Just now, Dan O said:

papers that have been peer reviewed

Totally discredited as of late and probably have been for a long while

peer review process is totally broken and corrupted.

Just now, johng said:

Totally discredited as of late and probably have been for a long while

peer review process is totally broken and corrupted.

Another know nothing

Just now, Dan O said:

No i had a career in the medical industry spanning 25 years and worked in manufacturing and regulatory compliance with FDA regulations.

Just now, Dan O said:

What did you do?

I didn't take the Covid vaccine.

Just now, rattlesnake said:

I didn't take the Covid vaccine.

Nice non answer. everyone had a choice to make and should have chosen based on their personal medical history and vulnerability.

I have never indicated people should or should not take a vaccine ( of any kind) its a personal choice but dont start piling on dubious articles from questionable sources as facts.

Just now, Dan O said:

Nice non answer. everyone had a choice to make and should have chosen based on their personal medical history and vulnerability.

"Take the jab or lose you job" is only a valid choice in the mind of a psychopath.

Just now, Dan O said:

dont start piling on dubious articles from questionable sources as facts.

Questionable as decided by who? That is the question you will most certainly avoid at all costs.

Which reminds me, William Makis, another "quack" on whom you will find dozens of pharma-funded hit pieces if you google him, is receiving extremely lucrative offers from the same industry which has been smearing him for years. Why would they offer such prestigious positions to a "discredited wacko", I wonder? Could it be that he is about to open a cancer clinic which will actually cure people without any pharmaceutical protocols or products? No, surely not, I mean we all know that correlation does not mean causation, right?

Edited May 1May 1 by rattlesnake

Actually I'm sure more than 50% of people didn't care or think whether the vaccines were good or bad, but took the vaccines just so they could do everyday things, or travel. Remember the restrictions in some places/countries were so restrictive, that without being vaccinated you were classified as a pariah. Sure many will agree with this assumption (or not).

Just now, Dan O said:

Nope no need for any article thats been posted here. Try reading accredited medical studies and papers that have been peer reviewed but if you dont understand the meaning of the medical terminology then dont bother.

And when in response Rattles then posts an article about a meta-study of 700 peer-reviewed studies, you dismiss it out of hand. Got it, you only want to consider evidence that supports your bias.

Just now, Dan O said:

Nice non answer. everyone had a choice to make and should have chosen based on their personal medical history and vulnerability.

I have never indicated people should or should not take a vaccine ( of any kind) its a personal choice but dont start piling on dubious articles from questionable sources as facts.

Just now, couchpotato said:

Actually I'm sure more than 50% of people didn't care or think whether the vaccines were good or bad, but took the vaccines just so they could do everyday things, or travel. Remember the restrictions in some places/countries were so restrictive, that without being vaccinated you were classified as a pariah. Sure many will agree with this assumption (or not).

I was on the receiving end of this persecution and confirm this is correct.

I was in France between November 2021 and June 2022, at the peak of the crisis, and there were debates on mainstream television on whether we should be forcefully inoculated or not, and possibly face jail time – for example, Austria, at the time, had announced that it would make the vaccine mandatory under penalty of jail, and the authorities in all EU countries were considering following that example.

And then there were the insults, threats and all types of "expert" testimonies, articles and studies incessantly bombarded at the people 24/7, explaining why refusing the vaccine was tantamount to mental illness, immaturity, selfishness, lesser education and intelligence, the average citizen being led to conclude that the unvaccinated were undesirable and dangerous elements of society, a "problem" to be resolved with utmost urgency.

Just now, Dan O said:

Nice try

After decades of active sports my knees are giving me issues - those Covid vaccines really did job on me, I'm not sure which one causes the knee pain, if its the adenovirus or mRNA - but one of them is causing my knees to hurt.

I'm just waiting for the right meme so I can know for sure...

Just now, rattlesnake said:

"Take the jab or lose you job" is only a valid choice in the mind of a psychopath.

Questionable as decided by who? That is the question you will most certainly avoid at all costs.

Which reminds me, William Makis, another "quack" on whom you will find dozens of pharma-funded hit pieces if you google him, is receiving extremely lucrative offers from the same industry which has been smearing him for years. Why would they offer such prestigious positions to a "discredited wacko", I wonder? Could it be that he is about to open a cancer clinic which will actually cure people without any pharmaceutical protocols or products? No, surely not, I mean we all know that correlation does not mean causation, right?

like many industries some have specific requirements. Medical and healthcare, and a variety of others, Its still your choice. You could leave, stay and take the shot or argue legality. no one held you down to inject you.

you can randomly pick any number of people associated with Pharm, regulatory companies medical institutes in the same position with conflicting and opposing views on any subject. Your example has not been proven to cure cancer so again dubious information.

Just now, Red Phoenix said:

And when in response Rattles then posts an article about a meta-study of 700 peer-reviewed studies, you dismiss it out of hand. Got it, you only want to consider evidence that supports your bias.

go back and actual paper not the article and background on the paper. Then read up on the author and his history of publishing medical papers which have been retracted after peer review. ALso check his actual medical credentials and experience. I have no bias as Ive stated its an individual choice made by being informed, pros and cons and then decide. You are the one with the bias

Just now, Dan O said:

Your example has not been proven to cure cancer so again dubious information.

Sudden lucrative offers such as 400k Executive Director positions, by the biggest names in the medical establishment to drop his cancer clinic and become very wealthy and influent… after having been smeared as a quack impostor for years by that same establishment… What is the rational explanation for this 180° about turn?

Simple: his ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole protocol works, unlike chemo, and they know it. The billion-dollar cancer industry is threatened and desperately trying to stop him.

There are hundreds of testimonials on his X account.

Just now, richard_smith237 said:

After decades of active sports my knees are giving me issues - those Covid vaccines really did job on me, I'm not sure which one causes the knee pain, if its the adenovirus or mRNA - but one of them is causing my knees to hurt.

I'm just waiting for the right meme so I can know for sure...

If that is all you can muster, then the position you are defending really is on its last legs (no pun itended).

Just now, Dan O said:

Another know nothing

Yes that's you..I know nothing because the 'science' says so 🤣

Just now, johng said:

Yes that's you..I know nothing because the 'science' says so 🤣

They Know, you understand… and Their Word may not be challenged… They are Priests of The Almighty Science™.

Just now, rattlesnake said:

Simple: his ivermectin

Remember you're not a horse y'all ?

They tried very hard to demonise and discredit anything to do with Ivermectin it's become perfectly clear why.

Just now, johng said:

Remember you're not a horse y'all ?

They tried very hard to demonise and discredit anything to do with Ivermectin it's become perfectly clear why.

Like the lying clown Chris Cuomo… who now takes ivermectin himself to treat his vaccine injury… 🤡

Like the lying clown Chris Cuomo… who now takes ivermectin himself to treat his vaccine injury… 🤡

Talk about karma...

I am disapointed that too few people

have died from the mrna shots. Maybe why we don't hear much of the vaccinated,

because the deaths don't stand out much and certainly not to them.

We are are 5 years futher and while there are turbo cancers and myocarditis,

blood clots , comprimized immunities ,... far too few to get a

significant population reduction.

Fauci & Gates and their gang must be very diappointed too.

On 4/30/2026 at 8:46 AM, rattlesnake said:

And they hate us for it so be careful.

“People will forgive you for being wrong. Anyone can make a mistake. But they will never forgive you for being right.”

Jimmy Dore

Just now, FlorC said:

I am disapointed that too few people

have died from the mrna shots. Maybe why we don't hear much of the vaccinated,

because the deaths don't stand out much and certainly not to them.

We are are 5 years futher and while there are turbo cancers and myocarditis,

blood clots , comprimized immunities ,... far too few to get a

significant population reduction.

Fauci & Gates and their gang must be very diappointed too.

It depends on how you look at it and how far you believe their strategic vision stretches. People have been, for all intents and purposes, sterilised – pregnancies have taken a massive, simultaneous dive worldwide and miscarriages are through the roof. For someone who sees overpopulation as the biggest problem, that's not a bad result.

Just now, FlorC said:

Fauci & Gates and their gang must be very diappointed too.

They still have the flying needles mosquitoes the lone star tick virus

the no fertiliser and no energy

War,Famine,Pestilence and Death... Amen !!!!

Just now, Dan O said:

Its still your choice. You could leave, stay and take the shot or argue legality. no one held you down to inject you.

It's not your choice when it is Hobson's choice ..the military grade psyop

and mockingbird media coverage in lockstep they didn't need to hold you down to inject you when the pressure was already so intense only a very few very stubborn individuals could resist.

Edited May 1May 1 by johng

Just now, rattlesnake said:

Sudden lucrative offers such as 400k Executive Director positions, by the biggest names in the medical establishment to drop his cancer clinic and become very wealthy and influent… after having been smeared as a quack impostor for years by that same establishment… What is the rational explanation for this 180° about turn?

Simple: his ivermectin, mebendazole and fenbendazole protocol works, unlike chemo, and they know it. The billion-dollar cancer industry is threatened and desperately trying to stop him.

There are hundreds of testimonials on his X account.

there are countless claims of cures from cancers so your example means nothing in the grand scheme of your argument but you go with that.

Just now, johng said:

Yes that's you..I know nothing because the 'science' says so 🤣

no, you know nothing but thats not science's fault

Just now, johng said:

They still have the flying needles mosquitoes the lone star tick virus

the no fertiliser and no energy

War,Famine,Pestilence and Death... Amen !!!!

I like the lone star tick virus.

Hope they spread it all over the planet.

And don't forget that they can put the spike protein in food too.

Are we , the non-mrna infected, still pure ?

I could see especially US companies putting it in all kinds of foods.

Who knows when you drink coke or pepsi or even snack on lays chips

here in Thailand , we don't get some free mrna goodies.

Just for fun, I posed a statistical question to ChatGPT, which then searched for data to reply to my question:

"A question about well-known antivaxers, those people who claim that the Covid vaccination caused more harm than good etc. do you know about what percentage of these claims were made by US citizens?"

Go ask ChatGPT yourself... the data shows in simple terms, that the vast majority of these nut jobs are US citizens......

So, no surprises there, at least not for me :)

Just now, Dan O said:

there are countless claims of cures from cancers so your example means nothing in the grand scheme of your argument but you go with that.

9,000 proven cures is a little bit more than a claim, but you are never going to actually look into it, are you? That's the beauty of residing atop an FDA-sponsored pedestal, One Knows.

Edited May 1May 1 by rattlesnake

Just now, Dan O said:

no, you know nothing but thats not science's fault

Science (not Science™) should be all over Dr. Hulscher's incredibly effective and promising treatment, instead of trying to stifle it.

Just now, simon43 said:

Just for fun, I posed a statistical question to ChatGPT, which then searched for data to reply to my question:

"A question about well-known antivaxers, those people who claim that the Covid vaccination caused more harm than good etc. do you know about what percentage of these claims were made by US citizens?"

Go ask ChatGPT yourself... the data shows in simple terms, that the vast majority of these nut jobs are US citizens......

So, no surprises there, at least not for me :)

Thank you for your input, Simon. It's good that educated and smart voices are taking part in this conversation.