum rules Bloggs.

It might become more clear, if you can understand them.

Again, no straight answer. It's ok to say you have no idea what he's on about either.

On 4/4/2026 at 1:11 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Do members find it a sign of a mature political discussion platform, when the sitting US President's own legal words and writings are censored(as an eg. His Bruce Springsteen tweet yesterday) so as not to offend people of the left?

I find this very concerning, and struggle to understand how this can happen in 2026.

Presumably posters of the left applaud censorship of the US President, while simultaneously claiming to be proud of the "free speech" we enjoy - like sir Kier recently lied about?

How do you censor a guy who’s every word out of his mouth can’t be trusted?He changes hourly.what he says carry’s weight insofar as any damage it may cause but no more than that.his words mean nothing it’s what he does that counts all the rest is just a fire hose of noise.

1 minute ago, Tug said:

How do you censor a guy who’s every word out of his mouth can’t be trusted?He changes hourly.what he says carry’s weight insofar as any damage it may cause but no more than that.his words mean nothing it’s what he does that counts all the rest is just a fire hose of noise.

I would have used a sewage pipe rather than a fire hose.

38 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I am not crying about anything. I am merely asking if we consider it appropriate than on an adults political discussion forum, is it appropriate the Presidents legal words are censored so as not to offend people of the left.

What is notable after 3 days is that those who the one sided censorship protects are smug and dishonest. Pretending to not know, and trying to troll others into falling foul of the censorship. A veey sad group of people IMO.

Yet you are unable to cite a precise example, just whining. Are you making stuff up, as usual? 😃

You do that a lot!

23 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I would have used a sewage pipe rather than a fire hose.

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Yet you are unable to cite a precise example, just whining. Are you making stuff up, as usual? 😃

You do that a lot!

When tarpon fishing, we cast the fly way beyond the fish and slowly bring it into view. If you plonk a 2" fly right on a tarpons nose it will do the elephant & mouse routine. Subtletly is key.

Can you "special needs" posters stop pretending you dont understand what is being censored and why, while frantically trying to get the thread shut down. You made it clear you need censorship of your political opponents, and find it appropriate, lets just move on with our lives.