I posted this #3 comment page 1:

This is verbatim what was said (Truth Social post on Bruce Springsteen)

I guess the OP is observing that 3 words of the President would generally be against forum posting rules.

1 minute ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

When tarpon fishing, we cast the fly way beyond the fish and slowly bring it into view. If you plonk a 2" fly right on a tarpons nose it will do the elephant & mouse routine. Subtletly is key.

Can you "special needs" posters stop pretending you dont understand what is being censored and why, while frantically trying to get the thread shut down. You made it clear you need censorship of your political opponents, and find it appropriate, lets just move on with our lives.

No one is trying to get this thread shut down, where did you get that from? In fact we're trying to open it up by asking what the censorship is that you are alluding to. Just tell us. Otherwise what is the point of this thread?

Tell us, we can form an opinion on it and can join in. Why are you so reluctant? Is it because you only want to bleat and don't want a discussion? I can think of no other reason for the constant avoidance.

Never on AN have I seen such a bizarre, childish and self obsessed attention seeking thread (ah sorry, there was Cameroni's car crash of a thread about a hooker). You ask if we agree with the censorship of the president on this forum, but you don't say what has been censored, where, or by whom. So how the hell can we tell you what we think about it if you won't tell us what it is?

It's mental.

3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

No one is trying to get this thread shut down, where did you get that from? In fact we're trying to open it up by asking what the censorship is that you are alluding to. Just tell us. Otherwise what is the point of this thread?

Tell us, we can form an opinion on it and can join in. Why are you so reluctant? Is it because you only want to bleat and don't want a discussion? I can think of no other reason for the constant avoidance.

Never on AN have I seen such a bizarre, childish and self obsessed attention seeking thread. You ask if we agree with the censorship of the president on this forum, but you don't say what has been censored, where, or by whom. So how the hell can we tell you what we think about it if you won't tell us what it is?

It's mental.

It was clearly laid out in the OP(line 5 was it) and several other posters informed you. Again, please stop derailing the thread with mendacious replies.

15 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

It was clearly laid out in the OP(line 5 was it) and several other posters informed you. Again, please stop derailing the thread with mendacious replies.

Sigh. Your exact post:

Do members find it a sign of a mature political discussion platform, when the sitting US President's own legal words and writings are censored(as an eg. His Bruce Springsteen tweet yesterday) so as not to offend people of the left?

I find this very concerning, and struggle to understand how this can happen in 2026.

Presumably posters of the left applaud censorship of the US President, while simultaneously claiming to be proud of the "free speech" we enjoy - like sir Kier recently lied about?

If you think that's "clearly laying it out" then you have real issues.

You say his legal words were censored on this forum and something about a Bruce Springsteen tweet.

Which words were censored? Where? Who censored them?

We'll leave your silly assertion that the forum does so as not to offend people on the left and your Keir Starmer nonsense. Let's just concentrate on the crux of your post.

Which "legal words" were censored? Where? Who censored them?

Why can't you just answer a simple question?

Which words were censored? Where? Who censored them?

If it upset you so much that there are now four pages of bleats and hand wringing about it you clearly know what the answer is, so why not tell us so we can form an opinion and tell you what it is and thereby start a discussion.

Which words were censored? Where? Who censored them?

21 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

It was clearly laid out in the OP(line 5 was it) and several other posters informed you. Again, please stop derailing the thread with mendacious replies.

Ok so that's the post.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116334990675013056

1 minute ago, candide said:

Ok so that's the post.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116334990675013056

Great. And where was it censored? Maybe we'll get there eventually.....I mean the OP could just tell us but apparently that's too hard.

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Great. And where was it censored?

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Great. And where was it censored?

Maybe the Sphinx in Bangrak will tell us! 😃

5 hours ago, candide said:

Maybe the Sphinx in Bangrak will tell us! 😃

And the Sphinx has been all over the forum since but hasn't been able to come back to his own thread to tell us what was censored or where. How utterly pathetic. Limp. He obviously doesn't want a discussion, only wants to bleat and for people to say "amazing bleating, we all agree with the mystery thing, well said!".